HP HPE6-A47 Dumps

 The correct answer is option C, conversion of the existing Instant APs to campus APs (CAPs). This is because the existing Instant APs can be converted to CAPs by changing their operating mode and pointing them to the MC. This way, the customer can leverage the existing APs and avoid purchasing new ones. The MC can then provide centralized management, configuration, and control for the APs.

Option A is incorrect because the purchase of Universal APs is not necessary. Universal APs are APs that can operate in either Instant or CAP mode without requiring a conversion. However, the existing APs can be converted to CAPs without buying new ones.

Option B is incorrect because Aruba ClearPass is not required to onboard the APs as CAPs in the new MC-based deployment. Aruba ClearPass is a network access control (NAC) solution that provides authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) services for wired and wireless devices. It is not involved in the conversion of Instant APs to CAPs.

Option D is incorrect because a Virtual Mobility Controller (VMC) is not a valid option to control Instant APs. A VMC is a software-based MC that runs on a hypervisor. It can control CAPs, but not Instant APs. Instant APs can only be controlled by another Instant AP acting as a Virtual Controller (VC).

References: The information can be referenced from the official HPE documents and learning materials available on HPE Press and Aruba Networks. Specifically, it aligns with the objectives outlined in Chapter 6: Wireless Network Design, where the Instant and CAP modes and the MC options are discussed. Designing Aruba Solutions Official Certification Study Guide Aruba Instant User Guide Aruba Mobility Controller Data Sheet

This answer is correct because it follows the best practice design for routing the wireless traffic in a VHD wireless solution. By having the MCs act at Layer2, the architectcan enable the use of clustering, which provides high availability, load balancing, and seamless roaming for wireless users. By having the core routing switches act as the default gateway, the architect can avoid tunneling the wireless traffic to the MCs, which reduces the network overhead and latency. This also allows the core routing switches to apply security policies and QoS to the wireless traffic based on the user roles assigned by the MCs. References:

• Aruba Certified Design Professional Official Certification Study Guide (HPE6-A47) - Chapter 6)
• Aruba Validated Reference Design: Very High Density 802.11ac Networks - Chapter 4)
• Aruba Mobility Controller Clustering - Data sheet)

References:

• 4: https://blog.router-switch.com/2020/11/data-center-design-basic-3-layers-core-aggregation-and-access/
• 1: https://community.cisco.com/t5/data-center-and-cloud-knowledge-base/datacenter-core-and-aggregation-design/ta-p/3135946
• 2: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/ccna-data-center/9780133860429/ch01lev3sec2.html
• 3: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_64x_WebHelp/Content/ArubaFrameStyles/VLANs/Extending_VLANs.htm

The transceivers that the architect should recommend for each pair of switches are two QSPF+ MPO. This option would provide 40 Gbps bandwidth per link, which is enough to meet the customer requirement of 80 Gbps for the link aggregation. The QSPF+ MPO transceivers use a single multi-fiber connector that can support up to 12 fibers, which is compatible with the customer’s existing OM4 multi-mode fiber infrastructure. The QSPF+ MPO transceivers also support distances up to 100 meters, which is sufficient for the customer’s inter-building connections.

The other options are not optimal for the customer requirement because they either provide insufficient bandwidth or require additional fiber strands. Two QSPF+ BiDi transceivers would provide only 20 Gbps bandwidth per link, which is half of the customer requirement. Eight SFP+ LR or SR transceivers would provide 80 Gbps bandwidth per link, which is more than the customer requirement, but they would also require eight fiber strands per link, which is more than the customer’s available fiber infrastructure. References:

• Aruba Transceiver and Cable Data Sheet (Aruba Networks)
• Designing Aruba Solutions Study Guide (HPE Press)

To route at the core and extend some of the same VLANs in different buildings, the architect should recommend creating a backplane stack at the aggregation layer and a VSF fabric at the core. A backplane stack is a logical switch that combines multiple physical switches into a single unit, using dedicated stacking cables or ports. A VSF fabric is a virtual switch that combines multiple physical switches into a single unit, using standard Ethernet links. Both technologies provide high availability, scalability, and simplified management for the network12.

