iSQI TMMi-P_Syll2020 Dumps

Each statement about TMMi level 2 in an Agile context requires careful consideration within the framework:

(a): False. While Agile projects indeed use metrics like Velocity, TMMi requires tracking end-results such as escaped defects. Both team performance and outcomes, including defect-related metrics, aresignificant. Test performance indicators at TMMi level 2 in an Agile context should not solely focus on team performance metrics .

(b): True. The product risk assessment process in Agile projects typically adopts a more lightweight approach compared to traditional sequential lifecycle models. Agile teams often conduct risk assessments in a more collaborative and iterative manner .

(c): False. In Agile, monitoring and controlling processes are still critical to ensure goals and quality targets are met, even if the methodology allows for flexibility and adaptation .

(d): False. Traceability is still relevant in Agile, although it may be implemented differently. Agile methodologies such as Scrum do not eliminate the need for traceability between requirements, test conditions, and tests, which is an essential part of TMMi process areas .

(e): True. Agile allows for flexibility in defining the test environment closer to the execution phase, enabling changes that reflect evolving requirements and design decisions .

Thus, the correct combination isA: Statements (a) and (e) are true, while statements (b), (c), and (d) are false​ .

A. Required component (II): Must be achieved. These are specific and generic goals that are mandatory for reaching a particular maturity level.

B. Expected component (III): Will typically be implemented. Expected components include specific and generic practices, which provide guidance on how to achieve required goals.

C. Informative component (I): Supports the understanding. Informative components provide details that help organisations understand and implement the required and expected components effectively, such as sub-practices and example work products.

For safety-critical systems, reliability testing is a key concern. The identified shortcoming relates to the lack of formal techniques and approaches for reliability testing. TheNon-Functional Testingprocess area, at TMMi Level 3, addresses testing non-functional aspects like reliability, performance, and usability. This process area would need specific attention as it provides a structured approach to assess non-functional risks, define testing techniques, and execute tests to verify the reliability of the product, which is critical for medical systems.

Informal assessments, as described in the TMMi framework, are often quicker and cheaper as they do not require the extensive corroboration of evidence that formal assessments do. One key characteristic of informal assessments is that they may rely solely on interviews, without using other forms of corroboration such as documentation reviews or observations. These informal assessments provide an indicative view of the organization's maturity level but do not result in formal certification​

Sub-practices are informative components within the TMMi model. Informative components provide additional details or guidance to help organisations understand how to approach the required and expected components. Sub-practices are not mandatory, but they offer ideas or methods that can assist with the implementation of specific practices. Other examples of informative components include example work products, notes, and references.

The specific goals of the "Test Monitoring and Control" process area at TMMi Level 2 focus on monitoring both test progress and product quality. One of the key practices is managing and monitoringtest incidents to closure(Specific Practice 3.3). The goal is to ensure that any test-related issues are tracked, addressed, and resolved. This process area emphasises identifying corrective actions when deviations occur and ensuring that they are brought to closure.

Monitoring test incidents helps provide insight into the test status and product quality while ensuring that all critical incidents are resolved effectively, thus aligning with the overall objective of controlling the testing process​​.

The statement thatall defects should be analyzedto prevent as many defects as possible isFALSE. In theDefect Preventionprocess area atTMMi Level 5, only asubset of defects—those that are recurring or considered to be of significant impact—are analyzed. Analyzing all defects would be inefficient and not always necessary. Instead, a targeted approach is used to identifycommon causesof defects and implement actions to prevent their recurrence.

TMMi References:

TheDefect Preventionprocess area is based on the analysis of a subset of defects to find and eliminate common causes​​.

For aformal TMMi assessment, bothstaff interviews and document studyare required to collect sufficient evidence. The assessment must adhere to the TMMi Assessment Method Accreditation Requirements (TAMAR), which state that formal assessments require thecorroboration of interview data with documentary evidence (artifacts). These can include documents, templates, or screenshots, ensuring that the evaluation is robust, repeatable, and auditable​​.

As part of theProduct Quality Evaluationprocess area (4.2), the specific goal"Project Goals for Product Quality and their Priorities are Established"includes the practice ofidentifying product quality needs. This involves understanding and defining what quality means for the product, determining quality characteristics (such as reliability, usability, etc.), and establishing priorities for these characteristics based on project goals.

Other practices such asestablishing test process measuresandmeasuring product quality quantitativelycome later in the lifecycle or are part of other specific goals.

TMMi References:

InProduct Quality EvaluationatTMMi Level 4, identifying product quality needs is critical for setting up measurable and prioritized goals for product quality​​.

In Agile environments, TMMi is often used to complement the Agile methodology by providing structured guidance on critical testing practices that may be overlooked. While Agile focuses on flexibility and responsiveness, TMMi can remind organisations of essential practices that ensure thorough testing, such as formal reviews or defect management. The TMMi framework does not impose strict processes but offers structured support for critical test process improvements that align with Agile principles.

