Amazon Web Services MLS-C01 Dumps

The data scientist should use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to sort the data into two groups named “enrolled” or “not enrolled.” This will create a labeled dataset that can be used for supervised learning. The data scientist should then use a classification algorithm to run predictions on the test data. A classification algorithm is a suitable choice for predicting a binary outcome, such as enrollment status, based on the input features, such as academic performance. A classification algorithm will output a probability for each class label and assign the most likely label to each observation.

References:

Use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to Label Data

Classification Algorithm in Machine Learning

In Amazon SageMaker, hyperparameter tuning jobs optimize model performance by adjusting hyperparameters. Amazon SageMaker’s hyperparameter tuning supports completion criteria settings that enable efficient management of tuning resources. In this scenario, the ML specialist aims to set a completion criterion that will terminate the tuning job as soon as SageMaker detects that further improvements in the objective metric are unlikely to exceed 1%.

The CompleteOnConvergence setting is designed for such requirements. This criterion enables the tuning job to automatically stop when SageMaker determines that additional hyperparameter evaluations are unlikely to improve the objective metric beyond a certain threshold, allowing for efficient tuning completion. The convergence process relies on an internal optimization algorithm that continuously evaluates the objective metric during tuning and stops when performance stabilizes without further improvement.

This is supported by AWS documentation, which explains that CompleteOnConvergence is an efficient way to manage tuning by stopping unnecessary evaluations once the model performance stabilizes within the specified threshold.

 Amazon Forecast requires the input data to be in a specific format. The data scientist should use ETL jobs in AWS Glue to separate the dataset into a target time series dataset and an item metadata dataset. The target time series dataset should contain the timestamp, item_id, and demand columns, while the item metadata dataset should contain the item_id, category, and lead_time columns. Both datasets should be uploaded as .csv files to Amazon S3 . References:

How Amazon Forecast Works - Amazon Forecast

Choosing Datasets - Amazon Forecast

The solution C is the most likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because it increases the number of shards for the data stream. The number of shards determines the throughput capacity of the data stream, which affects the rate of data ingestion. Each shard can support up to 1 MB per second of data input and 2 MB per second of data output. By increasing the number of shards, the company can increase the data ingestion rate proportionally. The company can use the UpdateShardCount API operation to modify the number of shards in the data stream1.

The other options are not likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because:

Option A: Increasing the number of S3 prefixes for the delivery stream to write to will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is organized in the S3 bucket. The number of S3 prefixes can help to optimize the performance of downstream applications that read the data from S3, but it does not impact the performance of Kinesis Data Firehose2.

Option B: Decreasing the retention period for the data stream will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the amount of time the data is stored in the data stream. The retention period can help to manage the data availability and durability, but it does not impact the throughput capacity of the data stream3.

Option D: Adding more consumers using the Kinesis Client Library (KCL) will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is processed by downstream applications. The consumers can help to scale the data processing and handle failures, but they do not impact the data ingestion into S3 by Kinesis Data Firehose4.

References:

1: Resharding - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

2: Amazon S3 Prefixes - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: Data Retention - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

4: Developing Consumers Using the Kinesis Client Library - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a technique for reducing the dimensionality of datasets, increasing interpretability but at the same time minimizing information loss. It does so by creating new uncorrelated variables that successively maximize variance. PCA is useful when dealing with datasets that have a large number of correlated features. However, PCA is sensitive to the scale of the features, so it is important to standardize or normalize the data before applying PCA. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in algorithm for PCA that can be used to transform the data into a lower-dimensional representation. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is a tool that allows data scientists to visually explore, clean, and prepare data for machine learning. Data Wrangler provides various transformation steps that can be applied to the data, such as scaling, encoding, imputing, etc. Data Wrangler also integrates with SageMaker built-in algorithms, such as PCA, to enable feature engineering and dimensionality reduction. Therefore, option B is the correct answer, as it involves scaling the data with a Min Max Scaler transformation step, which rescales the data to a range of [0, 1], and then using the SageMaker built-in algorithm for PCA on the scaled dataset to transform the data. Option A is incorrect, as it does not involve scaling the data before applying PCA, which can affect the results of the dimensionality reduction. Option C is incorrect, as it involves removing the features that have the highest correlation, which can lead to information loss and reduce the performance of the regression model. Option D is incorrect, as it involves removing the features that have the lowest correlation, which can also lead to information loss and reduce the performance of the regression model. References:

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) - Amazon SageMaker

Scale data with a Min Max Scaler - Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

Use Amazon SageMaker built-in algorithms - Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

AWS Glue jobs is the AWS service or feature that will meet the requirements with the least development effort over time. AWS Glue jobs is a fully managed service that enables data engineers to run Apache Spark applications on a serverless Spark environment. AWS Glue jobs can perform batch preprocessing data transformations on large datasets stored in Amazon S3, such as converting data formats, filtering data, joining data, and aggregating data. AWS Glue jobs can also scale the Spark environment automatically based on the data volume and processing needs, without requiring any infrastructure provisioning or management. AWS Glue jobs can reduce the development effort and time by providing a graphical interface to create and monitor Spark applications, as well as a code generation feature that can generate Scala or Python code based on the data sources and targets. AWS Glue jobs can also integrate with other AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, Amazon EMR, and Amazon SageMaker, to enable further data analysis and machine learning tasks1.

The other options are either more complex or less scalable than AWS Glue jobs. Amazon EMR cluster is a managed service that enables data engineers to run Apache Spark applications on a cluster of Amazon EC2 instances. However, Amazon EMR cluster requires more development effort and time than AWS Glue jobs, as it involves setting up, configuring, and managing the cluster, as well as writing and deploying the Spark code. Amazon EMR cluster also does not scale automatically, but requires manual or scheduled resizing of the cluster based on the data volume and processing needs2. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that enables data engineers to analyze data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. However, Amazon Athena is not suitable for performing complex data transformations, such as joining data from multiple sources, aggregating data, or applying custom logic. Amazon Athena is also not designed for running Spark applications, but only supports SQL queries3. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that enables data engineers to run code without provisioning or managing servers. However, AWS Lambda is not optimized for running Spark applications, as it has limitations on the execution time, memory size, and concurrency of the functions. AWS Lambda is also not integrated with Amazon S3, and requires additional steps to read and write data from S3 buckets.

References:

1: AWS Glue - Fully Managed ETL Service - Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon EMR - Amazon Web Services

3: Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Queries for Data in Amazon S3

[4]: AWS Lambda – Serverless Compute - Amazon Web Services

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

Linear least squares regression is a method of fitting a linear model to a set of data by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the observed and predicted values. The solution of the linear least squares problem can be obtained by solving the normal equations, which are given by

ATAx=ATb,

where A is the matrix of explanatory variables, b is the vector of response variables, and x is the vector of unknown coefficients.

However, if the matrix A has two features that are perfectly linearly dependent, then the matrix ATA will be singular, meaning that it does not have a unique inverse. This implies that the normal equations do not have a unique solution, and the linear least squares problem is ill-posed. In other words, there are infinitely many values of x that can satisfy the normal equations, and the linear model is not identifiable.

This can be an issue for the linear least squares regression model, as it can lead to instability, inconsistency, and poor generalization of the model. It can also cause numerical difficulties when trying to solve the normal equations using computational methods, such as matrix inversion or decomposition. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid or remove the linearly dependent features from the matrix A before applying the linear least squares regression model.

References:

Linear least squares (mathematics)

Linear Regression in Matrix Form

Singular Matrix Problem

The best solution to meet the requirements is to tune the csv_weight hyperparameter and the scale_pos_weight hyperparameter by using automatic model tuning (AMT). Optimize on {“HyperParameterTuningJobObjective”: {“MetricName”: “validation:f1”, “Type”: “Maximize”}}.

The csv_weight hyperparameter is used to specify the instance weights for the training data in CSV format. This can help handle imbalanced data by assigning higher weights to the minority class examples and lower weights to the majority class examples. The scale_pos_weight hyperparameter is used to control the balance of positive and negative weights. It is the ratio of the number of negative class examples to the number of positive class examples. Setting a higher value for this hyperparameter can increase the importance of the positive class and improve the recall. Both of these hyperparameters can help the XGBoost model capture as many instances of returned items as possible.

Automatic model tuning (AMT) is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that automates the process of finding the best hyperparameter values for a machine learning model. AMT uses Bayesian optimization to search the hyperparameter space and evaluate the model performance based on a predefined objective metric. The objective metric is the metric that AMT tries to optimize by adjusting the hyperparameter values. For imbalanced classification problems, accuracy is not a good objective metric, as it can be misleading and biased towards the majority class. A better objective metric is the F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. The F1 score can reflect the balance between precision and recall and is more suitable for imbalanced data. The F1 score ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 is the best possible value. Therefore, the type of the objective should be “Maximize” to achieve the highest F1 score.

By tuning the csv_weight and scale_pos_weight hyperparameters and optimizing on the F1 score, the data scientist can meet the requirements most cost-effectively. This solution requires tuning only two hyperparameters, which can reduce the computation time and cost compared to tuning all possible hyperparameters. This solution also uses the appropriate objective metric for imbalanced classification, which can improve the model performance and capture more instances of returned items.

References:

•XGBoost Hyperparameters

•Automatic Model Tuning

•How to Configure XGBoost for Imbalanced Classification

•Imbalanced Data

The Data Science team is facing a problem of imbalanced data, where the positive class (paid users) is much less frequent than the negative class (non-paid users). This can cause the random forest model to be biased towards the majority class and have poor performance on the minority class. To mitigate this issue, the Data Science team can try the following approaches:

C. Generate more positive samples by duplicating the positive samples and adding a small amount of noise to the duplicated data. This is a technique called data augmentation, which can help increase the size and diversity of the training data for the minority class. This can help the random forest model learn more features and patterns from the positive class and reduce the imbalance ratio.

D. Change the cost function so that false negatives have a higher impact on the cost value than false positives. This is a technique called cost-sensitive learning, which can assign different weights or costs to different classes or errors. By assigning a higher cost to false negatives (predicting non-paid when the user is actually paid), the random forest model can be more sensitive to the minority class and try to minimize the misclassification of the positive class.

References:

Bagging and Random Forest for Imbalanced Classification

Surviving in a Random Forest with Imbalanced Datasets

machine learning - random forest for imbalanced data? - Cross Validated

Biased Random Forest For Dealing With the Class Imbalance Problem

The data scientist should use the area under the precision-recall curve and the true positive rate to optimize the model. These metrics are suitable for imbalanced classification problems, such as credit card fraud detection, where the positive class (fraudulent transactions) is much rarer than the negative class (non-fraudulent transactions).

The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) is a measure of how well the model can identify the positive class among all the predicted positives. Precision is the fraction of predicted positives that are actually positive, and recall is the fraction of actual positives that are correctly predicted. A higher AUPRC means that the model can achieve a higher precision with a higher recall, which is desirable for fraud detection.

The true positive rate (TPR) is another name for recall. It is also known as sensitivity or hit rate. It measures the proportion of actual positives that are correctly identified by the model. A higher TPR means that the model can capture more positives, which is the company’s goal.

References:

Metrics for Imbalanced Classification in Python - Machine Learning Mastery

Precision-Recall - scikit-learn

The best way to retrain the model to meet the requirements is to set the target_recall hyperparameter to 90% and set the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria hyperparameter to recall_at_target_precision. This will instruct the linear learner algorithm to optimize the model for a high recall score, while maintaining a reasonable precision score. Recall is the proportion of actual positives that were identified correctly, which is important for the company’s goal of reaching at least 90% of the customers who are likely to buy the new product1. Precision is the proportion of positive identifications that were actually correct, which is also relevant for the company’s budget and efficiency2. By setting the target_recall to 90%, the algorithm will try to achieve a recall score of at least 90%, and by setting the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria to recall_at_target_precision, the algorithm will select the model that has the highest recall score among those that have a precision score equal to or higher than the target precision3. The target precision is automatically set to the median of the precision scores of all the models trained in parallel4.

The other options are not correct or optimal, because they have the following drawbacks:

B: Setting the target_precision hyperparameter to 90% and setting the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria hyperparameter to precision_at_target_recall will optimize the model for a high precision score, while maintaining a reasonable recall score. However, this is not aligned with the company’s goal of reaching at least 90% of the customers who are likely to buy the new product, as precision does not reflect how well the model identifies the actual positives1. Moreover, setting the target_precision to 90% might be too high and unrealistic for the dataset, as the current precision score is only 75%4.

C: Using 90% of the historical data for training and setting the number of epochs to 20 will not necessarily improve the recall score of the model, as it does not change the optimization objective or the model selection criteria. Moreover, using more data for training might reduce the amount of data available for validation, which is needed for selecting the best model among the ones trained in parallel3. The number of epochs is also not a decisive factor for the recall score, as it depends on the learning rate, the optimizer, and the convergence of the algorithm5.

D: Setting the normalize_label hyperparameter to true and setting the number of classes to 2 will not affect the recall score of the model, as these are irrelevant hyperparameters for binary classification problems. The normalize_label hyperparameter is only applicable for regression problems, as it controls whether the label is normalized to have zero mean and unit variance3. The number of classes hyperparameter is only applicable for multiclass classification problems, as it specifies the number of output classes3.

References:

1: Classification: Precision and Recall | Machine Learning | Google for Developers

2: Precision and recall - Wikipedia

3: Linear Learner Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

4: How linear learner works - Amazon SageMaker

5: Getting hands-on with Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner - Pluralsight

To develop a daily ETL workflow containing multiple ETL jobs that can start as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3, the best configuration is to use AWS Lambda to trigger an AWS Step Functions workflow to wait for dataset uploads to complete in Amazon S3. Use AWS Glue to join the datasets. Use an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to send an SNS notification to the Administrator in the case of a failure.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use Lambda to create functions that respond to events such as data uploads to Amazon S3. You can also use Lambda to invoke other AWS services such as AWS Step Functions and AWS Glue.

AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use Step Functions to create a state machine that defines the sequence and logic of your ETL workflow. You can also use Step Functions to handle errors and retries, and to monitor the execution status of your workflow.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to discover, prepare, and combine data for analytics. You can use Glue to create and run ETL jobs that can join data from multiple sources in Amazon S3. You can also use Glue to catalog your data and make it searchable and queryable.

Amazon CloudWatch is a service that monitors your AWS resources and applications. You can use CloudWatch to create alarms that trigger actions when a metric or a log event meets a specified threshold. You can also use CloudWatch to send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) topics, which can then deliver the notifications to subscribers such as email addresses or phone numbers.

