CIPS L4M2 Dumps

Explanation

The difference between the actual spend and budgeted spend is known as variance. The formula for variance is:

Variance = Actual spend - Budgeted spend

Variances can be adverse/unfavourable or favourable ie they can be positive or negative.

Be very careful with these terms. A positive or a negative variance may be favourable or it may be adverse/ unfavourable.

Adverse variances

Adverse variances are those variances that are unfavourable to the firm. Examples would be sales below plan; costs above budget, cash receipts lower than expected, and overtime payment more than forecast.

Favourable variances

Favourable variances are those variances that are beneficial to the business. Examples would be sales ahead of plan, costs below budget, and wages below forecast.

Positive variance

A positive variance occurs where 'actual' exceeds 'planned' or 'budgeted' value. Examples might be actual sales are ahead of the budget.

Negative variance

A negative variance occurs where 'actual' is less than 'planned' or 'budgeted' value. Examples would be when the raw materials cost less than expected, sales were less than predicted, and labour costs were below the budgeted figure.

When the operators create saving, it means that the Actual spend is less than Budgeted spend. Therefore the variance is negative.

Explanation

The purpose of this QUESTION NO: is to test the student's ability to identify the problems and translate those problems to actionable requirements before communicating with the suppliers. The scenario suggests that Synergy Ltd's customer services team is using Excel spreadsheets, they lack a centralised customer database. This leads to problems in communications with customers.

A CRM system can solve the communication problem. But a QUESTION NO: arises: If a CRM system is employed, how will the previous data be imported? If the CRM system can support bulk import from Excel tables, it will save a lot of time.

Explanation

IT equipment is typically linked with through-life contracts. This type of contract not only deal with the specification and the price of a machinery, but also other stages such as design, manufacture, installation, in-service support, decommission and disposal. Among these stages, the design stage is when buyer's requirements are translated into technically correct specification.

Explanation

There are four common types of budgets that companies use: (1) incremental, (2) activity-based, (3) value proposition, and (4) zero-based.

Incremental budgeting takes last year’s actual figures and adds or subtracts a percentage to obtain the current year’s budget. It is the most common method of budgeting because it is simple and easy to understand.

Activity-based budgeting is a top-down budgeting approach that determines the amount of inputs required to support the targets or outputs set by the company. For example, a company sets an out-put target of $100 million in revenues. The company will need to first determine the activities that need to be undertaken to meet the sales target, and then find out the costs of carrying out these ac-tivities.

In value proposition budgeting, the budgeter considers the following questions:

- Why is this amount included in the budget?

- Does the item create value for customers, staff, or other stakeholders?

- Does the value of the item outweigh its cost? If not, then is there another reason why the cost is justified?

Value proposition budgeting is really a mindset about making sure that everything that is included in the budget delivers value for the business. Value proposition budgeting aims to avoid unneces-sary expenditures – although it is not as precisely aimed at that goal as our final budgeting option, zero-based budgeting.

As one of the most commonly used budgeting methods, zero-based budgeting starts with the as-sumption that all department budgets are zero and must be rebuilt from scratch. Managers must be able to justify every single expense. No expenditures are automatically “okayed”. Zero-based budgeting is very tight, aiming to avoid any and all expenditures that are not considered absolutely essential to the company’s successful (profitable) operation. This kind of bottom-up budgeting can be a highly effective way to “shake things up”. This is the method used in the scenario.

Explanation

The following are typical social criteria in procurement:

• Reducing unemployment

• Preventing the use of child labour

• Preventing discrimination on the grounds of race, religion, disability, sex or sexual orientation

• Encouraging good employment practice

• Reducing local unemployment

• Reducing social exclusion

• Promoting training opportunities for the young or disadvantaged

• Encouraging access to work for people with disabilities

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Developing Specifications)

A performance specification sets out what the system must do or achieve rather than how it should be built.

According to CIPS L4M2, performance specifications:

Encourage supplier innovation because they give flexibility in how to meet the outcomes.

Are suitable where the supplier has more technical expertise.

Allow technological improvements to be incorporated.

In this case, a complex IT system benefits from supplier innovation, so using a performance specification is correct.

Option A aligns directly with L4M2 principles.

Relevant L4M2 references:

Section: “Types and purpose of specifications”

Subsection: “Encouraging innovation through performance specifications”

Explanation

Open-ended problem is something stopping the achievement of an objective or blocking progress. To solve this type of problems, procurement professional should find a way to unblock the block-age. In the above question, high logistics cost is an obstacle to cost cutting objective while suppli-er’s incompliance prevents the company to achieve its sustainable objective.

Explanation

In sales and marketing, market segmentation is the process of trying to understand clusters of cus-tomers in terms of their buying behavior and their buying characteristics. There are some traditional segmentation approaches: geography, demography, types of industry and the benefits. Then there are newer segmentation approaches: behavioral, situational, and psychographic.

Procurement professionals can learn market segmentation from sales and marketing. Segmenting the market can help them to shape and manage the supply market effectively. According to Michael Porter, a market can be segment with array of products and buyers.

Text Description automatically generated

Source: Porter, Michael E.. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (p. 234). Free Press. Kindle Edition.

In the scenario, the products that Dana needs to source is distinct in their features. The best way is to segment the market by product varieties.

Explanation

There are many factors that need to be considered when making a business decision. Costs and benefits are among those factor. To estimate the length of time in which an investment reaches a break-even point, businesses often use the payback period. The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment.

'Yes, because it takes everything into account': It ignores the time value of money (TVM), unlike other methods of capital budgeting such as net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and discounted cash flow.

'No, because payback period doesn’t take into account price fluctuations': Though it doesn't take into account price fluctuation, payback period is still useful in financial and capital budgeting.

'No, because payback period can be only used to calculate the depreciation of a fixed asset': Payback period only calculates the length of time in which the benefits of a charge repay its costs.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Explanation

In the scenario, the products have low value and high risk of supply. This group is known as bottleneck or critical in Kraljic's portfolio matrix. The objective for such items would be securing the supply. The company can achieve this goal by 'making' the products themselves, or finding an alternative option.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Explanation

A technical specification details the standards that a product or service must meet. Drawings (often called engineering drawings or technical drawings) are complementary to technical specifications

Explanation

Public annual reports can be a source of information that helps the procurement professional to analyse an industry's cost and revenue using the line of best fit. Line of best fit is one of the most important outputs of regression analysis. Regression refers to a quantitative measure of the relationship between one or more independent variables and a resulting dependent variable. Regression is of use to professionals in a wide range of fields from science and public service to financial analysis.