By creating a backplane stack at the aggregation layer, the architect can reduce the number of routing interfaces and routing protocols needed at the core layer, as well as simplify the configuration and maintenance of the aggregation switches. By creating a VSF fabric at the core layer, the architect can enable Layer 2 connectivity across different buildings, as well as provide redundancy and load balancing for the core switches. The VSF fabric can use Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation (MC-LAG) to extend the same VLANs to different aggregation stacks, without creating loops or blocking ports3.

The other options are not suitable for the customer’s requirements. Implementing broadcast filtering on switch-to-switch links across all of the buildings would not enable Layer 2 connectivity across different buildings, as it would prevent the propagation of Layer 2 control traffic, such as Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP). Combining all switches in the aggregation layer and core into a single backplane stack would not be feasible, as it would require compatible switches and sufficient stacking ports or cables, as well as create a single point of failure for the entire network. Using VRRP on the core and aggregation switches, with the aggregation switches acting as standby, would not eliminate the routing at the aggregation layer, as it would still require the aggregation switches to participate in the routing process and maintain routing tables.

References:

• ArubaOS-Switch Stacking Guide
• ArubaOS-Switch Virtual Switching Framework Configuration Guide
• Aruba Validated Reference Design: Campus Wired LAN

Aruba Central Managed Portal (MSP) is a cloud-based network management platform that enables service providers to centrally manage and monitor multiple tenant accounts from a single interface1. MSP mode is a multi-tenant operational mode that Aruba Central accounts can be converted into, provided these accounts have subscribed to the Aruba Central app2. MSP mode allows service providers to provision and manage tenant accounts, assign devices to tenant accounts, manage subscription keys and perform other functions such as configuring network profiles and viewing alerts3. MSP mode is suitable for the scenario where a service provider needs to manage multiple customer networks, as it simplifies tenant network operations using capabilities such as zero-touch setup, historical data reporting, PCI compliance monitoring, and troubleshooting2. References:

• 1: MSP Overview - Aruba
• 2: MSP Architecture - Aruba
• 3: Managed Service Portal - Aruba

A customer who has an Instant AP deployment and needs to provide client-to-site VPN access for remote users would benefit from adding a controller to the deployment. A controller can act as a VPN concentrator that terminates the VPN tunnels from the remote clients and provides secure access to the corporate network. The controller can also apply firewall policies and role-based access control to the VPN traffic. An Instant AP deployment alone cannot provide this functionality, as it only supports site-to-site VPN between Instant AP clusters12. The other options do not require a controller, as they can be achieved with an Instant AP deployment. An Instant AP deployment can apply role-based firewall policies using the built-in stateful firewall on each Instant AP3. An Instant AP deployment can also provide a captive portal for guests using the internal orexternal web server options4. An Instant AP deployment can be managed by a cloud-based solution such as Aruba Central, which does not require a controller5. References:

• 1: Understanding IAP-VPN Architecture - Aruba
• 2: Configuring IAP-VPN - Aruba
• 3: Firewall Roles and Policies - Aruba
• 4: Configuring Captive Portal - Aruba
• 5: Managing Instant AP from Aruba Central - Aruba

The frequency of the radio wave is one of the most important factors that determines the antenna performance and compatibility. The antenna must be designed to operate at the same frequency band as the radio, otherwise the impedance mismatch will cause signal loss and reflection. The frequency also affects the size, shape, and radiation pattern of the antenna. For example, a lower frequency requires a larger antenna to achievethe same gain and directivity as a higher frequency antenna. The frequency also determines the available bandwidth and channel spacing for the wireless communication12. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that the antenna is designed for the frequency used by the radio. References:

• 1: Antenna selection guidelines - STMicroelectronics
• 2: Guide to Selecting the Right Antenna - Telco Antennas

The switch needs to support PoE+ for this deployment. PoE+ stands for Power over Ethernet Plus, and it is a technology that allows the switch to provide both data and power to the connected devices over a single Ethernet cable. This eliminates the need for separate power sources or adapters for the devices, and simplifies the installation and management of the network. PoE+ can provide up to 30 watts of power per port,which is sufficient for the Aruba 320 Series APs, which have a maximum power consumption of 20 watts. PoE+ also supports 1 GbE connectivity, which meets the customer’s requirement.