Therefore, by using these services together, you can achieve the following benefits:

You can start the ETL workflow as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3 by using Lambda functions to trigger Step Functions workflows.

You can wait for all the datasets to be available in Amazon S3 by using Step Functions to poll the S3 buckets and check the data completeness.

You can join the datasets with terabyte-sized datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs that can scale and parallelize the data processing.

You can store the results of joining datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs to write the output to S3 buckets.

You can send a notification to the Administrator if one of the jobs fails by using CloudWatch alarms to monitor the Step Functions or Glue metrics and send SNS notifications in case of a failure.

Amazon SageMaker script mode is a feature that allows users to use training scripts similar to those they would use outside SageMaker with SageMaker’s prebuilt containers for various frameworks such as TensorFlow. Script mode supports reading data from Amazon S3 buckets without requiring any changes to the training script. Therefore, option B is the best method of providing training data to Amazon SageMaker that would meet the business requirements with the least development overhead.

Option A is incorrect because using a local path of the data would not be scalable or reliable, as it would depend on the availability and capacity of the local storage. Moreover, using a local path of the data would not leverage the benefits of Amazon S3, such as durability, security, and performance. Option C is incorrect because rewriting the train.py script to convert TFRecords to protobuf would require additional development effort and complexity, as well as introduce potential errors and inconsistencies in the data format. Option D is incorrect because preparing the data in the format accepted by Amazon SageMaker would also require additional development effort and complexity, as well as involve using additional services such as AWS Glue or AWS Lambda, which would increase the cost and maintenance of the solution.

References:

Bring your own model with Amazon SageMaker script mode

GitHub - aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-script-mode

Deep Dive on TensorFlow training with Amazon SageMaker and Amazon S3

amazon-sagemaker-script-mode/generate_cifar10_tfrecords.py at master

To build a conversational interface that can use natural language to get data from the reports, the company can use a combination of services that can handle both written and spoken inputs, understand the user’s intent and query, and extract the relevant information from the reports. The services that can be used for this purpose are:

Amazon Lex: A service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. Amazon Lex can create chatbots that can interact with users using natural language, and integrate with other AWS services such as Amazon Connect, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe. Amazon Lex can also use lambda functions to implement the business logic and fulfill the user’s requests.

Amazon Comprehend: A service for natural language processing and text analytics. Amazon Comprehend can analyze text and speech inputs and extract insights such as entities, key phrases, sentiment, syntax, and topics. Amazon Comprehend can also use custom classifiers and entity recognizers to identify specific terms and concepts that are relevant to the domain of the reports.

Amazon Transcribe: A service for speech-to-text conversion. Amazon Transcribe can transcribe audio inputs into text outputs, and add punctuation and formatting. Amazon Transcribe can also use custom vocabularies and language models to improve the accuracy and quality of the transcription for the specific domain of the reports.

Therefore, the company can use the following architecture to build the conversational interface:

Use Amazon Lex to create a chatbot that can accept both written and spoken inputs from the executives. The chatbot can use intents, utterances, and slots to capture the user’s query and parameters, such as the report name, date, metric, or filter.

Use Amazon Transcribe to convert the spoken inputs into text outputs, and pass them to Amazon Lex. Amazon Transcribe can use a custom vocabulary and language model to recognize the terms and concepts related to the reports.

Use Amazon Comprehend to analyze the text inputs and outputs, and extract the relevant information from the reports. Amazon Comprehend can use a custom classifier and entity recognizer to identify the report name, date, metric, or filter from the user’s query, and the corresponding data from the reports.

Use a lambda function to implement the business logic and fulfillment of the user’s query, such as retrieving the data from the reports, performing calculations or aggregations, and formatting the response. The lambda function can also handle errors and validations, and provide feedback to the user.

Use Amazon Lex to return the response to the user, either in text or speech format, depending on the user’s preference.

References:

What Is Amazon Lex?

What Is Amazon Comprehend?

What Is Amazon Transcribe?

 Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. It can also use machine learning algorithms, such as Random Cut Forest (RCF), to perform anomaly detection on streaming data. By inserting a Kinesis Data Analytics stream downstream of the Kinesis Data Firehose stream, the retail chain can transform the raw record attributes into simple transformed values using SQL queries. This can be done without changing the existing data ingestion process or deploying additional resources. The transformed records can then be outputted to another Kinesis Data Firehose stream that delivers them to Amazon S3 for training the machine learning model. This approach will require the least amount of development effort, as it leverages the existing Kinesis Data Firehose stream and the built-in SQL capabilities of Kinesis Data Analytics.

References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

Anomaly Detection with Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 - Amazon Web Services

The most cost-effective solution is to use an S3 event to trigger a Lambda function that uses SageMaker Data Wrangler to merge the data. This solution avoids the need to provision and manage any additional resources, such as Kinesis streams, Firehose delivery streams, Glue jobs, or Redshift clusters. SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a visual interface to import, prepare, transform, and analyze data from various sources, including AWS Data Exchange products. It can also export the data preparation workflow to a Python script that can be executed by a Lambda function. This solution can meet the time requirement of 30-60 minutes, depending on the size and complexity of the data.

References:

Using Amazon S3 Event Notifications

Prepare ML Data with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

AWS Lambda Function

 The solution A will meet the requirements with the most operational efficiency because it uses Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler, which is a service that simplifies the process of data preparation and feature engineering for machine learning. The solution A involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to explore feature transformations. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a visual interface that allows data scientists to apply various transformations to their tabular data, such as encoding categorical features, scaling numerical features, imputing missing values, and more. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also supports custom transformations using Python code or SQL queries1.

Use SageMaker Data Wrangler templates for visualization. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also provides a set of templates that can generate visualizations of the data, such as histograms, scatter plots, box plots, and more. These visualizations can help data scientists to understand the distribution and characteristics of the data, and to compare the effects of different feature transformations1.

Export the feature processing workflow to a SageMaker pipeline for automation. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler can export the feature processing workflow as a SageMaker pipeline, which is a service that orchestrates and automates machine learning workflows. A SageMaker pipeline can run the feature processing steps as a preprocessing step, and then feed the output to a training step or an inference step. This can reduce the operational overhead of managing the feature processing workflow and ensure its consistency and reproducibility2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Using an Amazon SageMaker notebook instance to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to write the code for the feature transformations, the data storage, the data visualization, and the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Lambda has limitations on the execution time, memory size, and package size, which may not be sufficient for complex feature processing tasks3.

Option C: Using AWS Glue Studio with custom code to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. AWS Glue Studio is a visual interface that allows data engineers to create and run extract, transform, and load (ETL) jobs on AWS Glue. However, AWS Glue Studio does not provide preconfigured transformations or templates for feature engineering or data visualization. The data scientist will have to write custom code for these tasks, as well as for the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Glue Studio is not integrated with SageMaker pipelines, and it may not be optimized for machine learning workflows4.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, packaging each feature transformation step into a separate AWS Lambda function, and using AWS Step Functions for workflow automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to create and manage multiple AWS Lambda functions and AWS Step Functions, which can increase the complexity and cost of the solution. Moreover, AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions may not be compatible with SageMaker pipelines, and they may not be optimized for machine learning workflows5.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

2: Amazon SageMaker Pipelines

3: AWS Lambda

4: AWS Glue Studio

5: AWS Step Functions

Data normalization is a data preprocessing technique that scales the features to a common range, such as [0, 1] or [-1, 1]. This helps reduce the impact of features with high magnitude on the cost function and improves the convergence during backpropagation. Data normalization can be done using different methods, such as min-max scaling, z-score standardization, or unit vector normalization. Data normalization is different from dimensionality reduction, which reduces the number of features; model regularization, which adds a penalty term to the cost function to prevent overfitting; and data augmentation, which increases the amount of data by creating synthetic samples. References:

Data processing options for AI/ML | AWS Machine Learning Blog

Data preprocessing - Machine Learning Lens

How to Normalize Data Using scikit-learn in Python

Normalization | Machine Learning | Google for Developers

 The data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 can be improved by increasing the number of shards for the data stream. A shard is the base throughput unit of a Kinesis data stream. One shard provides 1 MB/second data input and 2 MB/second data output. Increasing the number of shards increases the data ingestion capacity of the stream. This can help reduce the backlog of data for Kinesis Data Streams and Kinesis Data Firehose to ingest.

References:

Shard - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

Scaling Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with AWS CloudFormation - AWS Big Data Blog

The solution that will accomplish the necessary transformation to train the Amazon SageMaker model with the least amount of administrative overhead is to crawl the data using AWS Glue crawlers, write an AWS Glue ETL job that merges the two tables and writes the output in CSV format to Amazon S3. This solution leverages the serverless capabilities of AWS Glue to automatically discover the schema of the data sources, and to perform the data integration and transformation without requiring any cluster management or configuration. The output in CSV format is compatible with Amazon SageMaker and can be easily loaded into a training job. References: AWS Glue, Amazon SageMaker

The best approaches to decrease the training time of the model are C and D, because they can improve the computational efficiency and parallelization of the training process. These approaches have the following benefits:

C: Replacing CPU-based EC2 instances with GPU-based EC2 instances can speed up the training of the DeepAR algorithm, as it can leverage the parallel processing power of GPUs to perform matrix operations and gradient computations faster than CPUs12. The DeepAR algorithm supports GPU-based EC2 instances such as ml.p2 and ml.p33.

D: Using multiple training instances can also reduce the training time of the DeepAR algorithm, as it can distribute the workload across multiple nodes and perform data parallelism4. The DeepAR algorithm supports distributed training with multiple CPU-based or GPU-based EC2 instances3.

The other options are not effective or relevant, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Replacing On-Demand Instances with Spot Instances can reduce the cost of the training, but not necessarily the time, as Spot Instances are subject to interruption and availability5. Moreover, the DeepAR algorithm does not support checkpointing, which means that the training cannot resume from the last saved state if the Spot Instance is terminated3.

B: Configuring model auto scaling dynamically to adjust the number of instances automatically is not applicable, as this feature is only available for inference endpoints, not for training jobs6.

E: Using a pre-trained version of the model and running incremental training is not possible, as the DeepAR algorithm does not support incremental training or transfer learning3. The DeepAR algorithm requires a full retraining of the model whenever new data is added or the hyperparameters are changed7.

References:

1: GPU vs CPU: What Matters Most for Machine Learning? | by Louis (What’s AI) Bouchard | Towards Data Science

2: How GPUs Accelerate Machine Learning Training | NVIDIA Developer Blog

3: DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

4: Distributed Training - Amazon SageMaker

5: Managed Spot Training - Amazon SageMaker

6: Automatic Scaling - Amazon SageMaker

7: How the DeepAR Algorithm Works - Amazon SageMaker

CNN-QR is a proprietary machine learning algorithm for forecasting time series using causal convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN-QR works best with large datasets containing hundreds of time series. It accepts item metadata, and is the only Forecast algorithm that accepts related time series data without future values. In this case, the power company has historical power consumption data for the last 10 years, which is a large dataset with multiple time series. The data also includes related data such as weather, number of individuals on the property, and public holidays, which can be used as item metadata or related time series data. Therefore, CNN-QR is the most suitable algorithm for this scenario. References: Amazon Forecast Algorithms, Amazon Forecast CNN-QR

The algorithms that are best suited to this scenario are latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and neural topic modeling (NTM), as they are both unsupervised learning methods that can discover abstract topics from a collection of text documents. LDA and NTM can provide a list of the top words for each topic, as well as the topic distribution for each document, which can help the auditors assess the relevance and priority of the topic12.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: A random forest classifier is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using an ensemble of decision trees. A random forest classifier is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes3.

Option D: A linear support vector machine is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using a linear function that separates the data into different classes. A linear support vector machine is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes4.

Option E: A linear regression is a supervised learning method that can perform regression tasks by using a linear function that models the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. A linear regression is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and a continuous output variable5.

References:

1: Latent Dirichlet Allocation

2: Neural Topic Modeling

3: Random Forest Classifier

4: Linear Support Vector Machine

5: Linear Regression

In a classification model, features with significantly larger scales can dominate the model training process, leading to poor performance. Normalization scales the values of continuous features to a uniform range, such as [0, 1], which prevents large-value features from disproportionately influencing the model. This is particularly beneficial for algorithms sensitive to the scale of input data, such as neural networks or distance-based algorithms.

Given that the problematic features are informative and representative of the target distribution, removing or bootstrapping these features is not advisable. Normalization will bring all features to a similar scale and improve the model's inference accuracy without losing important information.

A logarithmic transformation is a suitable data transformation for a linear regression model when the data has a skewed distribution, such as when the mode is lower than the median and the median is lower than the mean. A logarithmic transformation can reduce the skewness and make the data more symmetric and normally distributed, which are desirable properties for linear regression. A logarithmic transformation can also reduce the effect of outliers and heteroscedasticity (unequal variance) in the data. An exponential transformation would have the opposite effect of increasing the skewness and making the data more asymmetric. A polynomial transformation may not be able to capture the nonlinearity in the data and may introduce multicollinearity among the transformed variables. A sinusoidal transformation is not appropriate for data that does not have a periodic pattern.

References:

Data Transformation - Scaler Topics

Linear Regression - GeeksforGeeks

Linear Regression - Scribbr

To log Amazon SageMaker API calls, the team can use AWS CloudTrail, which is a service that provides a record of actions taken by a user, role, or an AWS service in SageMaker1. CloudTrail captures all API calls for SageMaker, with the exception of InvokeEndpoint and InvokeEndpointAsync, as events1. The calls captured include calls from the SageMaker console and code calls to the SageMaker API operations1. The team can create a trail to enable continuous delivery of CloudTrail events to an Amazon S3 bucket, and configure other AWS services to further analyze and act upon the event data collected in CloudTrail logs1. The auditors can view the CloudTrail log activity report in the CloudTrail console or download the log files from the S3 bucket1.

To receive a notification when the model is overfitting, the team can add code to push a custom metric to Amazon CloudWatch, which is a service that provides monitoring and observability for AWS resources and applications2. The team can use the MXNet metric API to define and compute the custom metric, such as the validation accuracy or the validation loss, and use the boto3 CloudWatch client to put the metric data to CloudWatch3 . The team can then create an alarm in CloudWatch with Amazon SNS to receive a notification when the custom metric crosses a threshold that indicates overfitting . For example, the team can set the alarm to trigger when the validation loss increases for a certain number of consecutive periods, which means the model is learning the noise in the training data and not generalizing well to the validation data.