In the Test Design and Execution process area of TMMi Level 2, there are four specific goals. The relevant goals for this question are SG 2 (Perform Test Implementation) and SG 3 (Perform Test Execution):

SG 2 Perform Test Implementationincludes practices such as developing and prioritising test procedures and creating specific test data. Therefore, the specific practice that aligns with this goal is"Create specific test data" (III).

SG 3 Perform Test Executioninvolves executing the tests and logging the outcomes. One of the specific practices here is"Write test log" (II), which documents the execution data in a structured manner.

Thus, the correct pair is SG 2 withIII (Create specific test data)and SG 3 withII (Write test log)​​.

An indirect benefit of a test improvement programme is improved staff motivation. While direct benefits, such as shortened lead time or higher defect detection rates, are focused on measurable improvements, indirect benefits include enhanced morale and engagement of the staff involved. A well-structured test improvement programme can lead to better recognition of the testing function within the organisation, leading to increased satisfaction and motivation among testing professionals.

TheTMMi process area Test Planningis indeed supported by severalCMMI process areas, includingProject Planning,Requirements Management, andRisk Management. These CMMI areas provide foundational support for ensuring that the test planning process incorporates adequate project management, requirement traceability, and risk identification, all of which are critical for effective testing.

Specific Goal 2 of the CMMI Validation process arearelates to validation activities, not peer reviews, and therefore does not support the TMMi Peer Reviews process area.

Causal Analysis and Resolutionis linked toDefect Preventionin TMMi, not Quality Control.

Performance Managementdoes not directly support the Non-Functional Testing process area in TMMi.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi Test Planningprocess area is supported by relevant CMMI process areas, such asProject Planning, which helps in aligning project goals with test planning activities​​.

The specific practice"Establish the Organization’s Test Process Database"is found within theTest Lifecycle and Integrationprocess area, which is part ofTMMi Level 3. This process area aims to establish standardized test processes across the organization, including maintaining atest process databasethat holds process-related information and data for reuse and continuous improvement.

TMMi References:

TheTest Lifecycle and Integrationprocess area is responsible for establishing and maintaining organizational test process assets, including the test process database​​.

In the TMMi framework, aSpecific Goalis unique to a particular process area and represents the essential outcomes that must be achieved for that process area. In contrast, aGeneric Goalapplies across multiple process areas and ensures that the processes are institutionalised, managed, and aligned with broader organisational objectives. Generic Goals help maintain consistency and effectiveness of processes across the organisation, while Specific Goals focus on the particular needs of an individual process area.

Advanced Reviewsis aTMMi Level 4process area. AtTMMi Level 4 (Measured), organizations focus on making testing aquantifiable process, using metrics and measurements to evaluate and improve product quality and the testing process.Advanced Reviewsinvolve more structured andformalized review processes that are integrated with the dynamic testing approach to measure and improve product quality earlier in the lifecycle.

TheTest Policy and Strategyis part ofLevel 2.

Defect Preventionis part ofLevel 5.

Test Lifecycle and Integrationis part ofLevel 3.

TMMi References:

TMMi definesAdvanced Reviewsas a Level 4 process area aimed at improving product quality through more rigorous and measurable review processes​​.

The generic practice"Establish a defined process"addresses the need to tailor a managed process from the organization’s set of standard processes. This practice is part ofGeneric Goal 3 (GG 3), which aims to ensure that processes are standardized and defined across the organization. By tailoring processes based on established guidelines, organizations can create specific implementations that fit their projects while maintaining consistency and control across the organization.

TMMi References:

In TMMi, establishing a defined process involves tailoring standard processes to suit specific project needs, ensuring the institutionalization of best practices across projects​​.

Agile organisations often focus on rapid iterations and minimal documentation, which can lead to the omission or underuse of structured testing practices.TMMiserves as a valuable guide for Agile teams by highlightingcritical testing practicesthat might be overlooked, ensuring that essential quality processes such as risk analysis, peer reviews, and test planning are not neglected​​​.

This reminder ensures that teams maintain a disciplined approach to testing while still benefiting from Agile flexibility.

Aspecific practiceis an expected component of the TMMi model. Expected components describe what an organisation will typically implement to achieve required components, such as specific and generic goals. Specific practices are activities that are crucial for achieving the specific goals of a process area, and they are evaluated during assessments to determine whether the goals have been met.

Planning pokeris an Agile technique commonly used to estimate effort, and it can be adapted for use in theTest Planningprocess area to help estimate test efforts (SG3: Establish Test Estimates). This collaborative technique brings stakeholders together to estimate the effort required for tasks by assigning numerical values in a consensus-driven manner. It is particularly effective in Agile environments where estimation is iterative and frequently updated based on evolving project needs​.

The description provided—where testing ismulti-level, with distinct test levels (component, integration, system, and acceptance), and where the processes of testing and debugging are differentiated—applies toTMMi Level 2 (Managed). At this maturity level, testing is separated from debugging, and there are formalized processes for different testing levels. A company-wide or program-wide test strategy is established, and specific testing objectives are defined for each test level.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi Level 2framework defines structured testing withmultiple levels, including component, integration, system, and acceptance testing, as well as the separation of testing and debugging​​.