In this case, by collecting and analysing 17 annual reports, the procurement manager can find the line of best fit which goes approximately through the middle of the data points with an equal num-ber of data points above and below it.

The slope of the line of best fit is the approximate variable costs the industry. The easiest way to calculate it is to take a point at the right-hand end of the line of best fit and note its cost and output levels. Divide the cost by the output and this gives and approximate figure for the cost per unit of output or variable cost. This gives an approximate value for the industry fixed and variable costs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Specification Types)

Outcome (or output) specifications define what outcome must be achieved, leaving suppliers freedom to decide how.

They are appropriate when multiple solutions can deliver the same performance.

Option C directly reflects this.

Options A, B, and D contradict the flexibility principle.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Performance and outcome-based specifications”

“Encouraging innovation through output requirements”

Explanation

The threat of substitution is a function of three factors:

• The relative value/ price of a substitute compared to an industry’s product

• The cost of switching to the substitute

• The buyer’s propensity to switch

Buyers with different circumstances and in different industries do not all have equal propensities to substitute when faced with a comparable economic motivation. Differences in their circumstances lead buyers to respond to a given relative value to price (RVP) and switching cost differently. While such differences might be treated as factors that modify RVP or switching costs, it is more helpful in practice to isolate them.

Resources. Substitution often involves up-front investments of capital and other resources. Access to such resources will differ from one buyer to another.

Risk Profile. Buyers often have very different risk profiles, the result of such things as their past history, age and income, ownership structure, background and orientation of management, and nature of competition in their industry. Buyers prone to risk taking are more likely to substitute than buyers that are risk-averse.

Technological Orientation. Buyers experienced with technological change may be less concerned with some kinds of substitution risks, while extremely aware of others that a less technologically sophisticated buyer would be oblivious to.

Previous Substitutions. The second substitution may be easier for a buyer than the first, unless the first substitution has been a failure. The buyer’s uncertainties over undertaking a substitution may have diminished if a past substitution has been successful, or risen if a past substitution has led to difficulties. In the soft drink industry, this seems to have worked to the benefit of aspartame.

Intensity of Rivalry. Buyers under intense competitive pressure and searching for competitive ad-vantage will tend to substitute more quickly to gain a given advantage than those that are not.

Generic Strategy. The RVP of a substitute will have different significance depending on the com-petitive advantage that industrial, commercial, or institutional buyers are seeking or the value of time and particular performance needs of the household buyer. A substitute that offers a cost saving will tend to be of more interest to a cost leader than a differentiator, for example.

Many of these factors that shape the buyer’s propensity to substitute will be a function of the particular decision maker who is involved in the purchase decision.

Porter, Michael E.. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (p. 278-289). Free Press. Kindle Edition.

Explanation

A product’s life cycle portrays the length of time a product is in the market; from the beginning of its introduction to consumers until it is removed from shelves and phased out. This cycle is often divided into four phases: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. Depending on the relevant stage, companies will set an according strategy to achieve their desired targets. Pricing and promotions play a pivotal role in the design of these product life cycle strategies. Therefore, product life cycle management, the process of strategizing ways to continuously support and maintain a product, is seen more and more at pricing mature players and could bring real value to your company.

Introduction phase: during the introduction phase, the new product is introduced to consumers and a substantial amount of money is invested in advertising and marketing campaigns to bring awareness of the product to the customer. In this phase competition is low, but units sold will also correspondingly be quite low as well still. Consumers need to be convinced of the benefits of the product. Lots of articles never make it beyond this phase: e.g. 3D televisions.

Profits in the introduction stage tend to be low or there may even be a loss. This is because the cost of marketing to establish product awareness plus distribution costs can be far higher than the revenue received from sales. This can be offset to a degree by 'skimming' price in the very early stages. Skimming a price is where a business charges the highest price that it thinks the market will bear initially until product recognition brings in other buyers and then the price drop.

Growth phase: when it’s shown there is proven demand for the product and consumers are buying it, the next stage will be its growth phase. This phase is punctuated by increasing demand, increas-ing production and an increase in the competitive landscape. Availability of the product is under-standably paramount during this phase, going out of stock is unthinkable during the growth period.

The electric car is an example of a product that is currently in the midst of the growth phase.

Maturity phase: normally the maturity phase is the phase that is characterized by declining production and marketing costs due to synergies and economies of scale. During this phase the first signs of market saturation occur and most consumers or households already own the product. Sales numbers still grow, but at a slower pace. In the maturity phase, price competition becomes intense, a broader range of distribution channels are deployed and competition is more focused on competitive pricing, marginal product differences or the difference in services or promotions. This period in the PLC is often said to be the ‘cash-cow period’.

That being said, the idea of ‘Maturity from the start’ also exists. This occurs when a brand decides to launch a product extension and directly follows up the maturity phase of an earlier version of the product. For example, the iPhoneX followed up from the ‘normal’ iPhone-series and therefore the iPhoneX never had to undergo the introduction or growth phase, but immediately started in its maturity phase.

Decline phase: the final phase of the PLC is entered once the product loses market share to other, newer products and the competitive landscape becomes too hard to survive. During this stage, de-mand declines, companies are left with overstock with prices and margins getting depressed. Therefore retailers and brands normally start stunting with promotions during the decline of the PLC to sell their final stock.

A well-known example of a product that has been through the decline phase were the Nokia phones; sales results dramatically decreased after the introduction of the iPhone.

Explanation

Barriers to Entry to Agriculture: If stakeholders are going to address the need for new, conserva-tion-minded farmers, they must understand the barriers these farmers encounter when transitioning into the profession. A review of the literature revealed a number of barriers—most of them structural—to entry to agriculture. While each barrier is distinct, they are all interconnected. Though not an exhaustive list, the following barriers are ones that were most frequently mentioned in the literature:

- Access to Affordable Land

- Startup Capital

- Lack of Agricultural Knowledge and Experience

- Lack of Knowledge about Farm Business Planning

- Discrimination

- Student Loans

- Limited Access to Markets

- Affordable Housing and Affordable Healthcare

Source: Exploring the Barriers to Entry to Agriculture: Challenges Facing Beginning Farmers in North Carolina - Kelley Robbins-Thompson

Explanation

According to Michael Porter, the threat of substitution, is a function of three factors:

• The relative value/ price of a substitute compared to an industry’s product

• The cost of switching to the substitute

• The buyer’s propensity to switch

(Porter, Michael E.. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (p. 278). Free Press. Kindle Edition.)