References:

1: Log Amazon SageMaker API Calls with AWS CloudTrail - Amazon SageMaker

2: What Is Amazon CloudWatch? - Amazon CloudWatch

3: Metric API — Apache MXNet documentation

: CloudWatch — Boto 3 Docs 1.20.21 documentation

: Creating Amazon CloudWatch Alarms - Amazon CloudWatch

: What is Amazon Simple Notification Service? - Amazon Simple Notification Service

: Overfitting and Underfitting - Machine Learning Crash Course

Normalization is a data preprocessing technique that can be used to scale the input features to a common range, such as [-1, 1] or [0, 1]. Normalization can help reduce the effect of outliers, improve the convergence of gradient-based algorithms, and prevent variables with a larger magnitude from dominating the model. One common method of normalization is standardization, which transforms each feature to have a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. This can be done by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation of each feature. Standardization can be useful for models that assume the input features are normally distributed, such as linear regression, logistic regression, and support vector machines. References:

Data normalization and standardization: A video that explains the concept and benefits of data normalization and standardization.

Standardize or Normalize?: A blog post that compares different methods of scaling the input features.

 The best feature engineering strategy for this scenario is to apply dimensionality reduction by using the principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm. PCA is a technique that transforms a large set of correlated features into a smaller set of uncorrelated features called principal components. This can help reduce the complexity and noise in the data, improve the performance and interpretability of the model, and avoid overfitting. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in PCA algorithm that can be used to perform dimensionality reduction on tabular data. The ML specialist can use Amazon SageMaker to train and deploy the PCA model, and then use the output of the PCA model as the input for the classification model.

References:

Dimensionality Reduction with Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker PCA Algorithm

A sequential split is a method of splitting data into training and evaluation datasets while preserving the order of the data records. This method is useful when the data has a temporal or sequential structure, and the order of the data matters for the prediction task. For example, if the data contains sales data for different months or years, and the goal is to predict the sales for the next month or year, a sequential split can ensure that the training data comes from the earlier period and the evaluation data comes from the later period. This can help avoid data leakage, which occurs when the training data contains information from the future that is not available at the time of prediction. A sequential split can also help evaluate the model performance on the most recent data, which may be more relevant and representative of the future data.

In this question, Example Corp has sequential sales data from the past 15 years and wants to use Amazon ML to predict the sales for this year’s upcoming annual sale event. A sequential split is the most appropriate method for splitting the data, as it can preserve the order of the data and prevent data leakage. For example, Example Corp can use the data from the first 14 years as the training dataset, and the data from the last year as the evaluation dataset. This way, the model can learn from the historical data and be tested on the most recent data.

Amazon ML provides an option to split the data sequentially when creating the training and evaluation datasources. To use this option, Example Corp can specify the percentage of the data to use for training and evaluation, and Amazon ML will use the first part of the data for training and the remaining part of the data for evaluation. For more information, see Splitting Your Data - Amazon Machine Learning.

Based on the figure provided, the data is not linearly separable. Therefore, a non-linear model such as SVM with a non-linear kernel would be the best choice. SVMs are particularly effective in high-dimensional spaces and are versatile in that they can be used for both linear and non-linear data. Additionally, SVMs have a high level of accuracy and are less prone to overfitting1

References: 1:

 The best solution to reduce the cost of the notebook instance and the data preprocessing job is to change the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance, stop the notebook when it is not in use, and run data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing. This solution will result in the most cost savings because:

Changing the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance will reduce the hourly cost of running the notebook, since the feature engineering development does not require high CPU and memory resources. For example, an ml.t3.medium instance costs $0.0464 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance costs $0.888 per hour1.

Stopping the notebook when it is not in use will also reduce the cost, since the notebook will only incur charges when it is running. For example, if the notebook is used for 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, then stopping it when it is not in use will save about 76% of the monthly cost compared to leaving it running all the time2.

Running data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the ml.r5 instance is optimized for memory-intensive workloads and has a lower cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 instance. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 128 GB of memory and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Therefore, the ml.r5.4xlarge instance can process the same amount of data in half the time and at a lower cost than the ml.m5.4xlarge instance. Moreover, using Amazon SageMaker Processing will allow the data preprocessing job to run on a separate, fully managed infrastructure that can be scaled up or down as needed, without affecting the notebook instance.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because changing the notebook instance type to a memory optimized instance with the same vCPU number as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance has will not reduce the cost of the notebook, since the memory optimized instances have a higher cost per vCPU than the general-purpose instances. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, running both data preprocessing and feature engineering development on the same instance will not take advantage of the scalability and flexibility of Amazon SageMaker Processing.

Option B is not suitable because running data preprocessing on a P3 instance type with the same memory as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the P3 instance type is optimized for GPU-based workloads and has a higher cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 or ml.r5 instance types. For example, an ml.p3.2xlarge instance has 61 GB of memory and costs $3.06 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, the data preprocessing job does not require GPU, so using a P3 instance type will be wasteful and inefficient.

Option D is not feasible because running data preprocessing on an R5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using the Reserved Instance option will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the Reserved Instance option requires a commitment to a consistent amount of usage for a period of 1 or 3 years3. However, the data preprocessing job only runs once a day on average and completes in only 2 hours, so it does not have a consistent or predictable usage pattern. Therefore, using the Reserved Instance option will not provide any cost savings and may incur additional charges for unused capacity.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Pricing

Manage Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 Pricing - Reserved Instances

Amazon Personalize is a fully managed machine learning service that makes it easy for developers to create personalized user experiences at scale. It uses the same recommender system technology that Amazon uses to create its own personalized recommendations. Amazon Personalize provides several pre-built recipes that can be used to train models for different use cases. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is designed to provide personalized recommendations for existing users based on their past interactions with items. The PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe is designed to re-rank a list of items for a user based on their preferences. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is more suitable for this use case because it can generate recommendations for each user without requiring a list of candidate items. To filter out the items that the user previously purchased, a real-time filter can be created and applied to the campaign. A real-time filter is a dynamic filter that uses the latest interaction data to exclude items from the recommendations. By using Amazon Personalize, the development effort is minimized because it handles the data processing, model training, and deployment automatically. The web application can use the GetRecommendations API operation to get the real-time recommendations from the campaign. References:

Amazon Personalize

What is Amazon Personalize?

USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe

PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe

Filtering recommendations

GetRecommendations API operation

Option A is correct because SageMaker Pipelines is a service that enables you to create and manage automated workflows for your machine learning projects. You can use SageMaker Pipelines to orchestrate the steps of data extraction, model training, and model deployment in a repeatable and scalable way1.

Option B is correct because SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that monitors the quality of your models in production and alerts you when there are deviations in the model quality. You can use SageMaker Model Monitor to set an accuracy threshold for your model and configure a CloudWatch alarm that triggers when the threshold is exceeded. You can then connect the alarm to the workflow in SageMaker Pipelines to automatically initiate retraining and deployment of a new version of the model2.

Option C is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Creating a daily SageMaker Processing job that reads the predictions from Amazon S3 and checks for changes in model prediction accuracy is a manual and time-consuming process. It also requires you to write custom code to perform the data analysis and send the email notification. Moreover, it does not automatically retrain and deploy the model when the accuracy drops.

Option D is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Rerunning the steps in the Jupyter notebook that is hosted on SageMaker Studio notebooks to retrain the model and redeploy a new version of the model is a manual and error-prone process. It also requires you to monitor the model’s performance and initiate the retraining and deployment steps yourself. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

Option E is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Exporting the training and deployment code from the SageMaker Studio notebooks into a Python script and packaging the script into an Amazon ECS task that an AWS Lambda function can initiate is a complex and cumbersome process. It also requires you to manage the infrastructure and resources for the Amazon ECS task and the AWS Lambda function. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

References:

1: SageMaker Pipelines - Amazon SageMaker

2: Monitor data and model quality - Amazon SageMaker

A private subnet is a subnet that does not have a route to the internet gateway, which means that the resources in the private subnet cannot access the internet or be accessed from the internet. An S3 VPC endpoint is a gateway endpoint that allows the resources in the VPC to access the S3 service without going through the internet. By launching the notebook instances in a private subnet and accessing the data through an S3 VPC endpoint, the company can set up the job in a secure and compliant way, as the data never leaves the AWS network and is not exposed to the internet. This can also improve the performance and reliability of the data transfer, as the traffic does not depend on the internet bandwidth or availability.

References:

Amazon VPC Endpoints - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Endpoints for Amazon S3 - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Working with VPCs and Subnets - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

The best solution to verify the suitability of an ARIMA approach is to use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Seasonal-Trend decomposition, which can be used to decompose a time series into its trend, seasonal, and residual components. This analysis can help the developer understand the patterns and characteristics of the time series, such as stationarity, seasonality, and autocorrelation, which are important for choosing an appropriate ARIMA model. Data Wrangler also provides built-in transformations that can help the developer handle missing data, such as imputing with mean, median, mode, or constant values, or dropping rows with missing values. Imputing missing data can help avoid gaps and irregularities in the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model performance. Data Wrangler also allows the developer to export the prepared data and the analysis code to various destinations, such as SageMaker Processing, SageMaker Pipelines, or SageMaker Feature Store, for further processing and modeling.

The other options are not suitable for verifying the suitability of an ARIMA approach. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot is a feature-set that automates key tasks of an automatic machine learning (AutoML) process. It explores the data, selects the algorithms relevant to the problem type, and prepares the data to facilitate model training and tuning. However, Autopilot does not support ARIMA as a machine learning problem type, and it does not provide any visualization or analysis of the time series data. Resampling data by using the aggregate daily total can reduce the granularity and resolution of the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model accuracy and applicability.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Transform and Export

•Amazon SageMaker Autopilot

•ARIMA Model – Complete Guide to Time Series Forecasting in Python

Amazon Redshift ML enables in-database machine learning model creation and predictions, allowing data scientists to leverage Redshift for model training without needing to export data.

To create and run a model for customer churn prediction in Amazon Redshift ML:

Define the feature variables and target variable: Identify the columns to use as features (predictors) and the target variable (outcome) for the churn prediction model.

Create the model: Write a CREATE MODEL SQL statement, which trains the model using Amazon Redshift’s integration with Amazon SageMaker and stores the model directly in Redshift.

Run predictions: Use the SQL PREDICT function to generate predictions on new data directly within Redshift.

Options B, D, and E are not required as Redshift ML handles model creation and prediction without manual data export to Amazon S3 or additional Spectrum integration.

The solution C will improve the computational efficiency of the models because it uses Amazon SageMaker Debugger and pruning, which are techniques that can reduce the size and complexity of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models. The solution C involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to gain visibility into the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs. Amazon SageMaker Debugger is a service that can capture and analyze the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can provide insights into the model performance, quality, and convergence. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can also help to identify and diagnose issues such as overfitting, underfitting, vanishing gradients, and exploding gradients1.

Compute the filter ranks based on the training information. Filter ranking is a technique that can measure the importance of each filter in a convolutional layer based on some criterion, such as the average percentage of zero activations or the L1-norm of the filter weights. Filter ranking can help to identify the filters that have little or no contribution to the model output, and thus can be removed without affecting the model accuracy2.

Apply pruning to remove the low-ranking filters. Pruning is a technique that can reduce the size and complexity of a neural network by removing the redundant or irrelevant parts of the network, such as neurons, connections, or filters. Pruning can help to improve the computational efficiency, memory usage, and inference speed of the model, as well as to prevent overfitting and improve generalization3.

Set the new weights based on the pruned set of filters. After pruning, the model will have a smaller and simpler architecture, with fewer filters in each convolutional layer. The new weights of the model can be set based on the pruned set of filters, either by initializing them randomly or by fine-tuning them from the original weights4.

Run a new training job with the pruned model. The pruned model can be trained again with the same or a different dataset, using the same or a different framework or algorithm. The new training job can use the same or a different configuration of Amazon SageMaker, such as the instance type, the hyperparameters, or the data ingestion mode. The new training job can also use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to monitor and analyze the training process and the model quality5.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Using Amazon CloudWatch metrics to gain visibility into the SageMaker training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs will not be as effective as using Amazon SageMaker Debugger. Amazon CloudWatch is a service that can monitor and observe the operational health and performance of AWS resources and applications. Amazon CloudWatch can provide metrics, alarms, dashboards, and logs for various AWS services, including Amazon SageMaker. However, Amazon CloudWatch does not provide the same level of granularity and detail as Amazon SageMaker Debugger for the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon CloudWatch metrics are mainly focused on the resource utilization and the training progress, not on the model performance, quality, and convergence6.

Option B: Using Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to build and run data labeling workflows and collecting a larger labeled dataset with the labeling workflows will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is a service that can create high-quality training datasets for machine learning by using human labelers. A larger labeled dataset can help to improve the model accuracy and generalization, but it will not reduce the memory, battery, and hardware consumption of the model. Moreover, a larger labeled dataset may increase the training time and cost of the model7.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to gain visibility into the ModelLatency metric and OverheadLatency metric of the model after the company deploys the model and increasing the model learning rate will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that can monitor and analyze the quality and performance of machine learning models that are deployed on Amazon SageMaker endpoints. The ModelLatency metric and the OverheadLatency metric can measure the inference latency of the model and the endpoint, respectively. However, these metrics do not provide any information about the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs of the model, which are needed for pruning. Moreover, increasing the model learning rate will not reduce the size and complexity of the model, but it may affect the model convergence and accuracy.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Debugger

2: Pruning Convolutional Neural Networks for Resource Efficient Inference

3: Pruning Neural Networks: A Survey

4: Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks

5: Amazon SageMaker Training Jobs

6: Amazon CloudWatch Metrics for Amazon SageMaker

7: Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth

: Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor

Residuals are the differences between the actual and predicted values of the target variable in a regression model. A histogram of residuals is a graphical tool that can help evaluate the performance and assumptions of the model. Ideally, the histogram of residuals should have a zero-centered bell shape, which indicates that the residuals are normally distributed with a mean of zero and a constant variance. This means that the model has captured the true relationship between the input and output variables, and that the errors are random and unbiased. However, if the histogram of residuals does not have a zero-centered bell shape, as shown in the image, this means that the model might have prediction errors over a range of target values. This is because the residuals do not form a symmetrical and homogeneous distribution around zero, which implies that the model has some systematic bias or heteroscedasticity. This can affect the accuracy and validity of the model, and indicate that the model needs to be improved or modified.

References:

Residual Analysis in Regression - Statistics By Jim

How to Check Residual Plots for Regression Analysis - dummies

Histogram of Residuals - Statistics How To

For a model with low accuracy on both training and testing datasets, the following two strategies are effective:

Increase the number of passes and perform hyperparameter tuning: This approach allows the model to better learn from the existing data and improve performance through optimized hyperparameters.