The other options are not relevant for this deployment:

• Option B is incorrect because LACP is not a feature that the switch needs to support for this deployment. LACP stands for Link Aggregation Control Protocol, and it is a protocol that allows multiple physical links to be combined into a single logical link, providing higher bandwidth and redundancy. However, the architect plans to connect each AP with one Ethernet port to the switch, so there is no need for link aggregation in this scenario.
• Option C is incorrect because port channel is not a feature that the switch needs to support for this deployment. Port channel is another term for link aggregation, which is not required for this scenario, as explained above.
• Option D is incorrect because Smart Rate is not a feature that the switch needs to support for this deployment. Smart Rate is a technology that allows the switch to provide multi-gigabit Ethernet speeds (up to 10 GbE) and PoE+ to the connected devices, depending on the cable type and length. However, the customer only wants to support at least 1 GbE connectivity, which can be achieved with PoE+ and CAT6 cable, without the need for Smart Rate.

References:

• Aruba 320 Series Access Points Data Sheet)
• ArubaOS-Switch and ArubaOS-CX Transceiver Guide)
• Aruba Certified Design Professional Official Certification Study Guide (HPE6-A47))

The maximum bandwidth possible between the aggregation and core layers using 8 strands of OM4 Multi-Mode fiber can be up to 200 Gbps1. This is because each strand of OM4 fiber can support up to 25 Gbps of bandwidth, and with 8 strands, the total bandwidth can reach up to 200 Gbps1. However, the actual bandwidth can be influenced by various factors such as the quality of the fiber, the type of transceivers used, and the distance between the aggregation and core layers1.

References:

• What is IP and Ethernet aggregation? - Ciena
• Aruba 5400R zl2 Switch Series Data Sheet
• Aruba 5400R zl2 Switch Series Installation and Getting Started Guide
• ArubaOS-Switch and ArubaOS-CX Transceiver Guide

The architect should recommend the use of Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) in this network because it simplifies the topology and eliminates the need for spanning tree. VSF is a technology that allows multiple Aruba switches to operate as a single logical device, providing high availability, scalability, and simplified management. By using VSF, the architect can reduce the number of links and devices in the network, and avoid the complexity and inefficiency of spanning tree protocol (STP), which is used to prevent loops in a network. VSF also enables faster convergence and recovery in case of link or device failures, as well as load balancing and link aggregation across the switches.

The other options are not valid reasons for using VSF in this network:

• Option A is incorrect because VSF does not enable software-defined network monitoring in conjunction with AirWare. AirWare is a network management platform that provides visibility and control over the entire network, including wired and wireless devices, applications, and users. VSF does not directly affect the functionality of AirWare, nor does it provide any additional features for software-defined network monitoring.
• Option B is incorrect because VSF does not transform switches into virtual extensions of the MCs to simplify MST management. MCs are mobility controllers that provide centralized control and configuration for wireless access points and gateways. VSF does not integrate the switches with the MCs, nor does it affect the MST (Multiple Spanning Tree) protocol, which is an enhancement of STP that allows multiple instances of STP to run on different VLANs.
• Option C is incorrect because VSF does not enable administrators to manage all 18 switches as a single switch. VSF allows the switches to operate as a single logical device, but they still retain their individual identities and configurations. Administrators can use the VSF commander switch as a single point of management for the VSF members, but they still need to access each switch separately for some tasks, such as firmware updates, backups, and restores.