Explanation

Price Analysis is the process of deciding if the asking price for a product or service is fair and rea-sonable, without examining the specific cost and profit calculations the vendor used in arriving at the price. It is basically a process of comparing the price with known indicators of reasonableness. When adequate price competition does not exist, some other form of analysis is required. Some reasons that could affect adequate price competition are: specifications are not definitive, tolerances are restrictive, or production capacity limits those eligible to bid.

Examples of other forms of price analysis information include:

• Analysis of previous prices paid

• Comparison of vendor’s price with the in-house estimate

• Comparison of quotations or published price lists from multiple vendors

• Comparisons with government agencies (such as GSA in the US) published prices

A strike price is the set price at which a derivative contract can be bought or sold when it is exercised. For call options, the strike price is where the security can be bought by the option holder; for put options, the strike price is the price at which the security can be sold. Strike price is also known as the exercise price.

A cost driver is the direct cause of a cost and its effect is on the total cost incurred. For example, if you are to determine the amount of electricity consumed in a particular period, the number of units consumed determines the total bill for electricity. In such a scenario, the number of units of electricity consumed is a cost driver.

Explanation

Start-up costs are generally low in service industries, and the main requirement is a level of knowledge and skill in that particular service.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Explanation

Composing a compelling business case requires the proposer to write in the language of the approvers. Generally, approvers are business executives or important shareholders whose major interest is the profitability of the firm. Business case proposer may embed the following contents:

- Return on investment: according to Investopedia, Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or compare the efficiency of a number of different investments. ROI tries to directly measure the amount of return on a particular investment, relative to the investment’s cost. A business case would seem more attractive if the proposal is expected to have high ROI.

- Time to market: Time-to-market (TTM) refers to the time from which a company initially con-ceives a product or service idea to the point when the actual product or service is accessible to buyers in the market (Afonso et al., 2008). The speed at which companies can introduce products into the market is critical for sustaining competitive advantage, and the reduction of product development cycle time has become a strategic objective for many technology-driven firms.

- Customer satisfaction: Keeping existing customer to stay in the business can affect greatly on the profit margin of a firm. A new proposal that finds the way to innovate while keeping the current customers satisfied may gain the interest of senior management.

- Improving productivity: Productivity is the measure of how efficient and effective a firm is. Im-proving the productivity means that with the same or lesser input, better output is generated. In-creasing productivity also improves the profitability of a company.

- Risk management: Any business activity contains inherent risks. For example, for a mining company to be truly responsible, it must keep all of its workers safe, healthy and motivated, meet the expectations of the local community and government for the region in which it is operating, ensure it impacts on the environment positively if at all, as well as achieve the financial objectives set by its investors for both the short and long term. Managing risks well improves the production throughput and maintains customer satisfaction.

In the scenario, Robert is trying to convince the senior management to adopt e-procurement system by insisting on potential productivity improvement. This is the right approach. A business plan should engage and please senior management and directors. An appealing business case tells them how important things to the business (such as productivity, return on investment, customer satisfaction or costs) are affected by the plan.

Explanation

Overhead variances arise when the actual overhead costs incurred differ from the expected amounts. Managers want to understand the reasons for these differences, and so should consider computing one or more of the overhead variances described below. Each of these variances applies to a different aspect of overhead expenditures. It is not necessary to calculate these variances when a manager cannot influence their outcome.

Fixed Overhead Spending Variance

The fixed overhead spending variance is the difference between the actual fixed overhead expense incurred and the budgeted fixed overhead expense. An unfavorable variance means that actual fixed overhead expenses were greater than anticipated. The formula for this variance is:

Actual fixed overhead - Budgeted fixed overhead = Fixed overhead spending variance

The amount of expense related to fixed overhead should (as the name implies) be relatively fixed, and so the fixed overhead spending variance should not theoretically vary much from the budget.

Fixed Overhead Volume Variance

The fixed overhead volume variance is the difference between the amount of fixed overhead actually applied to produced goods based on production volume, and the amount that was budgeted to be applied to produced goods. For example, a company budgets for the allocation of $25,000 of fixed overhead costs to produced goods at the rate of $50 per unit produced, with the expectation that 500 units will be produced. However, the actual number of units produced is 600, so a total of $30,000 of fixed overhead costs are allocated. This creates a fixed overhead volume variance of $5,000.

Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance

The variable overhead efficiency variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted hours worked, which are then applied to the standard variable overhead rate per hour. The formula is:

Standard overhead rate x (Actual hours - Standard hours)

= Variable overhead efficiency variance

A favorable variance means that the actual hours worked were less than the budgeted hours, resulting in the application of the standard overhead rate across fewer hours, resulting in less expense being incurred. However, a favorable variance does not necessarily mean that a company has incurred less actual overhead, it simply means that there was an improvement in the allocation base what was used to apply overhead.

Variable Overhead Spending Variance

The variable overhead spending variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted rates of spending on variable overhead. The variance is used to focus attention on those overhead costs that vary from expectations. The formula is:

Actual hours worked x (Actual overhead rate - standard overhead rate)

= Variable overhead spending variance

A favorable variance means that the actual variable overhead expenses incurred per labor hour were less than expected.

In the study guide, CIPS splits overhead variance into volume and expenditure variance. They can be understood as variable and fixed overhead variance respectively.

Explanation

Cracks on the jet engine is a closed-end problem. A typical problem solving process has 8 steps:

Step 1: Define the Problem

- What is the problem?

- How did you discover the problem?

- When did the problem start and how long has this problem been going on?

- Is there enough data available to contain the problem and prevent it from getting passed to the next process step? If yes, contain the problem.

Step 2: Clarify the Problem

- What data is available or needed to help clarify, or fully understand the problem?

- Is it a top priority to resolve the problem at this point in time?

- Are additional resources required to clarify the problem? If yes, elevate the problem to your leader to help locate the right resources and form a team.