Add domain-specific features and use more complex models: Adding relevant features that capture additional information from domain knowledge and using more complex model architectures can help the model capture patterns better, potentially improving accuracy.

Options B, D, and E would either reduce feature complexity or training data volume, which is less likely to improve performance when accuracy is low on both training and testing sets.

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that enables you to analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. You can use Kinesis Data Analytics to process and gain insights from data streams such as web logs, clickstreams, IoT data, and more.

To use SQL to query a data stream of GZIP files, you need to first transform the data into a format that Kinesis Data Analytics can understand, such as JSON, CSV, or Apache Parquet. You can use an AWS Lambda function to perform this transformation and send the output to a Kinesis data stream that is connected to your Kinesis Data Analytics application. This way, you can use SQL to query the stream with the least latency, as Lambda functions are triggered in near real time by the incoming data and Kinesis Data Analytics can process the data as soon as it arrives.

The other options are not optimal for this scenario, as they introduce more latency or complexity. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can perform ETL (extract, transform, and load) tasks on data sources, but it is not designed for real-time streaming data analysis. An Amazon Kinesis Client Library is a Java library that enables you to build custom applications that process data from Kinesis data streams, but it requires more coding and configuration than using a Lambda function. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can deliver streaming data to destinations such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon OpenSearch Service, and Splunk, but it does not support SQL queries on the data.

References:

What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for SQL Applications?

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

The best options to use an Inception neural network architecture instead of a ResNet architecture for image classification in Amazon SageMaker are:

Bundle a Docker container with TensorFlow Estimator loaded with an Inception network and use this for model training. This option allows users to customize the training environment and use any TensorFlow model they want. Users can create a Docker image that contains the TensorFlow Estimator API and the Inception model from the TensorFlow Hub, and push it to Amazon ECR. Then, users can use the SageMaker Estimator class to train the model using the custom Docker image and the training data from Amazon S3.

Use custom code in Amazon SageMaker with TensorFlow Estimator to load the model with an Inception network and use this for model training. This option allows users to use the built-in TensorFlow container provided by SageMaker and write custom code to load and train the Inception model. Users can use the TensorFlow Estimator class to specify the custom code and the training data from Amazon S3. The custom code can use the TensorFlow Hub module to load the Inception model and fine-tune it on the training data.

The other options are not feasible for this scenario because:

Customize the built-in image classification algorithm to use Inception and use this for model training. This option is not possible because the built-in image classification algorithm in SageMaker does not support customizing the neural network architecture. The built-in algorithm only supports ResNet models with different depths and widths.

Create a support case with the SageMaker team to change the default image classification algorithm to Inception. This option is not realistic because the SageMaker team does not provide such a service. Users cannot request the SageMaker team to change the default algorithm or add new algorithms to the built-in ones.

Download and apt-get install the inception network code into an Amazon EC2 instance and use this instance as a Jupyter notebook in Amazon SageMaker. This option is not advisable because it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker, such as managed training and deployment, distributed training, and automatic model tuning. Users would have to manually install and configure the Inception network code and the TensorFlow framework on the EC2 instance, and run the training and inference code on the same instance, which may not be optimal for performance and scalability.

References:

Use Your Own Algorithms or Models with Amazon SageMaker

Use the SageMaker TensorFlow Serving Container

TensorFlow Hub

When a model shows poor accuracy on both the training and test datasets, it often indicates underfitting. To improve the model’s accuracy, the data scientist can:

Decrease regularization: Excessive regularization can lead to underfitting by constraining the model too much. Reducing it allows the model to capture more complexity.

Increase the number of training examples: Adding more data can help the model learn better and generalize well, especially if the dataset was previously insufficient.

Increase the number of model features: Adding relevant features can help the model capture more predictive information, thus potentially improving accuracy.

Options A, D, and F would either reduce the complexity or impact the generalization capability, which is not desirable in the case of underfitting.

 A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier is a suitable architecture for image classification tasks, as it can learn features from the images and reduce the dimensionality of the input. A linear output layer that outputs the probability that an image contains a car is appropriate for a binary classification problem, as it can produce a single scalar value between 0 and 1. A softmax output layer is more suitable for a multi-class classification problem, as it can produce a vector of probabilities that sum up to 1. A deep multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier is not as effective as a CNN for image classification, as it does not exploit the spatial structure of the images and requires a large number of parameters to process the high-dimensional input. References:

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Training - Machine Learning on AWS

AWS Whitepaper - An Overview of Machine Learning on AWS

The Data Scientist should increase the XGBoost scale_pos_weight parameter to adjust the balance of positive and negative weights and change the XGBoost eval_metric parameter to optimize based on Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). This will help reduce the number of false negative predictions by the model.

The scale_pos_weight parameter controls the balance of positive and negative weights in the XGBoost algorithm. It is useful for imbalanced classification problems, such as fraud detection, where the number of positive examples (fraudulent transactions) is much smaller than the number of negative examples (non-fraudulent transactions). By increasing the scale_pos_weight parameter, the Data Scientist can assign more weight to the positive class and make the model more sensitive to detecting fraudulent transactions.

The eval_metric parameter specifies the metric that is used to measure the performance of the model during training and validation. The default metric for binary classification problems is the error rate, which is the fraction of incorrect predictions. However, the error rate is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it does not take into account the cost of different types of errors. For example, in fraud detection, a false negative (failing to detect a fraudulent transaction) is more costly than a false positive (flagging a non-fraudulent transaction as fraudulent). Therefore, the Data Scientist should use a metric that reflects the trade-off between the true positive rate (TPR) and the false positive rate (FPR), such as the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). The AUC is a measure of how well the model can distinguish between the positive and negative classes, regardless of the classification threshold. A higher AUC means that the model can achieve a higher TPR with a lower FPR, which is desirable for fraud detection.

References:

XGBoost Parameters - Amazon Machine Learning

Using XGBoost with Amazon SageMaker - AWS Machine Learning Blog

Feature selection is the process of selecting a subset of extracted features that are relevant and contribute to minimizing the error rate of a trained model. Some techniques for feature selection are:

Correlation plot with heat maps: This technique visualizes the correlation between features using a color-coded matrix. Features that are highly correlated with each other or with the target variable can be identified and removed to reduce redundancy and noise.

Univariate selection: This technique evaluates each feature individually based on a statistical test, such as chi-square, ANOVA, or mutual information, and selects the features that have the highest scores or p-values. This technique is simple and fast, but it does not consider the interactions between features.

Feature importance with a tree-based classifier: This technique uses a tree-based classifier, such as random forest or gradient boosting, to rank the features based on their importance in splitting the nodes. Features that have low importance scores can be dropped from the model. This technique can capture the non-linear relationships and interactions between features.

The other options are not techniques for feature selection, but rather for feature engineering, which is the process of creating, transforming, or extracting features from the original data. Feature engineering can improve the performance and interpretability of the model, but it does not reduce the number of features.

Data scaling with standardization and normalization: This technique transforms the features to have a common scale, such as zero mean and unit variance, or a range between 0 and 1. This technique can help some algorithms, such as k-means or logistic regression, to converge faster and avoid numerical instability, but it does not change the number of features.

Data binning: This technique groups the continuous features into discrete bins or categories based on some criteria, such as equal width, equal frequency, or clustering. This technique can reduce the noise and outliers in the data, and also create ordinal or nominal features that can be used for some algorithms, such as decision trees or naive Bayes, but it does not reduce the number of features.

Data augmentation: This technique generates new data from the existing data by applying some transformations, such as rotation, flipping, cropping, or noise addition. This technique can increase the size and diversity of the data, and help prevent overfitting, but it does not reduce the number of features.

References:

Feature engineering - Machine Learning Lens

Amazon SageMaker Autopilot now provides feature selection and the ability to change data types while creating an AutoML experiment

Feature Selection in Machine Learning | Baeldung on Computer Science

Feature Selection in Machine Learning: An easy Introduction

The best approach to address all of the requirements with the least development effort is to create an AWS Glue job, convert the scripts to PySpark, execute the pipeline, and store the results in Amazon S3. This is because:

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics 1. AWS Glue can run Python and Scala scripts to process data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Redshift, and more 2. AWS Glue also provides a serverless Apache Spark environment to run ETL jobs, eliminating the need to provision and manage servers 3.

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, a unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing 4. PySpark can perform various data transformations and manipulations on structured and unstructured data, such as cleaning, enriching, and compressing 5. PySpark can also leverage the distributed computing power of Spark to handle terabytes of data efficiently and scalably 6.

By creating an AWS Glue job and converting the scripts to PySpark, the company can move the scripts out of Amazon EC2 into a more managed solution that will eliminate the need to maintain servers. The company can also reduce the development effort by using the AWS Glue console, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and run the job 7. Moreover, the company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to store and manage the metadata of the data sources and targets 8.

The other options are not as suitable as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because loading the data into an Amazon Redshift cluster and executing the pipeline by using SQL will incur additional costs and complexity for the company. Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse service that enables fast and scalable analysis of structured data . However, it is not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, using SQL to perform these tasks may not be as expressive and flexible as using Python scripts. Furthermore, the company will have to provision and configure the Amazon Redshift cluster, and load and unload the data from Amazon S3, which will increase the development effort and time.

Option B is not feasible because loading the data into Amazon DynamoDB and converting the scripts to an AWS Lambda function will not work for the company’s use case. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value and document database service that provides fast and consistent performance at any scale . However, it is not suitable for storing and processing terabytes of data daily, as it has limits on the size and throughput of each table and item . Moreover, using AWS Lambda to execute the pipeline will not be efficient or cost-effective, as Lambda has limits on the memory, CPU, and execution time of each function . Therefore, using Amazon DynamoDB and AWS Lambda will not meet the company’s requirements for processing large amounts of data quickly and reliably.

Option D is not relevant because creating a set of individual AWS Lambda functions to execute each of the scripts and building a step function by using the AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK will not address the main issue of moving the scripts out of Amazon EC2. AWS Step Functions is a fully managed service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows . The AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK is an open source library that allows data scientists to easily create workflows that process and publish machine learning models using Amazon SageMaker and AWS Step Functions . However, these services and tools are not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, as mentioned in option B, using AWS Lambda to execute the scripts will not be efficient or cost-effective for the company’s use case.

References:

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Serverless Spark ETL

PySpark - Overview

PySpark - RDD

PySpark - SparkContext

Adding Jobs in AWS Glue

Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog

[What Is Amazon Redshift?]

[What Is Amazon DynamoDB?]

[Service, Account, and Table Quotas in DynamoDB]

[AWS Lambda quotas]

[What Is AWS Step Functions?]

[AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK for Python]

The correct solution for granting permissions for data preprocessing is to use the following steps:

Create an IAM role that has permissions to create Amazon SageMaker Processing jobs. Attach the role to the SageMaker notebook instance. This role allows the ML specialist to run Processing jobs from the notebook code1

Create an Amazon SageMaker Processing job with an IAM role that has read and write permissions to the relevant S3 bucket, and appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This role allows the Processing job to access the data in the encrypted S3 bucket, decrypt it with the KMS CMK, and pull the container image from ECR23

The other options are incorrect because they either miss some permissions or use unnecessary steps. For example:

Option A uses a single IAM role for both the notebook instance and the Processing job. This role may have more permissions than necessary for the notebook instance, which violates the principle of least privilege4

Option C sets up both an S3 endpoint and a KMS endpoint in the default VPC. These endpoints are not required for the Processing job to access the data in the encrypted S3 bucket. They are only needed if the Processing job runs in network isolation mode, which is not specified in the question.

Option D uses the access key and secret key of the IAM user with appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This is not a secure way to pass credentials to the Processing job. It also requires the ML specialist to manage the IAM user and the keys.

References:

1: Create an Amazon SageMaker Notebook Instance - Amazon SageMaker

2: Create a Processing Job - Amazon SageMaker

3: Use AWS KMS–Managed Encryption Keys - Amazon Simple Storage Service

4: IAM Best Practices - AWS Identity and Access Management

: Network Isolation - Amazon SageMaker

: Understanding and Getting Your Security Credentials - AWS General Reference

Amazon Rekognition is a service that provides computer vision capabilities for image and video analysis, such as object, scene, and activity detection, face and text recognition, and custom label detection. Amazon Rekognition can be used to automate the quality control process for plaques by comparing the images of the plaques with the images of defects in the Amazon S3 bucket and returning a confidence score for each defect. Amazon A2I is a service that enables human review of machine learning predictions, such as low-confidence predictions from Amazon Rekognition. Amazon A2I can be integrated with a private workforce option, which allows the engraving company to use its own internal team of reviewers to manually inspect the plaques that are flagged by Amazon Rekognition. This solution meets the requirements of automating the quality control process, sending low-confidence predictions to an internal team of reviewers, and using Amazon A2I for manual review. References:

1: Amazon Rekognition documentation

2: Amazon A2I documentation

3: Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels documentation

4: Amazon A2I Private Workforce documentation

The best storage scheme for this scenario is to store datasets as files in Amazon S3. Amazon S3 is a scalable, cost-effective, and durable object storage service that can store any amount and type of data. Amazon S3 also supports querying data using SQL with Amazon Athena, a serverless interactive query service that can analyze data directly in S3. This way, the Data Science team can easily explore and analyze their datasets without having to load them into a database or a compute instance.

The other options are not as suitable for this scenario because:

Storing datasets as files in an Amazon EBS volume attached to an Amazon EC2 instance would limit the scalability and availability of the data, as EBS volumes are only accessible within a single availability zone and have a maximum size of 16 TiB. Also, EBS volumes are more expensive than S3 buckets and require provisioning and managing EC2 instances.

Storing datasets as tables in a multi-node Amazon Redshift cluster would incur higher costs and complexity than using S3 and Athena. Amazon Redshift is a data warehouse service that is optimized for analytical queries over structured or semi-structured data. However, it requires setting up and maintaining a cluster of nodes, loading data into tables, and choosing the right distribution and sort keys for optimal performance. Moreover, Amazon Redshift charges for both storage and compute, while S3 and Athena only charge for the amount of data stored and scanned, respectively.

Storing datasets as global tables in Amazon DynamoDB would not be feasible for large amounts of data, as DynamoDB is a key-value and document database service that is designed for fast and consistent performance at any scale. However, DynamoDB has a limit of 400 KB per item and 25 GB per partition key value, which may not be enough for storing large datasets. Also, DynamoDB does not support SQL queries natively, and would require using a service like Amazon EMR or AWS Glue to run SQL queries over DynamoDB data.