TheActing phaseof a test improvement cycle focuses on executing the planned improvements. Key activities during this phase includecreating solutionsto address identified problems,planning actionsto implement those solutions, andpiloting solutionsbefore full-scale deployment. Thesesteps ensure that the improvements are well-defined, tested in a controlled environment, and refined before being fully implemented across the organisation.

This statement is false because the CMMI does not have defined levels specifically for testing maturity. The CMMI model is more general and focuseson overall process improvement across various disciplines, including but not limited to testing. CMMI includes practices like verification and validation but does not specifically address a structured path to testing maturity, unlike TMMi, which defines specific levels for testing process maturity. Therefore, statement D is incorrect.

For theTest Policy and Strategyprocess area, with a40% achievement, the appropriate compliance rating is"Partly achieved". According to TMMi, a process area is rated as "partly achieved" when a portion of the practices has been implemented, but significant improvements are still needed​​​.

The correct order of TMMi maturity levels fromlow to highis:

Managed(Level 2): Testing becomes a managed and separate process from debugging, with formal strategies and plans.

Defined(Level 3): Testing is fully integrated into the development lifecycle, with standardized processes across projects.

Measured(Level 4): Testing processes are measured quantitatively, and product quality is evaluated with formal metrics.

This sequence reflects the increasing maturity and sophistication of an organization's testing processes as they progress through the levels.

TMMi References:

The TMMi maturity levels follow the order ofManaged (Level 2),Defined (Level 3), andMeasured (Level 4)​​.

TheAdvanced Reviewsprocess area, which is part ofTMMi Level 4, is concerned with measuring product quality early in the lifecycle. It aims to enhance thetest strategyandtest approachby aligningstatic testing(reviews and inspections) withdynamic testing(execution of test cases). The results and data from static testing are used to optimize the dynamic testing approach, making the overall testing process more efficient and effective.

TMMi References:

Advanced Reviewsat TMMi Level 4 focuses on integrating static and dynamic testing approaches to optimize test strategy and product quality evaluation​​.

In theActing phaseof the IDEAL improvement model, the focus is on implementing the changes that were identified and planned in the earlier phases. The two main activities in this phase areCreate SolutionandImplement Solution. This phase generally consumes the most effort, as creating and deploying solutions to improve the processes are resource-intensive activities. These activities align with option D, making it the correct answer .

The statement thatSpecific Goal 1of theTest Measurement (4.1)process area covers the communication of test measurement results after analysis isFALSE. Specific Goal 1 focuses on aligningtest measurement and analysis activities, which involves setting measurement objectives, specifying the measures to be taken, and establishing procedures for data collection, storage, and analysis. However, the communication of results comes underSpecific Goal 2, which deals with the analysis and reporting of test measurement results.

TMMi References:

Test MeasurementatTMMi Level 4includes defining measures, data collection, and storage as part of aligning test measurement and analysis activities, while communicating results is part of a different goal​​.

In the context of TMMi and test improvement programs, anindirect benefitrefers to outcomes that are not directly tied to the technical improvement of the testing process but affect the overall success of the organization in less measurable ways.

Increased personnel motivationis considered anindirect benefitof a test improvement program because it boosts team morale and engagement, leading to better productivity in the long run. This is different from direct benefits such asimprovements in defect detectionortest execution lead-time, which are quantifiable metrics directly related to the testing process.

TMMi References:

Direct benefitssuch as defect detection rates and test execution speed are frequently mentioned in TMMi as measurable outcomes from process improvement efforts.

Indirect benefits, like improved motivation, are acknowledged as part of the cultural and organizational improvements that can come from a well-executed test improvement strategy​​.

ISO/IEC 15504, which is known for its process assessment model, was not one of the sources used during the development of the TMMi model. The TMMi model was developed using inputs from sources such as the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), international testing standards (like those from ISO and IEEE), and industry testing best practices surveys. While the ISO/IEC 15504 model has relevance to general process assessments, it was not specifically referenced in the creation of the TMMi.

In theInitiating phaseof a test improvement cycle, one of the key activities is toCharter Infrastructure. This activity involves setting up the structure needed to support the improvement effort, such as establishing a project board and defining responsibilities. This phase focuses on creating the foundational support for the test improvement initiative.

In a staged model like TMMi, an organisation follows a predefined improvement path that includes a set of process areas organised by maturity levels. Each level builds upon the previous one, and the organisation progresses in a step-by-step manner through these maturity levels to improve its processes. The staged model is well-structured and prescriptive, offering a clear improvement roadmap for the organisation.

In theDefect Preventionprocess area at TMMi Level 5, one of the key specific goals (SG2) is to prioritise and define actions to systematically eliminate the root causes of defects. This involves proposing solutions to address common defect causes that have been identified during causal analysis. These solutions aim to prevent defects from reoccurring across the development lifecycle.