- Consider a Lean Event (Do-it, Burst, RPI, Project).

- Ensure the problem is contained and does not get passed to the next process step.

Step 3: Define the Goals

- What is your end goal or desired future state?

- What will you accomplish if you fix this problem?

- What is the desired timeline for solving this problem?

Step 4: Identify Root Cause of the Problem

- Identify possible causes of the problem.

- Prioritize possible root causes of the problem.

- What information or data is there to validate the root cause?

Step 5: Develop Action Plan

- Generate a list of actions required to address the root cause and prevent problem from getting to others.

- Assign an owner and timeline to each action.

- Status actions to ensure completion.

Step 6: Execute Action Plan

- Implement action plan to address the root cause.

- Verify actions are completed.

Step 7: Evaluate the Results

- Monitor and Collect Data.

- Did you meet your goals defined in step 3? If not, repeate th 8-Step Process.

- Were there any unforeseen consequences?

- If problem is resolved, remove activities that were added previously to contain the problem.

Step 8: Continuously Improve

- Look for additional opportunities to implement solution.

- Ensure problem will not come back and communicate lessons learned.

- If needed, repeat the 8-Step Problem Solving Process to drive further improvements.

ANA has already known what is going on, the next step they should adopt is collecting more infor-mation on the problem. If the airline is hurry to the solution, it may choose 'Generate options ad-dressing the issue'. The crack on turbine blade can be welded, or the airline replaces a new blade. However, jumping to solution without knowing the root cause does not completely solve the prob-lem. The root cause is unaddressed, then it may occur in the future. Therefore, the airline should still collect information to find the root cause, then remove it.

Explanation

There are many types of barriers to entry into a market. Some of these include:

- Economies of Scale: When manufacturing or selling at a large scale, companies are able to avail cost advantages because per unit costs of the product fall. So the more the company produces in quantity the more the benefit. When existing companies have this advantage, it can act as a barrier to entry because a new entrant will have to try to match the scale to achieve the same cost ad-vantage as the existing company. This may not be possible at the initial stage.

- A Differentiated Product: If the product being sold by the existing company or companies is highly differentiated or enjoys strong brand loyalty, then this can act as a strong barrier to entry. The new entrant will have to invest in creating a product with newer and unique features and bene-fits that surpass those offered by the old company. In addition, there will need to be strong efforts to break existing brand loyalties and shift them to a new untested company.

- High Capital Costs: If an industry requires huge capital investments at the onset, then this will act as a barrier to entry for many of the potential entrants. Only those will attempt to enter the competitive fray who have the resources to make this high initial investment.

- Other Cost Advantages: Apart from those cost benefits that come from economies of scale, there are other advantages that an existing firm may enjoy. These include access to the best suppliers, an understanding of existing materials and knowledge of their quality, possession of any necessary and important patents, and proprietary information and technological knowledge. There are also learning advantages, achieved over years of business and experience.

- Cost of Switching: The cost associated with a consumer’s move from one company or product or another is called the switching cost. If there are significant switching costs, then a new entrant may not be able to create means of removing these. Or, they may have to offer significant advantage to counter these switching costs at their own expense.

- Distribution Network: Often, distribution relationships are well established and may prove to be a strong barrier to entry for a new company. A new entrant will obviously need access to these dis-tribution channels but will need to invest extra in order to engage distributors who have established relations with existing competitors.

- Suppliers: As with distributors, suppliers may be vital to the operations of a new business. Exist-ing suppliers may have contracts or loyalties with existing companies and may prove to be difficult to form relationships with.

- Legal and Government Created Barriers: Government and regulatory requirements such as permits and licenses may be a strong barrier to entry. There may also be laws governing ways to conduct business that may conflict with a company’s practices in other countries.

- Barriers to Exit: Interestingly, barriers to exit may act as a deterrent to entry by new companies. If a company is unable to easily leave a competitive environment in case business does not work out, then it will have to stay and compete even if that is a detrimental business practice. In this case, the company may choose to not enter the market in the first place.

Explanation

Kano model of excitement and basic quality (Kano et al, 1984; Berger et al, 1993; Matzler et al, 1996) brings a different perspective for the analysis of improvement opportunities in products and services because it takes in consideration the asymmetrical and non-linear relationship between performance and satisfaction. The Kano model classifies customers requirements in three categories (figure 3):

a) Basic Requirements. The basic requirements fulfill the basic functions of a product. If they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will be extremely dissatisfied. On the other hand, if they are present or have sufficient performance, they don't bring satisfaction. Customers see them as prerequisites. For instance, for luxury automobiles, "air bags" are considered basic. A customer won't feel satisfied if the automobile has "air bag", however he/she will not buy it if “air bag” is not present.

b) Performance Requirements. As for these requirements, satisfaction is proportional to the performance level – the higher the performance, the higher the customer's satisfaction will be and vice-versa. Gas consumption in automobiles is an example of these requirements. Usually customers explicitly demand performance requirements.

c) Excitement Requirements. These requirements are key to customer satisfaction. If they are pre-sent or have sufficient performance, they will bring superior satisfaction. On the other hand, if they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will not get dissatisfied. For instance, a surprise gift at the end of a dinner in a restaurant will certainly bring satisfaction, but it will not cause dissatisfaction if not offered. These requirements are not demanded nor expected by customers.

Two other types of requirements may be identified in the Kano model: neutral and reverse ones. Neutral requirements do not bring either satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Reverse requirements bring more satisfaction if absent than if present.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Explanation

Basically, IKEA project team is undertaking the following process:

A picture containing text, businesscard Description automatically generated

This is a typical benchmarking process. Benchmarking is defined as the process of measuring products, services, and processes against those of organizations known to be leaders in one or more aspects of their operations. Benchmarking provides necessary insights to help you understand how your organization compares with similar organizations, even if they are in a different business or have a different group of customers.

In the scenario, benchmarking process is undertaken within subsidiaries of IKEA, thus it is internal.

Detailed Explanation:

ISO standards are internationally recognised benchmarks that ensure quality and safety, making them applicable across various industries, including spare parts procurement. This approach improves reliability and supplier compliance. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Standardisation in Procurement.