References:

Amazon S3 - Cloud Object Storage

Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Queries for Data in Amazon S3

Amazon EBS - Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)

Amazon Redshift – Data Warehouse Solution - AWS

Amazon DynamoDB – NoSQL Cloud Database Service

The goal of classification is to determine to which class or category a data point (customer in our case) belongs to. For classification problems, data scientists would use historical data with predefined target variables AKA labels (churner/non-churner) – answers that need to be predicted – to train an algorithm. With classification, businesses can answer the following questions:

Will this customer churn or not?

Will a customer renew their subscription?

Will a user downgrade a pricing plan?

Are there any signs of unusual customer behavior?

The solution D is the best data visualization approach to determine the optimal value of k for the k-means clustering algorithm. The solution D involves the following steps:

Run the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k. For each value of k, calculate the sum of squared errors (SSE). The SSE is a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. It is calculated by summing the squared distances of each data point to its closest cluster center. A lower SSE indicates a better fit, but it will always decrease as the number of clusters increases. Therefore, the goal is to find the smallest value of k that still has a low SSE1.

Plot a line chart of the SSE for each value of k. The line chart will show how the SSE changes as the value of k increases. Typically, the line chart will have a shape of an elbow, where the SSE drops rapidly at first and then levels off. The optimal value of k is the point after which the curve starts decreasing in a linear fashion. This point is also known as the elbow point, and it represents the balance between the number of clusters and the SSE1.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Calculating the principal component analysis (PCA) components, running the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k by using only the first two PCA components, and creating a scatter plot with a different color for each cluster will not accurately determine the optimal value of k. PCA is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by transforming it into a new set of features that capture the most variance in the data. However, PCA may not preserve the original structure and distances of the data, and it may lose some information in the process. Therefore, running the k-means clustering algorithm on the PCA components may not reflect the true clusters in the data. Moreover, using only the first two PCA components may not capture enough variance to represent the data well. Furthermore, creating a scatter plot may not be reliable, as it depends on the subjective judgment of the data scientist to decide when the clusters look reasonably separated2.

Option B: Calculating the PCA components and creating a line plot of the number of components against the explained variance will not determine the optimal value of k. This approach is used to determine the optimal number of PCA components to use for dimensionality reduction, not for clustering. The explained variance is the ratio of the variance of each PCA component to the total variance of the data. The optimal number of PCA components is the point where adding more components does not significantly increase the explained variance. However, this number may not correspond to the optimal number of clusters, as PCA and k-means clustering have different objectives and assumptions2.

Option C: Creating a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot for a range of perplexity values will not determine the optimal value of k. t-SNE is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by embedding it into a lower-dimensional space, such as a two-dimensional plane. t-SNE preserves the local structure and distances of the data, and it can reveal clusters and patterns in the data. However, t-SNE does not assign labels or centroids to the clusters, and it does not provide a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. Therefore, t-SNE cannot determine the optimal number of clusters, as it only visualizes the data. Moreover, t-SNE depends on the perplexity parameter, which is a measure of how many neighbors each point considers. The perplexity parameter can affect the shape and size of the clusters, and there is no optimal value for it. Therefore, creating a t-SNE plot for a range of perplexity values may not be consistent or reliable3.

References:

1: How to Determine the Optimal K for K-Means?

2: Principal Component Analysis

3: t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding

To secure calls to the Amazon SageMaker Service API, the ML specialist should take the following steps:

Modify the security group on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances. This will allow the ML specialist to control which instances in the VPC can communicate with the VPC interface endpoint for the Amazon SageMaker Service API. The security group can specify inbound and outbound rules based on the instance IDs, IP addresses, or CIDR blocks1.

Add a SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface to the VPC. This will allow the ML specialist to invoke the SageMaker endpoints from within the VPC without using the public internet. The SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface connects the VPC directly to the SageMaker Runtime using AWS PrivateLink2.

The other options are not as effective or necessary as the steps above. Adding a VPC endpoint policy to allow access to the IAM users is not required, as the IAM users can already access the Amazon SageMaker Service API through the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the users’ IAM policy to allow access to Amazon SageMaker Service API calls only is not sufficient, as it does not prevent unauthorized instances from accessing the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the ACL on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances is not possible, as network ACLs are associated with subnets, not network interfaces3.

References:

Security groups for your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Network ACLs - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

 Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are technologies that meet the company’s requirements for a temporary ad hoc solution for machine learning data storage and query. Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena have the following features and benefits:

Amazon S3 is a service that provides scalable, durable, and secure object storage for any type of data. Amazon S3 can store csv and JSON files, as well as other formats, and can handle large volumes of data with high availability and performance. Amazon S3 also integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, for further processing and analysis of the data.

Amazon Athena is a service that allows querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena can query over semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as structured data, such as csv, without requiring any loading or transformation. Amazon Athena is serverless, meaning that there is no infrastructure to manage and users only pay for the queries they run. Amazon Athena also supports the use of AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository that can store and manage the schema and partition information of the data in Amazon S3.

Using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena, the company can achieve the following high priorities:

Solution simplicity: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are easy to use and require minimal configuration and maintenance. The company can simply upload the csv and JSON files to Amazon S3 and use Amazon Athena to query them using SQL. The company does not need to worry about provisioning, scaling, or managing any servers or clusters.

Fast development time: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena can enable the company to quickly access and analyze the data without any data preparation or loading. The company can use the existing workforce of SQL experts to write and run queries on Amazon Athena and get results in seconds or minutes.

Low cost: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are cost-effective and offer pay-as-you-go pricing models. Amazon S3 charges based on the amount of storage used and the number of requests made. Amazon Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned by the queries. The company can also reduce the costs by using compression, encryption, and partitioning techniques to optimize the data storage and query performance.

High flexibility: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are flexible and can support various data types, formats, and sources. The company can store and query any type of data in Amazon S3, such as csv, JSON, Parquet, ORC, etc. The company can also query data from multiple sources in Amazon S3, such as data lakes, data warehouses, log files, etc.

The other options are not as suitable as option A for the company’s requirements for the following reasons:

Option B: Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue are technologies that can be used for data warehousing and data integration, but they are not ideal for a temporary ad hoc solution. Amazon Redshift is a service that provides a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse that can run complex analytical queries using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that can prepare and load data for analytics. However, using Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue would require more effort and cost than using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon Redshift cluster, which can be complex and expensive.

Option C: Amazon DynamoDB and DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) are technologies that can be used for fast and scalable NoSQL database and caching, but they are not suitable for the company’s data storage and query needs. Amazon DynamoDB is a service that provides a fully managed, key-value and document database that can deliver single-digit millisecond performance at any scale. DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is a service that provides a fully managed, in-memory cache for DynamoDB that can improve the read performance by up to 10 times. However, using Amazon DynamoDB and DAX would not allow the company to continue to use SQL as a query language, as Amazon DynamoDB does not support SQL. The company would need to use the DynamoDB API or the AWS SDKs to access and query the data, which can require more coding and learning effort. The company would also need to transform the csv and JSON files into DynamoDB items, which can involve additional processing and complexity.

Option D: Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are technologies that can be used for relational database and search and analytics, but they are not optimal for the company’s data storage and query scenario. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a fully managed, relational database that supports various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon ES is a service that provides a fully managed, Elasticsearch cluster, which is mainly used for search and analytics purposes. However, using Amazon RDS and Amazon ES would not be as simple and cost-effective as using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon RDS and Amazon ES clusters, which can be complex and expensive. Moreover, Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are not designed to handle semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena.

References:

Amazon S3

Amazon Athena

Amazon Redshift

AWS Glue

Amazon DynamoDB

[DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)]

[Amazon RDS]

[Amazon ES]

The data scientist should remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit-learn library, and replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer. This is because:

The Count Vectorizer function is a tool that can convert a collection of text documents to a matrix of token counts 1. It also enables the pre-processing of text data prior to generating the vector representation, such as removing accents, converting to lowercase, and filtering out stop words 1. By using this function, the data scientist can remove the stop words such as “a,” “an,” and “the” from the blog post data, and obtain a numerical representation of the text that can be used as input for the NTM algorithm.

The NTM algorithm is a neural network-based topic modeling technique that can learn latent topics from a corpus of documents 2. It can be used to recommend tags from blog posts by finding the most probable topics for each document, and ranking the words associated with each topic 3. However, the NTM algorithm does not perform any text pre-processing by itself, so it relies on the quality of the input data. Therefore, the data scientist should replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer, to ensure that the NTM algorithm does not include the stop words in the tag recommendations.

The other options are not suitable for the following reasons:

Option A is not relevant because the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations are used to detect and extract named entities from text, such as people, places, organizations, dates, etc4. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are common words that do not carry much meaning or information. Moreover, removing the detected entities from the blog post data may reduce the quality and diversity of the tag recommendations, as some entities may be relevant and useful as tags.

Option B is not optimal because the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is used to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset by finding the most important features that capture the maximum amount of variance in the data 5. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are words that have low variance and high frequency in the data. Moreover, replacing the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the PCA algorithm may not be compatible with the input format expected by the NTM algorithm, which requires a bag-of-words representation of the text 2.

Option C is not suitable because the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm is used to detect and localize objects in images 6. This is not related to the task of recommending tags from blog posts, which are text documents. Moreover, using the Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm would require a different type of input data (images instead of text), and a different type of output data (bounding boxes and labels instead of topics and words).

References:

Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Introduction to the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model

Amazon Comprehend - Entity Recognition

sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm

Object Detection Algorithm

According to the Amazon Kinesis Data Streams documentation, the maximum size of data blob (the data payload before Base64-encoding) per record is 1 MB. The maximum number of records that can be sent to a shard per second is 1,000. Therefore, the maximum throughput of a shard is 1 MB/sec for input and 2 MB/sec for output. In this case, the input throughput is 100 transactions per second * 100 KB per transaction = 10 MB/sec. Therefore, the minimum number of shards required is 10 MB/sec / 1 MB/sec = 10 shards. However, the question asks for the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams, not the minimum number of shards per stream. A Kinesis Data Streams account can have multiple streams, each with its own number of shards. Therefore, the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams is 1, which is the minimum number of shards per stream. References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Terminology and Concepts

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Limits

The best way to meet the requirements is to use a principal component analysis (PCA) model, which is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original variables into a smaller set of new variables, called principal components, that capture most of the variance and information in the data1. This technique has the following advantages:

It can increase the accuracy of the model by removing noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity from the data, and by enhancing the interpretability and generalization of the model23.

It can decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the number of features and the computational complexity of the model, and by improving the convergence and stability of the model45.

It is suitable for numeric variables, as it relies on the covariance or correlation matrix of the data, and it can handle a large quantity of variables, as it can extract the most relevant ones16.

The other options are not effective or appropriate, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Creating new features and interaction variables can increase the accuracy of the model by capturing more complex and nonlinear relationships in the data, but it can also increase the processing time of the model by adding more features and increasing the computational complexity of the model7. Moreover, it can introduce more noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity in the data, which can degrade the performance and interpretability of the model8.

C: Applying normalization on the feature set can increase the accuracy of the model by scaling the features to a common range and avoiding the dominance of some features over others, but it can also decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the numerical instability and improving the convergence of the model . However, normalization alone is not enough to address the high dimensionality and high latency issues of the dataset, as it does not reduce the number of features or the variance in the data.

D: Using a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) model is not suitable for numeric variables, as it is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original categorical variables into a smaller set of new variables, called factors, that capture most of the inertia and information in the data. MCA is similar to PCA, but it is designed for nominal or ordinal variables, not for continuous or interval variables.

References:

1: Principal Component Analysis - Amazon SageMaker

2: How to Use PCA for Data Visualization and Improved Performance in Machine Learning | by Pratik Shukla | Towards Data Science

3: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Feature Selection and some of its Pitfalls | by Nagesh Singh Chauhan | Towards Data Science

4: How to Reduce Dimensionality with PCA and Train a Support Vector Machine in Python | by James Briggs | Towards Data Science

5: Dimensionality Reduction and Its Applications | by Aniruddha Bhandari | Towards Data Science

6: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in Python | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

7: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning | by Dipanjan (DJ) Sarkar | Towards Data Science

8: Feature Engineering — How to Engineer Features and How to Get Good at It | by Parul Pandey | Towards Data Science

: [Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization | by Benjamin Obi Tayo Ph.D. | Towards Data Science]

: [Why, How and When to Scale your Features | by George Seif | Towards Data Science]

: [Normalization vs Dimensionality Reduction | by Saurabh Annadate | Towards Data Science]

: [Multiple Correspondence Analysis - Amazon SageMaker]

: [Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) | by Raul Eulogio | Towards Data Science]

The most secure action to protect the data from being accessed and transferred to a remote host by malicious code accidentally installed on the training container is to enable network isolation for training jobs. Network isolation is a feature that allows you to run training and inference containers in internet-free mode, which blocks any outbound network calls from the containers, even to other AWS services such as Amazon S3. Additionally, no AWS credentials are made available to the container runtime environment. This way, you can prevent unauthorized access to your data and resources by malicious code or users. You can enable network isolation by setting the EnableNetworkIsolation parameter to True when you call CreateTrainingJob, CreateHyperParameterTuningJob, or CreateModel.

References:

Run Training and Inference Containers in Internet-Free Mode - Amazon SageMaker

Using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries is the solution that requires the least effort to be able to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation and transformation. AWS Glue can automatically discover, crawl, and catalogue the data stored in various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, etc. AWS Glue can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on the Glue Data Catalog and Glue ETL jobs. AWS Glue can handle both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. AWS Glue can also use built-in or custom classifiers to identify and parse the data schema and format1 Amazon Athena is a service that provides an interactive query engine that can run SQL queries directly on data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Athena can integrate with AWS Glue to use the Glue Data Catalog as a central metadata repository for the data sources and tables. Amazon Athena can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on Amazon S3 and the query results. Amazon Athena can query both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. Amazon Athena can also use partitions and compression to optimize the query performance and reduce the query cost23

The other options are not valid or require more effort to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. Using AWS Data Pipeline to transform the data and Amazon RDS to run queries is not a good option, as it involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that can orchestrate and automate data movement and transformation across various AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Data Pipeline can be integrated with Amazon EMR to run ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a managed relational database service that can run various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon RDS can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon RDS can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables45 Using AWS Batch to run ETL on the data and Amazon Aurora to run the queries is not a good option, as it also involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Aurora, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Batch is a service that can run batch computing workloads on AWS. AWS Batch can be integrated with AWS Lambda to trigger ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Aurora is a service that provides a compatible and scalable relational database engine that can run MySQL or PostgreSQL. Amazon Aurora can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon Aurora can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables. Using AWS Lambda to transform the data and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics to run queries is not a good option, as it is not suitable for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL. AWS Lambda is a service that can run serverless functions on AWS. AWS Lambda can be integrated with Amazon S3 to trigger data transformation functions on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data using SQL or Apache Flink. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics can be integrated with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams or Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to ingest streaming data sources, such as web logs, social media, IoT devices, etc. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is not designed for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL.