References:

• ArubaOS-Switch and ArubaOS-CX Transceiver Guide)
• ArubaOS-Switch Management and Configuration Guide for WC.16.10)
• ArubaOS-Switch Virtual Switching Framework Configuration Guide for WC.16.10)

Auditoriums are challenging environments for wireless design, as they often have a large number of users and devices in a relatively small area, creating high demand for bandwidth and capacity. To provide adequate RF coverage and performance, auditoriums typically require a high-density AP design, which involves deploying more APs than usual, using directional antennas, reducing transmit power, and selecting non-overlapping channels12. A high-density AP design can also help mitigate interference from other sources, such as Bluetooth devices, which operate in the 2.4 GHz band3. Auditoriums do not necessarily require the use of 80 MHz channels or DFS channels, as these options depend on the availability and regulation of the spectrum, as well as the trade-off between throughput and channel reuse . References:

• 1: High Density Wi-Fi Design Principles - Aruba
• 2: Auditorium | WBDG - Whole Building Design Guide
• 3: Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Coexistence Issues and Solutions for the 2.4 GHz ISM Band - Aruba
• [4]: 802.11ac Channel Planning - Aruba
• [5]: Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) - Aruba

 Aruba AirWare is a network management solution that provides real time statistics and assessment of call quality for Skype for Business UC solution. It integrates with Skype for Business SDN API to monitor and troubleshoot voice and video calls, and optimize network performance and user experience. It also provides visibility into network health, application performance, and user behavior across wired and wireless networks. Aruba Central is a cloud-based network management solution that does not support Skype for Business integration. Aruba Mobility Master (MM) is a network controller that manages Aruba access points and switches, but does not provide call quality statistics or assessment. Aruba ClearPass is a network access control solution that provides secure authentication and policy enforcement, but does not monitor or optimize Skype for Business calls. References: Aruba AirWave Network Management), Aruba AirWave and Microsoft Skype for Business Integration Guide)

One Aruba best practice for this design is to ensure that optimization and suppression of unnecessary multicast is enabled on the MCs. This is because multicast traffic can consume a lot of bandwidth and degrade the wireless performance, especially in a large building with many devices. By enabling optimization and suppression of unnecessary multicast, the MCs can reduce the amount of multicast traffic that is sent to the APs and the wireless clients, and improve the network efficiency and user experience.

Option A is incorrect because extending VLAN 10 to the edge and deploying Aruba APs on it is not a best practice for this design. This is because it creates a large broadcast domain that can increase the network congestion and complexity. It also exposes the VLAN 10 to potential security risks from the edge devices. Option B is incorrect because ensuring that each user role on the MCs is associated with a different VLAN ID is not a best practice for this design. This is because it creates a large number of VLANs that can increase the network overhead and management difficulty. It also limits the flexibility and scalability of the network design. Option C is incorrect because ensuring that the RADIUS server assigns users to different VLANs dynamically is not a best practice for this design. This is because it adds an extra layer of complexity and dependency to the network design. It also requires the RADIUS server to be configured and synchronized with the MCs and the VLANs, which can introduce potential errors and delays. References: Aruba Validated Design: Campus Wireless LAN), ArubaOS 8.7 User Guide)

The solution that the architect should recommend on the 2930M switches to authenticate and control wired employee devices is 802.1X on edge ports and no tunneled node. This solution would provide strong authentication and authorization for the wired devices using certificates, which can be issued and managed by ClearPass. The 802.1X protocol would allow the switches to communicate with ClearPass and enforce user roles and policies based on the device identity and context. The no tunneled node option would allow the wired traffic to be forwarded locally on the access layer switches, as the customer prefers, without tunneling it to the MCs. This option would also reduce the bandwidth consumption and latency on the network core.

The other solutions are not optimal for the customer requirements because they either provide weak authentication or require tunneling the wired traffic to the MCs. MAC-Authon edge ports and no tunneled node would provide weak authentication based on the MAC address of the device, which can be easily spoofed or bypassed. MAC-Auth on edge ports and per-user tunneled node would also provide weak authentication and require tunneling the wired traffic to the MCs, which the customer does not want. 802.1X on edge ports and per-user tunneled node would provide strong authentication but also require tunneling the wired traffic to the MCs, which the customer does not want. References:

• Aruba 2930M Switch Series Data Sheet (Aruba Networks)
• Designing Aruba Solutions Study Guide (HPE Press)

The Aruba 2930F Switch Series is a stackable Layer 3 switch series that provides performance and ease of use for enterprises, small and medium-sized businesses, and branch office networks1. It comes with an enterprise-grade feature set that includes static and RIP routing, IPv6, ACLs, robust security, and QoS1. The 2930F Series supports more options for class-based Quality of Service (QoS) policies than the 2540 Series2. This feature is crucial for a customer who needs a wired network solution that can recognize and prioritize a wide array of different types of traffic, including casual Web browsing, voice, video, SAP Online, and file sharing.