Explanation

When using conformance specification, the buying organisation is responsible for the performance of the purchase. If the product fails due to poorly designed specification, the buyer is wholly responsible for it. It cannot blame the supplier for the failure because they still provided 'fit for purpose' product.

'Time to produce specification is shortened': Conformance specification requires details on dimen-sion, materials, design, etc. With such requirements, time to produce a complete conformance specification is often longer than producing performance specification.

'Buyer cannot control the inputs': Conformance specification is a list of inputs from buyer, so buyer has control over the inputs that will make the product. It also means that buyer is responsible for any product failure.

'Buyer may face liquidity risks': Liquidity means that how quick a business turns its assets into cash. This is a financial term, it does not link directly with specification failure.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 clearly distinguishes between conformance and performance specifications.

A conformance specification describes exactly what the item must be like – dimensions, materials, design drawings, tolerances, etc.

It is appropriate when the buyer already has a detailed design and simply wants the supplier to manufacture to that design.

In this scenario:

The buyer’s organisation has designed the specialist item and has a detailed specification.

They cannot manufacture it in-house, but they need the item exactly as designed.

This is precisely when CIPS says a conformance specification is appropriate: the purpose is to ensure the supplier delivers exactly what has been specified and that the item meets all the buyer’s technical and functional requirements.

Option D matches this principle exactly.

Option A mentions cost-effectiveness, which might happen, but it is not the main reason for using conformance specifications.

Options B and C describe issues that are either irrelevant or are more associated with over-specification or missed innovation opportunities, not with the basic correctness of using conformance specifications in this situation.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Types of specification: conformance vs performance vs outcome

When to use buyer-designed (conformance) specifications

Risks and benefits of restricting supplier design freedom

Explanation

3D-printed parts can replace traditional metal parts. They are also more easily customised to fit customer's needs. This technology is an example of threat of substitute in Porter's Five Forces model.

Substitute goods or services that can be used in place of a company's products or services pose a threat. Companies that produce goods or services for which there are no close substitutes will have more power to increase prices and lock in favorable terms. When close substitutes are available, customers will have the option to forgo buying a company's product, and a company's power can be weakened.

Explanation

Value Analysis (VA) is concerned with existing products. It involves a current product being ana-lysed and evaluated by a team, to reduce costs, improve product function or both. Value Analysis exercises use a plan which step-by-step, methodically evaluates the product in a range of areas. These include costs, function, alternative components and design aspects such as ease of manufac-ture and assembly.

According to the Value Methodology standard, there are 6 phases to a Value Analysis:

- Information

- Function Analysis

- Creative

- Evaluation

- Development

- Presentation

1. Information

In this first phase, the team attempts to understand why the project exists and who or what it is to produce. They obtain project data, present the original design or product concepts, and understand the project scope. Schedule, costs, budget, risk, and other non-monetary issues are studied until the team is comfortable with the concept of the project, what it is to produce, and who its end users are.

This step also includes things like site visits and meetings with the project team, if required. Project documents like plans, drawings, specifications, and reports are obtained and the value engineering team becomes familiar with them.

2. Function Analysis

This step represents the meat and potatoes (core) of the value analysis. The team attempts to determine the functions the project serves. Functions come in two forms:

- Primary functions are those that represent the reason for the project’s existence, for example, a building project might have adequate plumbing as a primary function.

- Secondary functions are those that the project serves without being core to the project. For example, a building project might have as a secondary function maintaining the view of the neighboring building.

The functions are described in verb/noun pairs, such as “supply water to all suites,” or “Maintain view of adjacent park.” For a project like this, the team should come up with 10 – 15 functions. You might be surprised how many secondary functions exist for most projects. Subject matter experts would be a great resource, but in their absence an appropriate level of brainstorming and analysis are necessary.

The team should also identify value-mismatched functions to focus the improvements on. For ex-ample, maybe a large obstruction is preventing the view of the adjacent park from too many suites resulting in a potential mismatch of the cost vs. functional benefit. This is investigated in the next step.

3. Creative

This phase represents the generation of improvement ideas. The team develops alternative ways that the project can perform the functions that have been identified. At this step, the functions are looked at individually and each one gets a list of alternative ways to perform the function. There is no judging between the importance of the various functions.

4. Evaluation

At this stage, a priority is given to each project improvement idea. The ideas are discussed and potential costs are determined. Once the risk-reward profile of each idea is itemized, the team has determined which ideas are worth implementing into the project or feature.

A few years ago, there was a pedestrian bridge built near my home which was originally designed for emergency vehicles. Although this type of design is standard practice for the bridges of this type, the value engineering team identified that emergency vehicle passage was not needed (verb/noun pair = ‘maintain passage for emergency vehicles‘). Also, a second major outcome of this value analysis was to change the design to an aesthetic, curved bridge because it was in a prominent location. The redesign of the bridge cost some money but this was more than made up by the cost of the bridge construction. Thus, the value analysis paid for itself about 10 times over in the reduced construction cost, and the bridge was significantly more aesthetic.

5. Development

Once the value improvement options have been whittled down to the ones that make sense, the value engineering team develop the options to the point of passing them back to the original project team. They must be clearly written and explained so that the project owner and stakeholders can understand how it benefits the project and act on it. Any potential negative factors are identified. Potential costs and cost savings are itemized.

6. Presentation

This last phase represents the presentation of the alternatives to the stakeholders. Often value engineering represents a change in the normal practices that people are used to, an “out of the box thinking.” Thus the best salesperson on the team is often the best one to do the presentation.

Some typical products of a value engineering analysis are a briefing document, risk analy-sis, present worth analysis, advantages vs. disadvantages, etc.

Explanation

A firm also has to look at a myriad of other factors before setting its prices. Those factors include the offering’s costs, the demand, the customers whose needs it is designed to meet, the external environment—such as the competition, the economy, and government regulations—and other aspects of the marketing mix, such as the nature of the offering, the current stage of its product life cycle, and its promotion and distribution. If a company plans to sell its products or services in international markets, research on the factors for each market must be analyzed before setting prices. Organizations must understand buyers, competitors, the economic conditions, and political regulations in other markets before they can compete successfully.

[...]

The costs of the product—its inputs—including the amount spent on product development, testing, and packaging required have to be taken into account when a pricing decision is made. So do the costs related to promotion and distribution. For example, when a new offering is launched, its promotion costs can be very high because people need to be made aware that it exists. Thus, the offering’s stage in the product life cycle can affect its price.