To build a robust serverless data lake on Amazon S3 that meets the requirements, the financial services company should use the following AWS services:

AWS Glue crawler: This is a service that connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for the data, and then creates metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog1. The company can use an AWS Glue crawler to crawl the S3 data and infer the schema, format, and partition structure of the data. The crawler can also detect schema changes and update the metadata tables accordingly. This enables the company to support querying old and new data on Amazon S3 through Amazon Athena and Amazon Redshift Spectrum, which are serverless interactive query services that use the AWS Glue Data Catalog as a central location for storing and retrieving table metadata23.

AWS Lambda function: This is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. You can also use AWS Lambda to create event-driven ETL pipelines, by triggering other AWS services based on events such as object creation or deletion in S3 buckets4. The company can use an AWS Lambda function to trigger an AWS Glue ETL job, which is a serverless way to extract, transform, and load data for analytics. The AWS Glue ETL job can perform various data processing tasks, such as converting data formats, filtering, aggregating, joining, and more.

AWS Glue Data Catalog: This is a managed service that acts as a central metadata repository for data assets across AWS and on-premises data sources. The AWS Glue Data Catalog provides a uniform repository where disparate systems can store and find metadata to keep track of data in data silos, and use that metadata to query and transform the data. The company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to search and discover metadata, such as table definitions, schemas, and partitions. The AWS Glue Data Catalog also integrates with Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift Spectrum, Amazon EMR, and AWS Glue ETL jobs, providing a consistent view of the data across different query and analysis services.

References:

1: What Is a Crawler? - AWS Glue

2: What Is Amazon Athena? - Amazon Athena

3: Amazon Redshift Spectrum - Amazon Redshift

4: What is AWS Lambda? - AWS Lambda

: AWS Glue ETL Jobs - AWS Glue

: What Is the AWS Glue Data Catalog? - AWS Glue

The best way to ensure that required packages are automatically available on the notebook instance for the data scientist to use is to create an Amazon SageMaker lifecycle configuration with package installation commands and assign the lifecycle configuration to the notebook instance. A lifecycle configuration is a shell script that runs when you create or start a notebook instance. You can use a lifecycle configuration to customize the notebook instance by installing libraries, changing environment variables, or downloading datasets. You can also use a lifecycle configuration to automate the installation of custom Python packages that are not natively available on Amazon SageMaker.

Option A is incorrect because installing AWS Systems Manager Agent on the underlying Amazon EC2 instance and using Systems Manager Automation to execute the package installation commands is not a recommended way to customize the notebook instance. Systems Manager Automation is a feature that lets you safely automate common and repetitive IT operations and tasks across AWS resources. However, using Systems Manager Automation would require additional permissions and configurations, and it would not guarantee that the packages are installed before the notebook instance is ready to use.

Option B is incorrect because creating a Jupyter notebook file (.ipynb) with cells containing the package installation commands to execute and placing the file under the /etc/init directory of each Amazon SageMaker notebook instance is not a valid way to customize the notebook instance. The /etc/init directory is used to store scripts that are executed during the boot process of the operating system, not the Jupyter notebook application. Moreover, a Jupyter notebook file is not a shell script that can be executed by the operating system.

Option C is incorrect because using the conda package manager from within the Jupyter notebook console to apply the necessary conda packages to the default kernel of the notebook is not an automatic way to customize the notebook instance. This option would require the data scientist to manually run the conda commands every time they create or start a new notebook instance. This would not be efficient or convenient for the data scientist.

References:

Customize a notebook instance using a lifecycle configuration script - Amazon SageMaker

AWS Systems Manager Automation - AWS Systems Manager

Conda environments - Amazon SageMaker

The best services to use for building a data ingestion solution for the company’s Amazon S3-based data lake are:

AWS Glue as the data catalog: AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that can discover, crawl, and catalog data from various sources and formats, and make it available for analysis. AWS Glue can also generate ETL code in Python or Scala to transform, enrich, and join data using AWS Glue Data Catalog as the metadata repository. AWS Glue Data Catalog is a central metadata store that integrates with Amazon Athena, Amazon EMR, and Amazon Redshift Spectrum, allowing users to create a unified view of their data across various sources and formats.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for real-time data insights: Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a service that enables users to collect, process, and analyze real-time streaming data at any scale. Users can create data streams that can capture data from various sources, such as web and mobile applications, IoT devices, and social media platforms. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that allows users to analyze streaming data using standard SQL queries or Apache Flink applications. Users can create real-time dashboards, metrics, and alerts based on the streaming data analysis results.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for delivery to Amazon ES for clickstream analytics: Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that enables users to load streaming data into data lakes, data stores, and analytics services. Users can configure Kinesis Data Firehose to automatically deliver data to various destinations, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon OpenSearch Service, and third-party solutions. For clickstream analytics, users can use Kinesis Data Firehose to deliver data to Amazon OpenSearch Service, a fully managed service that offers search and analytics capabilities for log data. Users can use Amazon OpenSearch Service to perform interactive analysis and visualization of clickstream data using Kibana, an open-source tool that is integrated with Amazon OpenSearch Service.

Amazon EMR to generate personalized product recommendations: Amazon EMR is a service that enables users to run distributed data processing frameworks, such as Apache Spark, Apache Hadoop, and Apache Hive, on scalable clusters of EC2 instances. Users can use Amazon EMR to perform advanced analytics, such as machine learning, on large and complex datasets stored in Amazon S3 or other sources. For product recommendations, users can use Amazon EMR to run Spark MLlib, a library that provides scalable machine learning algorithms, such as collaborative filtering, to generate personalized recommendations based on user behavior and preferences.

References:

AWS Glue - Fully Managed ETL Service

Amazon Kinesis - Data Streaming Service

Amazon OpenSearch Service - Managed OpenSearch Service

Amazon EMR - Managed Hadoop Framework

The best solution for this scenario is to use SageMaker Clarify to generate the explanation report and attach it to the predicted results. SageMaker Clarify provides tools to help explain how machine learning (ML) models make predictions using a model-agnostic feature attribution approach based on SHAP values. It can also detect and measure potential bias in the data and the model. SageMaker Clarify can generate explanation reports during data preparation, model training, and model deployment. The reports include metrics, graphs, and examples that help understand the model behavior and predictions. The reports can be attached to the predicted results using the SageMaker SDK or the SageMaker API.

The other solutions are less optimal because they require more development effort and additional services. Using SageMaker Model Debugger would require modifying the training script to save the model output tensors and writing custom rules to debug and explain the predictions. Using AWS Lambda would require writing code to invoke the ML model, compute the feature importance and partial dependence plots, and generate and attach the explanation report. Using custom Amazon CloudWatch metrics would require writing code to publish the metrics, create dashboards, and generate and attach the explanation report.

References:

Bias Detection and Model Explainability - Amazon SageMaker Clarify - AWS

Amazon SageMaker Clarify Model Explainability

Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability

GitHub - aws/amazon-sagemaker-clarify: Fairness Aware Machine Learning

The best storage option for the trucking company is to use an Amazon S3-backed data lake to store the raw images, and set up the permissions using bucket policies. A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale. Amazon S3 is the ideal choice for building a data lake because it offers high durability, scalability, availability, and security. You can store any type of data in Amazon S3, such as images, videos, audio, text, etc. You can also use AWS services such as Amazon Rekognition, Amazon SageMaker, and Amazon EMR to analyze and process the data in the data lake. To ensure the data is only accessible to specific IAM users, you can use bucket policies to grant or deny access to the S3 buckets based on the IAM user’s identity or role. Bucket policies are JSON documents that specify the permissions for the bucket and the objects in it. You can use conditions to restrict access based on various factors, such as IP address, time, source, etc. By using bucket policies, you can control who can access the data in the data lake and what actions they can perform on it.

References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Build a Data Lake Foundation with Amazon S3

AWS Machine Learning Training - Using Bucket Policies and User Policies

To prepare the data for Word2Vec, the Specialist needs to perform some preprocessing steps that can help reduce the noise and complexity of the data, as well as improve the quality of the embeddings. Some of the common preprocessing steps for Word2Vec are:

Normalizing all words by making the sentence lowercase: This can help reduce the vocabulary size and treat words with different capitalizations as the same word. For example, “Fox” and “fox” should be considered as the same word, not two different words.

Removing stop words using an English stopword dictionary: Stop words are words that are very common and do not carry much semantic meaning, such as “the”, “a”, “and”, etc. Removing them can help focus on the words that are more relevant and informative for the task.

Tokenizing the sentence into words: Tokenization is the process of splitting a sentence into smaller units, such as words or subwords. This is necessary for Word2Vec, as it operates on the word level and requires a list of words as input.

The other options are not necessary or appropriate for Word2Vec:

Performing part-of-speech tagging and keeping the action verb and the nouns only: Part-of-speech tagging is the process of assigning a grammatical category to each word, such as noun, verb, adjective, etc. This can be useful for some natural language processing tasks, but not for Word2Vec, as it can lose some important information and context by discarding other words.

Correcting the typography on “quck” to “quick”: Typo correction can be helpful for some tasks, but not for Word2Vec, as it can introduce errors and inconsistencies in the data. For example, if the typo is intentional or part of a dialect, correcting it can change the meaning or style of the sentence. Moreover, Word2Vec can learn to handle typos and variations in spelling by learning similar embeddings for them.

One-hot encoding all words in the sentence: One-hot encoding is a way of representing words as vectors of 0s and 1s, where only one element is 1 and the rest are 0. The index of the 1 element corresponds to the word’s position in the vocabulary. For example, if the vocabulary is [“cat”, “dog”, “fox”], then “cat” can be encoded as [1, 0, 0], “dog” as [0, 1, 0], and “fox” as [0, 0, 1]. This can be useful for some machine learning models, but not for Word2Vec, as it does not capture the semantic similarity and relationship between words. Word2Vec aims to learn dense and low-dimensional embeddings for words, where similar words have similar vectors.

To control data egress from SageMaker, the ML engineer can use the following mechanisms:

Connect to SageMaker by using a VPC interface endpoint powered by AWS PrivateLink. This allows the ML engineer to access SageMaker services and resources without exposing the traffic to the public internet. This reduces the risk of data leakage and unauthorized access1

Enable network isolation for training jobs and models. This prevents the training jobs and models from accessing the internet or other AWS services. This ensures that the data used for training and inference is not exposed to external sources2

Protect data with encryption at rest and in transit. Use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to manage encryption keys. This enables the ML engineer to encrypt the data stored in Amazon S3 buckets, SageMaker notebook instances, and SageMaker endpoints. It also allows the ML engineer to encrypt the data in transit between SageMaker and other AWS services. This helps protect the data from unauthorized access and tampering3

The other options are not effective in controlling data egress from SageMaker:

Use SCPs to restrict access to SageMaker. SCPs are used to define the maximum permissions for an organization or organizational unit (OU) in AWS Organizations. They do not control the data egress from SageMaker, but rather the access to SageMaker itself4

Disable root access on the SageMaker notebook instances. This prevents the users from installing additional packages or libraries on the notebook instances. It does not prevent the data from being transferred out of the notebook instances.

Restrict notebook presigned URLs to specific IPs used by the company. This limits the access to the notebook instances from certain IP addresses. It does not prevent the data from being transferred out of the notebook instances.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Interface VPC Endpoints (AWS PrivateLink) - Amazon SageMaker

2: Network Isolation - Amazon SageMaker

3: Encrypt Data at Rest and in Transit - Amazon SageMaker

4: Using Service Control Policies - AWS Organizations

: Disable Root Access - Amazon SageMaker

: Create a Presigned Notebook Instance URL - Amazon SageMaker

The solution A will create the required transformed records with the least operational overhead because it uses AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, which are fully managed services that can provide the desired functionality. The solution A involves the following steps:

Create an AWS Lambda function that can transform the incoming records. AWS Lambda is a service that can run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda can execute the transformation logic on the purchasing records and add the new attributes to the records1.

Enable data transformation on the ingestion Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream. Use the Lambda function as the invocation target. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can capture, transform, and load streaming data into AWS data stores. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can enable data transformation and invoke the Lambda function to process the incoming records before delivering them to Amazon S3. This can reduce the operational overhead of managing the transformation process and the data storage2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Deploying an Amazon EMR cluster that runs Apache Spark and includes the transformation logic, using Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) to schedule an AWS Lambda function to launch the cluster each day and transform the records that accumulate in Amazon S3, and delivering the transformed records to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the Amazon EMR cluster, the Apache Spark application, the AWS Lambda function, and the Amazon EventBridge rule. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day3.

Option C: Deploying an Amazon S3 File Gateway in the stores, updating the in-store software to deliver data to the S3 File Gateway, and using a scheduled daily AWS Glue job to transform the data that the S3 File Gateway delivers to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the S3 File Gateway, the in-store software, and the AWS Glue job. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day4.

Option D: Launching a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances that include the transformation logic, configuring the EC2 instances with a daily cron job to transform the records that accumulate in Amazon S3, and delivering the transformed records to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the EC2 instances, the transformation code, and the cron job. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day5.

References:

1: AWS Lambda

2: Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: Amazon EMR

4: Amazon S3 File Gateway

5: Amazon EC2

In predictive maintenance, when a dataset is imbalanced (with far fewer failure cases than non-failure cases), oversampling the minority class helps the model learn from the minority class effectively. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) generates synthetic samples for the minority class by creating data points between existing minority class instances. This can enhance the model’s ability to recognize failure patterns, particularly in imbalanced datasets.

SMOTE increases the effective presence of failure cases in the dataset, providing a balanced learning environment for the model. This is more effective than undersampling, which would risk losing important non-failure data.