References:

• HPE Aruba Networking 2930F Switch Series
• Why would the architect choose the 2930F rather than the 2540 Switch Series for this customer?

Jitter is the variation in the delay of packets arriving at the destination. It is caused by network congestion, routing changes, or other factors that affect the transmission quality. Jitter can affect the quality of VoIP calls, as it can cause gaps, distortion, or echo in the audio. According to the Aruba Validated Reference Design for Voice and Video over Wi-Fi, the recommended maximum jitter for VoIP calls is 30 ms. Therefore, a jitter of 100 ms would typically cause a poor experience for users.

The other options are incorrect because:

• A. The packet loss is the percentage of packets that are lost or discarded during transmission. Packet loss can affect the quality of VoIP calls, as it can cause missing or corrupted audio. However, according to the Aruba Validated Reference Design for Voice and Video over Wi-Fi, the recommended maximum packet loss for VoIP calls is 1 percent. Therefore, a packet loss of 0.3 percent would not typically cause a poor experience for users.
• B. The throughput is the amount of data that can be transferred per unit of time. Throughput can affect the quality of VoIP calls, as it determines the bandwidth available for the audio. However, according to the Aruba Validated Reference Design for Voice and Video over Wi-Fi, the typical throughput for VoIP calls is 64 Kbps. Therefore, a throughput of 67 Kbps would not typically cause a poor experience for users.
• C. The latency is the delay between the sender and the receiver of packets. Latency can affect the quality of VoIP calls, as it can cause delays or out-of-sync audio. However, according to the Aruba Validated Reference Design for Voice and Video over Wi-Fi, the recommended maximum latency for VoIP calls is 150 ms. Therefore, a latency of 100 ms would not typically cause a poor experience for users.

References:

• Aruba Validated Reference Design: Voice and Video over Wi-Fi - Chapter 2)
• Aruba Certified Design Professional Official Certification Study Guide (HPE6-A47) - Chapter 7)

The minimum acceptable signal for an active site survey depends on the type of applications and the data rates that the users require. For 802.11ac, which operates in the 5 GHz band, Aruba recommends a signal of -65 dBm or better for high-performance applications such as voice and video, and a signal of -72 dBm or better for basic applications such as Web and email1. These values are based on the receiver sensitivity of typical 802.11ac clients and the expected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for different modulation and coding schemes (MCS). A higher SNR means a higher data rate and a better user experience.

Therefore, the architect should look for a signal of -65 dBm in the 5 GHz band to determine the test AP range for 802.11ac, assuming that the users run high-performance applications. A signal of -75 dBm in the 5 GHz band might be too weak to support the desired data rates and quality of service. A signal of -65 dBm or -75 dBm in the 2.4 GHz band is irrelevant for 802.11ac, as it does not operate in that band.

References:

• Aruba Validated Reference Design: 802.11ac Networks
• Best Practices for Monitoring and Troubleshooting 802.11ac Networks

ClearPass Access licenses are required for each unique endpoint that authenticates to ClearPass using any supported protocol, such as 802.1X, MAC authentication, web authentication, or VPN authentication1. ClearPass Onboard licenses are required for each unique endpoint that is provisioned with a certificate using the ClearPass Onboard service2. In this scenario, the customer has 900 employees and up to 30 guests a day, which means there are at most 930 users who need to authenticate to the network. Assuming each user has about two or three devices, the maximum number of devices that need Access licenses is 930 x 3 = 2790, which can be rounded up to 3000. The customer also wants to use certificates to authenticate user devices, which means they need Onboard licenses as well. However, the customer only issues laptops to the employees, which means only 900 devices need Onboard licenses. Therefore, the architect should include 3000 Access licenses and 1000 Onboard licenses in the proposal. References:

• 1: ClearPass Licensing Guide - Aruba
• 2: ClearPass Onboard Data Sheet - Aruba