Detailed Explanation:

A (Early supplier involvement): Engaging suppliers early fosters innovation by leveraging their expertise in developing solutions.

D (Outcome-based specification): Focusing on outcomes rather than rigid inputs encourages creative and flexible proposals.Conformance specifications (C) restrict innovation, and standards (E) limit supplier flexibility. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Innovation in Procurement Specifications.

Explanation

Payback period is the time in which the initial outlay of an investment is expected to be recovered through the cash inflows generated by the investment. It is one of the simplest investment apprais-al techniques.

Since cash flow estimates are quite accurate for periods in the near future and relatively inaccurate for periods in distant future due to economic and operational uncertainties, payback period is an indicator of risk inherent in a project because it takes initial inflows into account and ignores the cash flows after the point at which the initial investment is recovered.

The formula to calculate the payback period of an investment depends on whether the periodic cash inflows from the project are even or uneven.

If the cash inflows are even (such as for investments in annuities), the formula to calculate payback period is:

Payback Period = Initial Investment / Net Cash Flow per Period

When cash inflows are uneven, we need to calculate the cumulative net cash flow for each period and then use the following formula:

Payback Period =A + (B/C)

Where,

A is the last period number with a negative cumulative cash flow;

B is the absolute value (i.e. value without negative sign) of cumulative net cash flow at the end of the period A; and

C is the total cash inflow during the period following period A

Cumulative net cash flow is the sum of inflows to date, minus the initial outflow.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 warns against over-specification – defining requirements in more detail, higher quality, or tighter tolerances than are actually needed. Key consequences include:

Increased costs – suppliers incur higher production and quality costs, which are passed on to the buyer.

Fewer potential suppliers – only a small number can meet the demanding specification.

More complex supplier relationships – closer collaboration and management may be needed to meet the demanding spec.

Assessing each statement:

Ineffective SLA – if the specification is unnecessarily detailed or unrealistic, SLAs can become difficult to meet, overly complex, or focused on the wrong priorities. Likely outcome.

Higher supplier costs – very clearly a result of over-specification (tight tolerances, special materials, complex processes).

Increased SRM – when the requirement is demanding and fewer suppliers can comply, buyers often need more intensive SRM to manage performance and risk.

Reduced inventory costs – this is not a typical outcome of over-specification; if anything, higher unit costs and longer lead times can increase inventory risks and carrying costs.

Thus 1, 2 and 3 are in line with CIPS treatment of over-specification; 4 is not, so:

Correct option: C (1, 2 and 3 only)

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Dangers of over-specification (cost, risk, supplier base)

Service Level Agreements and realistic performance measures

The role of SRM in managing complex or high-dependency suppliers

Explanation

From the scenario, you can see that the project team is developing a new product. They start with analysing the functions, and the costs of delivering those functions. This is a typical process of value engineering. You may read more on value engineering from the reference paper.

Explanation

Using standards in specification is very convenient. They reduce the time and effort to produce. They tend to be very accurate with correct technical terminologies. They are well recognised and accepted by a wide range of suppliers and buyers. However, since a standard is very specific, complex and lengthy, it requires a lot of time to be drafted and approved. Therefore, standard tends to be static and don't encourage innovation. It may also not accommodate latest technology and trends.

Explanation

According to Kraljic portfolio matrix, the low-value items with high supply risk are bottleneck items.

The purchasing strategy that is commonly recommended for these products is primarily based on acceptance of the dependence and reduction of the negative effects of the unfavourable position. An alternative strategy suggested by purchasing practitioners is to find other suppliers and move towards the non-critical quadrant.

- Accept dependence, reduce negative consequences: The main focus of this strategy is to assure supply, if necessary even at additional cost. Examples of this strategy are keeping extra stocks of the materials concerned or developing consigned stock agreements with suppliers. By performing a risk analysis firms can identify the most important bottleneck products and consider the implications. A possible action for dealing with unexpected bad dependence positions for certain products is to employ contingency planning.

- Reduce dependence and risk, find other solutions: This strategy is geared towards reducing the dependence on the supplier. The most common way to achieve this is to broaden the specifications of the product or to search for new suppliers.

The procurement team in the scenario has selected reducing dependency by finding alternatives. This is a right strategy for bottleneck item.

Explanation

Risk control is the process by which an organization reduces the likelihood of a risk event occurring or mitigates the effects that risk should it occur. CIPS preferred way to determine your risk control strategy is to use the four T’s Process:

Transferring Risk can be achieved through the use of various forms of insurance, or the payment to third parties who are prepared to take the risk on behalf of the organization

Tolerating Risk is where no action is taken to mitigate or reduce a risk. This may be because the cost of instituting risk reduction or mitigation activity is not cost-effective or the risks of impact are at so low that they are deemed acceptable to the business. Even when these risks are tolerated they should be monitored because future changes may make it no longer tolerable.

Treating Risk is a method of controlling risk through actions that reduce the likelihood of the risk occurring or minimize its impact prior to its occurrence. Also, there are contingent measures that can be developed to reduce the impact of an event once it has occurred. Finding an alternative sup-plier is an example of treating the risk.

Terminating Risk is the simplest and most often ignored method of dealing with risk. It is the ap-proach that should be most favored where possible and simply involves risk elimination. This can be done by altering an inherently risky process or practice to remove the risk. The same can be used when reviewing practices and processes in all areas of the business.

If an item presents a risk and can be changed or removed without it materially affecting the busi-ness, then removing the risk should be the first option considered; rather than attempting the treat, tolerate or transfer it.

Explanation

In construction, specifications are written documents that describe the materials and workmanship required for a development. They do not include cost, quantity or drawn information but need to be read alongside other contract documentation such as quantities, schedules and drawings.

Specifications vary considerably depending on the stage to which the design has been developed, ranging from performance (open) specifications that require further design by a contractor or sup-plier, to prescriptive (closed) specifications where the design is already complete when the project is tendered.

Prescriptive specifications give the client more certainty about the end product when they make their final investment decision (i.e. when they appoint the contractor), whereas a performance specification gives the contractor and suppliers more scope to innovate and adopt cost effective methods of work, potentially offering better value for money.