 The best approach to maximize transcription accuracy during the development phase is to create a custom vocabulary file containing each product name with phonetic pronunciations, and use it with Amazon Transcribe to perform the ASR customization. A custom vocabulary is a list of words and phrases that are likely to appear in your audio input, along with optional information about how to pronounce them. By using a custom vocabulary, you can improve the transcription accuracy of domain-specific terms, such as product names, that may not be recognized by the general vocabulary of Amazon Transcribe. You can also analyze the transcripts and manually update the custom vocabulary file to include updated or additional entries for those names that are not being correctly identified.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not suitable because Amazon Lex is a service for building conversational interfaces, not for transcribing voicemail messages. Amazon Lex also has a limit of 100 slots per bot, which is not enough to accommodate the 200 unique product names required by the company.

Option B is not optimal because it relies on the word confidence scores in the transcript, which may not be accurate enough to identify all the mis-transcribed product names. Moreover, automatically creating or updating a custom vocabulary file may introduce errors or inconsistencies in the pronunciation or display of the words.

Option D is not feasible because it requires a large amount of training data to build a custom language model. The company only has 4,000 words of Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth voicemail transcripts, which is not enough to train a robust and reliable custom language model. Additionally, creating and updating a custom language model is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process, which may not be suitable for the development phase where frequent changes are expected.

References:

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Vocabulary

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Language Models

[Amazon Lex – Limits]

The problem of detecting whether or not individuals in a collection of images are wearing the company’s retail brand is an example of image recognition, which is a type of machine learning task that identifies and classifies objects in an image. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a type of machine learning algorithm that are well-suited for image recognition, as they can learn to extract features from images and handle variations in size, shape, color, and orientation of the objects. CNNs consist of multiple layers that perform convolution, pooling, and activation operations on the input images, resulting in a high-level representation that can be used for classification or detection. Therefore, option D is the best choice for the machine learning algorithm that meets the requirements of the chief editor.

Option A is incorrect because latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) is a type of machine learning algorithm that is used for topic modeling, which is a task that discovers the hidden themes or topics in a collection of text documents. LDA is not suitable for image recognition, as it does not preserve the spatial information of the pixels. Option B is incorrect because recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a type of machine learning algorithm that are used for sequential data, such as text, speech, or time series. RNNs can learn from the temporal dependencies and patterns in the input data, and generate outputs that depend on the previous states. RNNs are not suitable for image recognition, as they do not capture the spatial dependencies and patterns in the input images. Option C is incorrect because k-means is a type of machine learning algorithm that is used for clustering, which is a task that groups similar data points together based on their features. K-means is not suitable for image recognition, as it does not perform classification or detection of the objects in the images.

References:

Image Recognition Software - ML Image & Video Analysis - Amazon …

Image classification and object detection using Amazon Rekognition …

AWS Amazon Rekognition - Deep Learning Face and Image Recognition …

GitHub - awslabs/aws-ai-solution-kit: Machine Learning APIs for common …

Meet iNaturalist, an AWS-powered nature app that helps you identify …

The SageMaker Spark library is a library that enables Apache Spark applications to integrate with Amazon SageMaker for training and hosting machine learning models. The library provides several features, such as:

Estimators: Classes that allow Spark users to train Amazon SageMaker models and host them on Amazon SageMaker endpoints using the Spark MLlib Pipelines API. The library supports various built-in algorithms, such as linear learner, XGBoost, K-means, etc., as well as custom algorithms using Docker containers.

Model classes: Classes that wrap Amazon SageMaker models in a Spark MLlib Model abstraction. This allows Spark users to use Amazon SageMaker endpoints for inference within Spark applications.

Data sources: Classes that allow Spark users to read data from Amazon S3 using the Spark Data Sources API. The library supports various data formats, such as CSV, LibSVM, RecordIO, etc.

To integrate the Spark application with SageMaker, the Machine Learning Specialist should do the following:

Install the SageMaker Spark library in the Spark environment. This can be done by using Maven, pip, or downloading the JAR file from GitHub.

Use the appropriate estimator from the SageMaker Spark Library to train a model. For example, to train a linear learner model, the Specialist can use the following code:

Use the sageMakerModel. transform method to get inferences from the model hosted in SageMaker. For example, to get predictions for a test DataFrame, the Specialist can use the following code:

References:

[SageMaker Spark]: A documentation page that introduces the SageMaker Spark library and its features.

[SageMaker Spark GitHub Repository]: A GitHub repository that contains the source code, examples, and installation instructions for the SageMaker Spark library.

 The best combination of AWS services to meet the requirements of data discovery, enrichment, transformation, querying, analysis, and reporting with the least coding and infrastructure management is AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and Amazon QuickSight. These services are:

AWS Glue for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that automatically crawls, catalogs, and prepares data from various sources and formats. It also provides a visual interface called AWS Glue DataBrew that allows users to apply over 250 transformations to clean, normalize, and enrich data without writing code1

Amazon Athena for querying and analyzing the results in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows users to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. It supports a variety of data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Parquet, and Avro. It also integrates with AWS Glue Data Catalog to provide a unified view of the data sources and schemas2

Amazon QuickSight for reporting and getting insights. Amazon QuickSight is a serverless business intelligence service that allows users to create and share interactive dashboards and reports. It also provides ML-powered features, such as anomaly detection, forecasting, and natural language queries, to help users discover hidden insights from their data3

The other options are not suitable because they either require more coding effort, more infrastructure management, or do not support the desired use cases. For example:

Option A uses Amazon EMR for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. Amazon EMR is a managed cluster platform that runs Apache Spark, Apache Hive, and other open-source frameworks for big data processing. It requires users to write code in languages such as Python, Scala, or SQL to perform data integration tasks. It also requires users to provision, configure, and scale the clusters according to their needs4

Option B uses Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for data ingestion. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that allows users to process streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink. It is not suitable for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation, which are typically batch-oriented tasks. It also requires users to write code to define the data processing logic and the output destination5

Option D uses AWS Data Pipeline for data transfer and AWS Step Functions for orchestrating AWS Lambda jobs for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that helps users move data between AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Step Functions is a service that helps users coordinate multiple AWS services into workflows. AWS Lambda is a service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. These services require users to write code to define the data sources, destinations, transformations, and workflows. They also require users to manage the scalability, performance, and reliability of the data pipelines.

References:

1: AWS Glue - Data Integration Service - Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Query Service - AWS

3: Amazon QuickSight - Business Intelligence Service - AWS

4: Amazon EMR - Amazon Web Services

5: Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Data Pipeline - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Step Functions - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Lambda - Amazon Web Services

To capture word context and sequential QA information, the embedding vectors need to consider both the order and the meaning of the words in the text.

Option B, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Skip-gram mode, is a valid option because it can learn word embeddings that capture the semantic similarity and syntactic relations between words based on their co-occurrence in a window of words. Skip-gram mode can also handle rare words better than continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode1.

Option E, combination of the Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Batch Skip-gram mode with a custom recurrent neural network (RNN), is another valid option because it can leverage the advantages of Skip-gram mode and also use an RNN to model the sequential nature of the text. An RNN can capture the temporal dependencies and long-term dependencies between words, which are important for QA tasks2.

Option A, Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for sequence-to-sequence tasks such as machine translation, summarization, or chatbots. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather generates an output sequence given an input sequence3.

Option C, Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for learning embeddings for pairs of objects, such as text-image, text-text, or image-image. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather learns a similarity function between pairs of objects4.

Option D, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode, is not a valid option because it does not capture word context as well as Skip-gram mode. CBOW mode predicts a word given its surrounding words, while Skip-gram mode predicts the surrounding words given a word. CBOW mode is faster and more suitable for frequent words, but Skip-gram mode can learn more meaningful embeddings for rare words1.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText

2: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)

3: Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq

4: Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec

One-hot encoding is a technique that can be used to convert a categorical variable, such as the Day-Of_Week column, to binary values. One-hot encoding creates a new binary column for each unique value in the original column, and assigns a value of 1 to the column that corresponds to the value in the original column, and 0 to the rest. For example, if the original column has values Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, one-hot encoding will create seven new columns, each representing one day of the week. If the value in the original column is Tuesday, then the column for Tuesday will have a value of 1, and the other columns will have a value of 0. One-hot encoding can help improve the performance of machine learning models, as it eliminates the ordinal relationship between the values and creates a more informative and sparse representation of the data.

References:

One-Hot Encoding - Amazon SageMaker

One-Hot Encoding: A Simple Guide for Beginners | by Jana Schmidt …

One-Hot Encoding in Machine Learning | by Nishant Malik | Towards …

The best indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable for this scenario are D and E, because they imply that the historical sensor data is sufficient and relevant for building a predictive maintenance model. This model can use machine learning techniques such as regression, classification, or anomaly detection to learn from the past data and forecast future failures or issues12. Having high granularity and diversity of data can improve the accuracy and generalization of the model, as well as enable the detection of complex patterns and relationships that are not captured by simple rule-based thresholds3.

The other options are not good indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable, because they suggest that the historical sensor data is incomplete, inconsistent, or inadequate for building a predictive maintenance model. These options would require additional data collection, preprocessing, or augmentation to overcome the data quality issues and ensure that the model can handle different scenarios and types of cranes4 .

References:

1: Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance

2: A Guide to Predictive Maintenance & Machine Learning

3: Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: Reinventing Asset Upkeep

4: Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning: A Complete Guide

: [Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance - AWS Online Tech Talks]

A neural network pre-trained on ImageNet is a deep learning model that has been trained on a large dataset of images containing 1000 classes of objects. The model can learn to extract high-level features from the images that capture the semantic and visual information of the objects. The penultimate layer of the model is the layer before the final output layer, and it contains a feature vector that represents the input image in a lower-dimensional space. By running images through a pre-trained neural network and collecting the feature vectors from the penultimate layer, the Specialist can obtain relevant numerical representations that can be used for nearest-neighbor searches. The feature vectors can capture the similarity between images based on the presence and appearance of similar objects, and they can be compared using distance metrics such as Euclidean distance or cosine similarity. This approach can enable the recommendation engine to show a picture that captures similar objects to a given picture.

References:

ImageNet - Wikipedia

How to use a pre-trained neural network to extract features from images | by Rishabh Anand | Analytics Vidhya | Medium

Image Similarity using Deep Ranking | by Aditya Oke | Towards Data Science

 To find the most discussed topics in the comments that are in either English or Spanish, the machine learning specialist needs to perform two steps: first, translate the comments from Spanish to English if necessary, and second, apply a topic modeling algorithm to the comments. The following options are valid ways to accomplish these steps using AWS services:

Option C: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon Comprehend topic modeling to find the topics. Amazon Translate is a neural machine translation service that delivers fast, high-quality, and affordable language translation. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to find insights and relationships in text. Amazon Comprehend topic modeling is a feature that automatically organizes a collection of text documents into topics that contain commonly used words and phrases.

Option E: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) to find the topics. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly. Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) is an unsupervised learning algorithm that is used to organize a corpus of documents into topics that contain word groupings based on their statistical distribution.

The other options are not valid because:

Option A: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a text classification and word embedding algorithm. It cannot find the topics independently from language, as different languages have different word distributions and semantics.

Option B: Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm is not a translation algorithm, but a sequence-to-sequence learning algorithm that can be used for tasks such as summarization, chatbot, and question answering. Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm is a topic modeling algorithm, but it requires the input documents to be in the same language and preprocessed into a bag-of-words format.

Option D: Amazon Lex is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. It cannot extract topics from the content, but only intents and slots based on a predefined bot configuration. References:

Amazon Translate

Amazon Comprehend

Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Amazon SageMaker BlazingText

Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq

Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Algorithm

Amazon Lex

The best solution to meet the requirements of the company is to use AWS DataSync to make an initial copy of the entire dataset, and schedule subsequent incremental transfers of changing data until the final cutover from on premises to AWS. This is because:

AWS DataSync is an online data movement and discovery service that simplifies data migration and helps you quickly, easily, and securely transfer your file or object data to, from, and between AWS storage services 1. AWS DataSync can copy data between on-premises object storage and Amazon S3, and also supports encryption, scheduling, monitoring, and data integrity validation 1.

AWS DataSync can make an initial copy of the entire dataset by using a DataSync agent, which is a software appliance that connects to your on-premises storage and manages the data transfer to AWS 2. The DataSync agent can be deployed as a virtual machine (VM) on your existing hypervisor, or as an Amazon EC2 instance in your AWS account 2.

AWS DataSync can schedule subsequent incremental transfers of changing data by using a task, which is a configuration that specifies the source and destination locations, the options for the transfer, and the schedule for the transfer 3. You can create a task to run once or on a recurring schedule, and you can also use filters to include or exclude specific files or objects based on their names or prefixes 3.

AWS DataSync can perform the final cutover from on premises to AWS by using a sync task, which is a type of task that synchronizes the data in the source and destination locations 4. A sync task transfers only the data that has changed or that doesn’t exist in the destination, and also deletes any files or objects from the destination that were deleted from the source since the last sync 4.

Therefore, by using AWS DataSync, the company can create a data repository in the AWS Cloud for machine learning projects, and use Amazon S3 for the data storage, while meeting the requirements of encryption, scheduling, monitoring, and data integrity validation.

References:

Data Transfer Service - AWS DataSync

Deploying a DataSync Agent

Creating a Task

Syncing Data with AWS DataSync

The best way to visualize the model’s degradation is to create a histogram of the model errors over the last 3 weeks and compare it with a histogram of the model errors from before that period. A histogram is a graphical representation of the distribution of numerical data. It shows how often each value or range of values occurs in the data. A model error is the difference between the actual value and the predicted value. A high model error indicates a poor fit of the model to the data. By comparing the histograms of the model errors, the ML team can see if there is a significant change in the shape, spread, or center of the distribution. This can indicate if the model is underfitting, overfitting, or drifting from the data. A line chart or a scatter plot would not be as effective as a histogram for this purpose, because they do not show the distribution of the errors. A line chart would only show the trend of the errors over time, which may not capture the variability or outliers. A scatter plot would only show the relationship between the errors and another variable, such as daily sales, which may not be relevant or informative for the model’s performance. References:

Histogram - Wikipedia

Model error - Wikipedia

SageMaker Model Monitor - visualizing monitoring results

To count the number of students who are in a class, the solution needs to detect and locate each student in the video frame. Object detection is a computer vision model that can identify and locate multiple objects in an image. To differentiate students who are performing a stretch correctly from students who are performing a stretch incorrectly, the solution needs to measure the location and angle of each student’s arms and legs. Pose estimation is a computer vision model that can estimate the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts. Image classification, OCR, and image GANs are not relevant for this use case. References:

Object Detection: A computer vision technique that identifies and locates objects within an image or video.

Pose Estimation: A computer vision technique that estimates the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts.

Amazon SageMaker: A fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly.