Typically, performance specifications are written on projects that are straight-forward, standard building types, whereas prescriptive specifications are written for more complex buildings, or buildings where the client has requirements that might not be familiar to contractors and where certainty regarding the exact nature of the completed development is more important to the client.

Performance specification has some disadvantages:

- Well-defined performance metrics are needed to ensure that the specified performance will achieve the desired outcome

- Require reliable, practical, economical tests of performance

- Evaluations are subjective and require additional time and effort to complete

Therefore, if a performance specification is used, the buying organisation will have to ensure that they are able to define and conduct tests on whether supplier's solution can deliver the desired out-come.

Explanation

A conformance specification is a specification that defines the technical and physical characteristics and/or measurements of a product, such as physical aspects (e.g. dimensions, colour, and surface finish), design details, material properties, energy requirements, processes, maintenance requirements and operational requirements.

On the other hand, performance specification typically includes list of output or outcome or func-tional requirements. Brand name can be a part of performance specification because brand is a re-minder of quality that customers remember. For example, when talking about Roll Royce, people will think about an elegant car.

Explanation

Kano model of excitement and basic quality (Kano et al, 1984; Berger et al, 1993; Matzler et al, 1996) brings a different perspective for the analysis of improvement opportunities in products and services because it takes in consideration the asymmetrical and non-linear relationship between performance and satisfaction. The Kano model classifies customers requirements in three categories (figure 3):

a) Basic Requirements (or Must-be requirement). The basic requirements fulfill the basic func-tions of a product. If they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will be extremely dissatisfied. On the other hand, if they are present or have sufficient performance, they don't bring satisfaction. Customers see them as prerequisites. For instance, for luxury automobiles, "air bags" are considered basic. A customer won't feel satisfied if the automobile has "air bag", however he/she will not buy it if “air bag” is not present.

b) Performance Requirements (or One-dimensional requirements). As for these requirements, satisfaction is proportional to the performance level – the higher the performance, the higher the customer's satisfaction will be and vice-versa. Gas consumption in automobiles is an example of these requirements. Usually customers explicitly demand performance requirements.

c) Excitement Requirements (or Attractive requirements). These requirements are key to cus-tomer satisfaction. If they are present or have sufficient performance, they will bring superior satisfaction. On the other hand, if they are not present or their performance is insufficient, customers will not get dissatisfied. For instance, a surprise gift at the end of a dinner in a restaurant will certainly bring satisfaction, but it will not cause dissatisfaction if not offered. These requirements are not demanded nor expected by customers.

Two other types of requirements may be identified in the Kano model: neutral and reverse ones. Neutral requirements do not bring either satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Reverse require-ments bring more satisfaction if absent than if present.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Explanation

Through-life Management involves the life-cycle management of the products, services and activities required to deliver a fully integrated capability to the customer, while reducing the cost of ownership for the customer.

Diagram, table Description automatically generated

Source: Andrew Graves

The installation stage occurs in In-Service Operations. At this stage, the machinery is shipped and installed on the buyer's premises and check to ensure that it is working to the standards set out in the design specification.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Cost Management)

CIPS teaches that effective buyers conduct cost breakdowns that include both direct and indirect costs, using data from:

Supplier financial reports,

Benchmarking,

Industry cost models.

Thus, buyers can analyse indirect costs (e.g. overheads, utilities, admin) to strengthen negotiation positions.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Cost analysis and supplier price build-up

Using cost data to negotiate value

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Cost Management and Analysis)

CIPS teaches that indirect costs (e.g. overheads, admin, factory costs) can be estimated by using:

Supplier financial statements,

Benchmarking,

Industry cost models.

Analysing these supports negotiations by revealing true cost drivers.

Therefore, Option B is correct — buyers can and should assess indirect costs when evaluating total cost and negotiating.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Understanding direct and indirect cost elements”

“Cost analysis and should-cost models in business case preparation”

Explanation

The hospital is buying too many product variants. This may cause bottleneck in its operation and increase operational expense. So procurement manager suggests to standardise products.

This is an example of the benefits of product standardisation:

Saint Thomas Health, a system of 5 hospitals, needed to find a way to reduce costs. They were purchasing different SKUs for products that were very similar, in this case, labels. They bought label rolls for $3 and a very similar product for $1. This oversight in product purchases impacted the overall costs of the system. After partnering with a sole source vendor it was able to save $200,000 over a four year span. They accomplished this simply by standardizing label products. These savings, however, only account for the immediate savings from standardizing products. The saving that are not factored into that number are the savings from soft or hidden costs.

On a national scale, hospitals lose millions of dollars per year in hidden expenses due to missed opportunities for cost containment and incorporation. Some of the hidden elements that increase overall costs for a healthcare provider include the following:

- Redundant purchasing

- Freight

- Excessive purchase orders

- Multiple vendor relations

- Low efficiency

- Joint commission fines

- HAI

By implementing product standardization, hospitals and health systems reduce vendors, are able to reduce SKUs, purchase orders, inefficiency, freight costs, fines, and off-contract spending. All of this adds up to large savings for the organization as a whole.

96% of the respondents in the survey agree that consolidating suppliers and standardizing product purchases across organization would reduce hidden costs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 explains that general inflation indices (like consumer or retail price indices) are based on a basket of goods and services for the whole economy, not tailored to a specific company’s imports or input mix.

For an engineering business importing from the USA, its price changes will depend on:

Specific industrial input price indices (e.g. metals, components, specialist goods),

Exchange rate movements GBP/USD,

Sector-specific factors (technology, capacity, freight, tariffs).

Therefore, simply “adding a published inflation index” to last year’s prices cannot precisely predict next year’s prices, particularly when:

The index may include irrelevant items like food, clothing, local services, etc.

It may not reflect the specific mix of industrial inputs or the effects of exchange rates.

Thus:

Option A correctly explains the limitation: the inflation index may include products and services that are not relevant to the company’s purchases.

Option B mentions price adjustment formulas (which can be more precise if designed well), but the question emphasises whether using a general index alone is precise – option A goes straight to the core reason.

Options C and D describe partial truths (indices can show general trends and give a quick check) but they do not support precise forecasting.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Use and limitations of inflation indices in cost forecasting

Factors influencing prices in international procurement (currency, indices, market conditions)

Building realistic cost assumptions in a business case

Explanation

One of the biggest disruptors in retail has been e-commerce. According to a report by IDC, in the month of December 2018, which is also the holiday season in the west, the e-commerce sector globally, has grown by 20 percent.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Market Dynamics)

When substitute products are available, buyers can easily switch to alternatives, lowering loyalty and increasing price sensitivity.

Thus, Option C correctly identifies the key factor enabling frequent switching.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Impact of substitute products on buyer behaviour”

“Porter’s Five Forces – threat of substitutes”

Explanation

Target costing is an activity aimed at reducing the life-cycle costs of new products, while ensuring quality, reliability, and other consumer requirements by examining all possible ideas for cost reduction at the product planning, research and development and prototyping phases of production. But it is not just a cost reduction technique; it is part of a comprehensive strategic profit management system.

Explanation

The scenario is very long with many distracting data. Students need to read carefully and use their experience to solve this problem.

The company is developing a new component which requires different type of material. But this component will not be available for mass production in 1.5 years. This means the company still needs to produce the current components with current materials until the development is finished. They must continue purchase the materials from current supplier through call-off orders. This situation is an example of straight re-buy.

Explanation

An Outcome Based Specification (OBS) focuses on the desired outcome of a service in business terms, rather than a detailed technical specification of how the service is to be provided; this allows providers scope to propose innovative solutions that might not have occurred to the procurement team. Outcome should be distinguished from output, which is the measurable results of a set of inputs. The example of difference between outcome and output is written at the bottom of page 123 in the study guide.

Outcomes should be the starting point in making new specification. However, using outcome-based specification has some setbacks:

- First, it is not easy to measure the outcomes. Usually, outcome of a project is a statement like 'increase customer satisfaction', 'maintain ambient temperature' or 'provide a convenient way to do something'. They are not easy to measure as output.

- Second, sometimes the desired outcomes require time to be materialised

- Third, outcomes can be ambiguous

Detailed Explanation:

A strong business case includes a clear assessment of costs, the expected benefits, and the viable options available. These criteria ensure a structured approach to decision-making and alignment with strategic goals. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Business Case Development.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Specification Design)

Performance specifications describe what the product or service must achieve, not how to achieve it.

CIPS recommends them when:

Innovation or supplier expertise is desired, and

Outcomes can be measured functionally.

For an intelligent IT system, suppliers can design innovative solutions if the focus is on performance outcomes rather than technical conformance.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Types of specifications (performance, conformance, output)

Encouraging innovation through supplier freedom

Detailed Explanation:

Conformance specifications are appropriate when the buyer has precise requirements that must be met. This ensures the final product aligns perfectly with the company’s needs, even if it limits supplier flexibility. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Conformance Specification in Procurement.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

In CIPS L4M2, a business case is defined as the document or analysis that:

Sets out the need or problem,

Identifies and compares options (including “do nothing”),

Assesses the costs, benefits, risks and impacts of each option,

Provides a clear recommendation supported by evidence.

Its primary purpose is to provide decision-makers with a justification for investment or change, based on a structured evaluation.

Thus:

Option A – correctly describes the main purpose: assessing costs and benefits of options.

Options B, C and D – these are decisions or outputs that might be informed by a business case, but they are not what a business case “allows” by definition.

Approving sourcing strategies or supplier lists is normally part of procurement governance, influenced by the business case but not the same as it.

Approving final spend is a financial approval decision that follows from the business case evaluation.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Structure and purpose of a business case

Option appraisal, costs, benefits and risk analysis

The role of the business case in justifying external sourcing

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Sustainable Specification Writing)

Environmental criteria address resource use, pollution, waste, and emissions.

For machinery, specifying maximum emission limits or energy efficiency ratings ensures sustainability compliance.

Brand, location, or supplier nationality are not environmental factors.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Environmental sustainability criteria in technical specifications”

“Life cycle environmental performance”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS uses the classic buying situation model:

New buy – first time the item is purchased; high information need and perceived risk.

Straight re-buy – routine repurchase of a product that has been bought before and is well-known.

Modified re-buy – a repeat purchase with some changes (e.g. spec, price, supplier).

Here, the equipment is brand new to market, meaning:

It has not been purchased before by the organisation.

There is no previous sourcing history for this specific product, so it cannot be a straight re-buy.

Thus:

Option D is correct – it is not a straight re-buy because it has not been specified or sourced before.

Option A is incorrect – even if the supplier has been used before, the product is new.

Option B – there cannot be an “existing specification” for something new to the market; if there is, it would be a modified or straight re-buy, not a new product situation.

Option C – a standing purchase agreement would imply established purchasing arrangements: that contradicts “brand new to market”.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Buying situations: new buy, straight re-buy, modified re-buy

Implications for information gathering, evaluation and risk

How new products affect sourcing and market management

Explanation

Primary activities consist of inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, sales & marketing, service.

Second activities consist of firm infrastructure, human resource management, technology development and procurement

The following graph illustrate the value chain (Source: Smartsheet)

Graphical user interface, diagram Description automatically generated

Picking and delivery components is inbound logistics.

Maintenance is an example of operations activity.

Sourcing transportation services is an activity of procurement

Assembly design is an activity in research and development (Technology)

Recruiting is an activity of human resource management

Explanation

Functional benchmarking is a comparison to similar or identical practices (e.g., the picking process for assembling customer orders, maintaining inventory controls of spare computer parts, logistics to move operational forces, etc.) within the same or similar functions outside the immediate industry. Functional benchmarking might identify practices that are superior in your functional areas in whatever industry they may exist. Functional benchmarking would be accomplished at the federal level by comparing the IRS collections process against those of American Express. Comparing copper mining techniques to coal mining techniques is an example in the private sector.

Benefits

- Provides industry trend information

- Quantitative comparisons

- Better improvement rate

Challenges

- Diverse corporate cultures

- Great need for specificity

- Not invented here. syndrome

- Common functions can be difficult to find

- Takes more time than internal or percent

- Must be able to visualize how to adapt the best practices

Source: USN Benchmarking Handbook

LO 1, AC 1.3

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Supply Market Analysis)

Supplier power is high when:

Few suppliers exist relative to demand → less competition.

Urgent demand gives suppliers leverage over buyers.

A and D would reduce supplier power; C (educated buyer) also weakens it.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Porter’s Five Forces – supplier power

Market structure and urgency as power drivers