The company wants to predict the demand for a new product that will soon be launched, based on the sales history of similar products. This is a time series forecasting problem, which requires a machine learning algorithm that can learn from historical data and generate future predictions.

One of the most suitable solutions for this problem is to use the Amazon SageMaker DeepAR algorithm, which is a supervised learning algorithm for forecasting scalar time series using recurrent neural networks (RNN). DeepAR can handle multiple related time series, such as the sales of different products, and learn a global model that captures the common patterns and trends across the time series. DeepAR can also generate probabilistic forecasts that provide confidence intervals and quantify the uncertainty of the predictions.

DeepAR can outperform traditional forecasting methods, such as ARIMA, especially when the dataset contains hundreds or thousands of related time series. DeepAR can also use the trained model to forecast the demand for new products that are similar to the ones it has been trained on, by using the categorical features that encode the product attributes. For example, the company can use the product type, brand, flavor, size, and price as categorical features to group the products and learn the typical behavior for each group.

Therefore, the Machine Learning Specialist should apply the Amazon SageMaker DeepAR algorithm to forecast the demand for the new product, by using the sales history of the existing products as the training dataset, and the product attributes as the categorical features.

References:

DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Now available in Amazon SageMaker: DeepAR algorithm for more accurate time series forecasting

The solution C meets the requirements because it minimizes costs for compute infrastructure, maximizes the scalability of resources for training, and facilitates the use of an ML model in low-connectivity environments. The solution C involves the following steps:

Move the training data to an Amazon S3 bucket. This will enable the company to store the large amount of data in a durable, scalable, and cost-effective way. It will also allow the company to access the data from the cloud for training and evaluation purposes1.

Train and evaluate the model by using Amazon SageMaker. This will enable the company to use a fully managed service that provides various features and tools for building, training, tuning, and deploying ML models. Amazon SageMaker can handle large-scale data processing and distributed training, and it can leverage the power of AWS compute resources such as Amazon EC2, Amazon EKS, and AWS Fargate2.

Optimize the model by using SageMaker Neo. This will enable the company to reduce the size of the model and improve its performance and efficiency. SageMaker Neo can compile the model into an executable that can run on various hardware platforms, such as CPUs, GPUs, and edge devices3.

Set up an edge device in the manufacturing facilities with AWS IoT Greengrass. This will enable the company to deploy the model on a local device that can run inference in real time, even in low-connectivity environments. AWS IoT Greengrass can extend AWS cloud capabilities to the edge, and it can securely communicate with the cloud for updates and synchronization4.

Deploy the model on the edge device. This will enable the company to automate quality control in its facilities by using the model to detect defects in new parts as they move on a conveyor belt. The model can run inference locally on the edge device without requiring internet connectivity, and it can send the results to the cloud when the connection is available4.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Deploying the model on a SageMaker hosting services endpoint will not facilitate the use of the model in low-connectivity environments, as it will require internet access to perform inference. Moreover, it may incur higher costs for hosting and data transfer than deploying the model on an edge device.

Option B: Training and evaluating the model on premises will not minimize costs for compute infrastructure, as it will require the company to maintain and upgrade its own hardware and software. Moreover, it will not maximize the scalability of resources for training, as it will limit the company’s ability to leverage the cloud’s elasticity and flexibility.

Option D: Training the model on premises will not minimize costs for compute infrastructure, nor maximize the scalability of resources for training, for the same reasons as option B.

References:

1: Amazon S3

2: Amazon SageMaker

3: SageMaker Neo

4: AWS IoT Greengrass

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is a tool that helps data scientists and ML developers to prepare data for ML. One of the features of Data Wrangler is the anomaly detection visualization, which uses an unsupervised ML algorithm to identify outliers in the dataset based on statistical properties. The ML specialist can use this feature to quickly explore the sensor data and find any anomalous values that may affect the model performance. The ML specialist can then add a transformation to a Data Wrangler data flow to remove the outliers from the dataset. The data flow can be exported as a script or a pipeline to automate the data preparation process. This option requires the least operational overhead compared to the other options.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Anomaly Detection Visualization - Amazon SageMaker

Transform Data - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker managed spot training allows for cost-effective training by utilizing Spot Instances, which are lower-cost EC2 instances that can be interrupted when demand is high. By enabling checkpointing in SageMaker, the company can save intermediate model states to Amazon S3, allowing training to resume from the last checkpoint if interrupted. This solution minimizes operational overhead by automating the checkpointing process and resuming work after interruptions, reducing the need for retraining from scratch.

This setup provides a reliable and cost-efficient approach to training large models with minimal operational overhead and risk of data loss.

Stratified sampling is a technique that preserves the class distribution of the original dataset when creating a smaller or split dataset. This means that the proportion of examples from each class in the original dataset is maintained in the smaller or split dataset. Stratified sampling can help improve the validation accuracy of the model by ensuring that the validation dataset is representative of the original dataset and not biased towards any class. This can reduce the variance and overfitting of the model and increase its generalization ability. Stratified sampling can be applied to both oversampling and undersampling methods, depending on whether the goal is to increase or decrease the size of the dataset.

The other options are not effective ways to improve the validation accuracy of the model. Acquiring additional data about the majority classes in the original dataset will only increase the imbalance and make the model more biased towards the majority classes. Using a smaller, randomly sampled version of the training dataset will not guarantee that the class distribution is preserved and may result in losing important information from the minority classes. Performing systematic sampling on the original dataset will also not ensure that the class distribution is preserved and may introduce sampling bias if the original dataset is ordered or grouped by class.

References:

•Stratified Sampling for Imbalanced Datasets

•Imbalanced Data

•Tour of Data Sampling Methods for Imbalanced Classification

To leverage the NVIDIA GPUs on Amazon EC2 P3 instances, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to build the Docker container to be NVIDIA-Docker compatible. NVIDIA-Docker is a tool that enables GPU-accelerated containers to run on Docker. It automatically configures the container to access the NVIDIA drivers and libraries on the host system. The Specialist does not need to bundle the NVIDIA drivers with the Docker image, as they are already installed on the EC2 P3 instances. The Specialist does not need to organize the Docker container’s file structure to execute on GPU instances, as this is not relevant for GPU compatibility. The Specialist does not need to set the GPU flag in the Amazon SageMaker Create TrainingJob request body, as this is only required for using Elastic Inference accelerators, not EC2 P3 instances. References: NVIDIA-Docker, Using GPU-Accelerated Containers, Using Elastic Inference in Amazon SageMaker

To create a serverless ingestion and analytics solution for high-velocity, real-time streaming data, the Data Scientist should use the following AWS services:

AWS Glue Data Catalog: This is a managed service that acts as a central metadata repository for data assets across AWS and on-premises data sources. The Data Scientist can use AWS Glue Data Catalog to create a schema of the incoming data format, which defines the structure, format, and data types of the JSON records. The schema can be used by other AWS services to understand and process the data1.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: This is a fully managed service that delivers real-time streaming data to destinations such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, and Splunk. The Data Scientist can use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to stream the data from the source and transform the data to a query-optimized, columnar format such as Apache Parquet or ORC using the AWS Glue Data Catalog before delivering to Amazon S3. This enables efficient compression, partitioning, and fast analytics on the data2.

Amazon S3: This is an object storage service that offers high durability, availability, and scalability. The Data Scientist can use Amazon S3 as the output datastore for the transformed data, which can be organized into buckets and prefixes according to the desired partitioning scheme. Amazon S3 also integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon Athena, Amazon EMR, and Amazon Redshift Spectrum for analytics3.

Amazon Athena: This is a serverless interactive query service that allows users to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. The Data Scientist can use Amazon Athena to run SQL queries against the data in Amazon S3 and connect to existing business intelligence dashboards using the Athena Java Database Connectivity (JDBC) connector. Amazon Athena leverages the AWS Glue Data Catalog to access the schema information and supports formats such as Parquet and ORC for fast and cost-effective queries4.

References:

1: What Is the AWS Glue Data Catalog? - AWS Glue

2: What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose? - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: What Is Amazon S3? - Amazon Simple Storage Service

4: What Is Amazon Athena? - Amazon Athena

 The best option is to deploy the Lambda function and the ML models onto the AWS IoT Greengrass core that is running on the industrial PCs that are installed on each machine. This way, the inference can be performed locally on the edge devices, without the need to upload the images to Amazon S3 and invoke the SageMaker endpoint. This will reduce the latency and the network bandwidth consumption. The long-running Lambda function can be extended to invoke the Lambda function with the captured images and run the inference on the edge component that forwards the results directly to the web service. This will also simplify the architecture and eliminate the dependency on the internet connection.

Option A is not cost-effective, as it requires setting up a 10 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connection and increasing the size and number of instances for the SageMaker endpoint. This will increase the operational costs and complexity.

Option B is not optimal, as it still requires uploading the images to Amazon S3 and invoking the SageMaker endpoint. Compressing and decompressing the images will add additional processing overhead and latency.

Option C is not sufficient, as it still requires uploading the images to Amazon S3 and invoking the SageMaker endpoint. Auto scaling for SageMaker will help to handle the increased workload, but it will not reduce the latency or the network bandwidth consumption. Setting up an AWS Direct Connect connection will improve the network performance, but it will also increase the operational costs and complexity. References:

AWS IoT Greengrass

Deploying Machine Learning Models to Edge Devices

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Exam Guide

 Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that can analyze text and extract insights such as sentiment, entities, topics, and language. Amazon Comprehend also provides custom classification and custom entity recognition features that allow users to train their own models using their own data and labels. For the scenario of routing customer claims to different queues based on categories, Amazon Comprehend custom classification is a suitable solution. The custom classifier can be trained using a .csv file that contains the claim text and the claim label as columns. The custom classifier can then be used to process incoming claims and predict the labels using the Amazon Comprehend API. The predicted labels can be used to route the claims to the appropriate queue. This solution does not require any machine learning expertise or model deployment, and it can be easily integrated with the existing application.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec is an algorithm that can learn embeddings of objects such as words, sentences, or documents. It can be used for tasks such as text classification, sentiment analysis, or recommendation systems. However, using this algorithm requires machine learning expertise and model deployment using SageMaker, which are not available for the company.

Option B: Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is an algorithm that can discover the topics or themes in a collection of documents. It can be used for tasks such as topic modeling, document clustering, or text summarization. However, using this algorithm requires machine learning expertise and model deployment using SageMaker, which are not available for the company. Moreover, LDA does not provide labels for the topics, but rather a distribution of words for each topic, which may not match the existing categories of the claims.

Option C: Amazon Textract is a service that can extract text and data from scanned documents or images. It can be used for tasks such as document analysis, data extraction, or form processing. However, using this service is unnecessary and inefficient for the scenario, since the company already has the claim text and label in a database. Moreover, Amazon Textract does not provide custom classification features, so it cannot be used to train a custom classifier using the existing data and labels.

References:

Amazon Comprehend Custom Classification

Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec

Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation

Amazon Textract

The best approach to identify and visualize the natural groupings for the numerical columns across all customers is to embed the numerical features using the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) algorithm and create a scatter plot. t-SNE is a dimensionality reduction technique that can project high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space, while preserving the local structure and distances of the data points. A scatter plot can then show the clusters of data points in the reduced space, where each point represents a customer and the color indicates the cluster membership. This approach can help the Specialist quickly explore the patterns and similarities among the customers based on their numerical features.

The other options are not as effective or efficient as the t-SNE approach. Running k-means for different values of k and creating an elbow plot can help determine the optimal number of clusters, but it does not provide a visual representation of the clusters or the customers. Embedding the numerical features using t-SNE and creating a line graph does not make sense, as a line graph is used to show the change of a variable over time, not the distribution of data points in a space. Running k-means for different values of k and creating box plots for each numerical column within each cluster can provide some insights into the statistics of each cluster, but it is very time-consuming and cumbersome to create and compare thousands of box plots. References:

Dimensionality Reduction - Amazon SageMaker

Visualize high dimensional data using t-SNE - Amazon SageMaker

The correct solution for changing the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances is to increase the cooldown period for the scale-out activity. The cooldown period is the amount of time, in seconds, after a scaling activity completes before another scaling activity can start. By increasing the cooldown period for the scale-out activity, the ML team can ensure that the new instances are ready before launching additional instances. This will prevent over-scaling and reduce costs1

The other options are incorrect because they either do not solve the issue or require unnecessary steps. For example:

Option A decreases the cooldown period for the scale-in activity and increases the configured maximum capacity of instances. This option does not address the issue of launching additional instances before the new instances are ready. It may also cause under-scaling and performance degradation.

Option B replaces the current endpoint with a multi-model endpoint using SageMaker. A multi-model endpoint is an endpoint that can host multiple models using a single endpoint. It does not affect the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances. It also requires creating a new endpoint and updating the application code to use it2

Option C sets up Amazon API Gateway and AWS Lambda to trigger the SageMaker inference endpoint. Amazon API Gateway is a service that allows users to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs. AWS Lambda is a service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. These services do not affect the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances. They also require creating and configuring additional resources and services34

References:

1: Automatic Scaling - Amazon SageMaker

2: Create a Multi-Model Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

3: Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Web Services

4: AWS Lambda - Amazon Web Services

The company needs to transcribe petabytes of audio files from an on-premises VoIP system to an S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. The transcription algorithm requires GPUs for inference, which are not available on the on-premises system. The VPN connection over a 100 Mbps connection is not sufficient to transfer the large amount of data quickly. Therefore, the company should use an AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized device with an NVIDIA Tesla module to run the transcription algorithm locally and leverage the GPU power. The device can store up to 42 TB of data and can be shipped back to AWS for data ingestion. The company can use AWS DataSync to send the resulting transcriptions to the transcription S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. This solution minimizes the network bandwidth and latency issues and enables faster data processing and transfer.

Option B is incorrect because AWS Snowcone is a small, portable, rugged, and secure edge computing and data transfer device that can store up to 8 TB of data. It is not suitable for processing petabytes of data and does not support GPU-based instances.

Option C is incorrect because AWS Outposts is a service that extends AWS infrastructure, services, APIs, and tools to virtually any data center, co-location space, or on-premises facility. It is not designed for data transfer and ingestion, and it would require additional infrastructure and maintenance costs.

Option D is incorrect because AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data to and from AWS over the internet or AWS Direct Connect. However, using DataSync to ingest the audio files to S3 would still be limited by the network bandwidth and latency. Moreover, running the transcription algorithm on AWS Lambda would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the GPU power that the algorithm requires.

References:

AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized

AWS DataSync

AWS Snowcone

AWS Outposts

AWS Lambda