Juniper JN0-636 Dumps

• The packet is processed as host inbound traffic because the traceoptions output shows that the destination IP address 10.10.10.1 belongs to the SRX device itself, which is configured with the ge-0/0/1.0 interface. The traceoptions output also shows the flag flow_host_inbound, which indicates that the packet is destined to the device.
• The packet matches the default security policy because the traceoptions output shows that the policy name is default-deny, which is the implicit system-default security policy that denies all packets. The traceoptions output also shows the flag flow_policy_deny, which indicates that the packet is denied by the policy.

References:

• traceoptions (Security NAT) | Junos OS | Juniper Networks
• [SRX] How to interpret Flow TraceOptions output for NAT troubleshooting
• Default Security Policies | Junos OS | Juniper Networks

To control access to network resources based on the identity of an authenticated device on the SRX Series firewalls, you need to perform the following steps:

• A. Configure an end-user-profile that characterizes a device or set of devices. An end-user-profile is a device identity profile that contains a collection of attributes that are characteristics of a specific group of devices, or of a specific device, depending on the attributes configured in the profile. The end-user-profile must contain a domain name and at least one value in each attribute. The attributes include device-identity, device-category, device-vendor, device-type, device-os, and device-os-version1. You can configure an end-user-profile by using the Junos Space Security Director or the CLI2.
• C. Reference the end-user-profile in the security policy. A security policy is a rule that defines the action to be taken for the traffic that matches the specified criteria, such as source and destination addresses, zones, protocols, ports, and applications. You can reference the end-user-profile in the source-end-user-profile field of the security policy to identify the traffic source based on the device from which the traffic issued. The SRX Series device matches the IP address of the device to the end-user-profile and applies the security policy accordingly3. You can reference the end-user-profile in the security policy by using the Junos Space Security Director or the CLI4.
• E. Configure the authentication source to be used to authenticate the device. An authentication source is a system that provides the device identity information to the SRX Series device. The authentication source can be Microsoft Windows Active Directory or a third-party network access control (NAC) system. You need to configure the authentication source to be used to authenticate the device and to send the device identity information to the SRX Series device. The SRX Series device stores the device identity information in the device identity authentication table5. You can configure the authentication source by using the Junos Space Security Director or the CLI6.

The other options are incorrect because:

• B. Referencing the end-user-profile in the security zone is not a valid step to control access to network resources based on the identity of an authenticated device. A security zone is a logical grouping of interfaces that have similar security requirements. You can reference the user role in the security zone to identify the user who is accessing the network resources, but not the end-user-profile7.
• D. Applying the end-user-profile at the interface connecting the devices is also not a valid step to control access to network resources based on the identity of an authenticated device. You cannot apply the end-user-profile at the interface level, but only at the security policy level. The end-user-profile is not a firewall filter or a security policy, but a device identity profile that is referenced in the security policy1.

References:

• End User Profile Overview
• Creating an End User Profile
• source-end-user-profile
• Creating Firewall Policy Rules
• Understanding the Device Identity Authentication Table and Its Entries
• Configuring the Authentication Source for Device Identity
• user-role

According to the Juniper documentation, the infected host score is a global setting that determines the minimum threat level required for a host to be considered infected and blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. The infected host score can be configured from 1 to 10, where 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest. The default infected host score is 5, which means that any host with a threat level of 5 or higher will be automatically blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. However, the infected host score can be changed to a higher value, such as 6 or 7, to reduce the number of false positives and allow more traffic to pass through. In the exhibit, the host has a threat level of 5, which indicates that it is infected with malware and has attempted to contact command-and-control servers. However, some of the events have not been automatically mitigated, which means that the host has not been blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. A possible reason for this behavior is that the infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5, such as 6 or 7, which means that the host does not meet the minimum threshold for blocking. Therefore, the correct answer is C. The infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5. References: [Configuring the Infected Host Score] 1, [Compromised Hosts: More Information] 2

1: 2:

To troubleshoot the traffic problem using the match criteria, you need to use the show security match-policies CLI command. The other options are incorrect because:

• A. The show security policy-report CLI command displays the policy report, which is a summary of the policy usage statistics, such as the number of sessions, bytes, and packets that match each policy. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy1.
• B. The show security application-tracking counters CLI command displays the application tracking counters, which are the statistics of the application usage, such as the number of sessions, bytes, and packets that match each application. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy2.
• D. The request security policies check CLI command checks the validity and consistency of the security policies, such as the syntax, the references, and the conflicts. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy3.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. You need to use the show security match-policies CLI command to troubleshoot the traffic problem using the match criteria. The show security match-policies CLI command displays the policies that match the specified criteria, such as the source and destination addresses, the zones, the protocols, and the ports. It also shows the action and the hit count of each matching policy. You can use this command to verify if the traffic is matching the expected policy or not, and if not, what policy is blocking or rejecting the traffic4

The two valid modes for the Juniper ATP Appliance are all-in-one and core. The all-in-one mode is a single appliance that performs both the collector and the core functions. The collector function collects traffic from the network and sends it to the core function for analysis and detection. The core function performs the threat detection, mitigation, and analytics. The all-in-one mode is suitable for small to medium-sized networks that do not require high scalability or performance. The core mode is a dedicated appliance that performs only the core function. The core mode is used in conjunction with one or more collector appliances that collect traffic from the network and send it to the core appliance for analysis and detection. The core mode is suitable for large-scale networks that require high scalability and performance. References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

According to the Juniper documentation, Juniper ATP Cloud supports the following modes:

• Layer 3 mode: In this mode, the SRX Series device acts as a Layer 3 gateway and routes traffic between different subnets. The SRX Series device performs NAT and security policy enforcement on the traffic and sends a copy of the traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis. This mode is suitable for networks that have multiple subnets and require NAT and firewall functions1
• Transparent mode: In this mode, the SRX Series device acts as a Layer 2 bridge and forwards traffic between the same subnet. The SRX Series device does not perform NAT or security policy enforcement on the traffic, but sends a copy of the traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis. This mode is suitable for networks that have a single subnet and do not require NAT or firewall functions1

The other two modes, global mode and private mode, are not supported by Juniper ATP Cloud. Global mode is a configuration option for Juniper ATP Appliance, which is an on-premises solution that provides threat detection and prevention. Private mode is a configuration option for Juniper ATP Private Cloud, which is a cloud-based solution that provides threat detection and prevention within a private network23

References:

1: Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Cloud | ATP Cloud | Juniper Networks 2: Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance | ATP Appliance | Juniper Networks 3: [Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Private Cloud | ATP Private Cloud | Juniper Networks]

The suspicious_Endpoints feed is a dynamic address group that is created by Juniper ATP Cloud based on the IoT device discovery and policy enforcement feature. This feature allows the SRX Series device to send IoT traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis and classification. Juniper ATP Cloud then creates a threat feed that contains the IP addresses of the suspicious IoT devices and sends it back to the SRX Series device. The SRX Series device can then use this feed to create and enforce security policies for the IoT traffic. The suspicious_Endpoints feed is usable by any SRX Series device that is a part of the same realm as SRX-1, because the feed is shared among the devices that belong to the same Juniper ATP Cloud realm. Juniper ATP Cloud automatically creates the suspicious_Endpoints feed after you commit the security policy that references the feed, because the feed is dynamically generated based on the IoT traffic analysis. You do not need to manually create the feed in the Juniper ATP Cloud interface. References:

• Example- Configure IoT Device Discovery and Policy Enforcement
• Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Cloud Policy Overview

The flow-session resource is needed in order to ensure adequate and secure communication between the two logical systems.

• The flow-session resource must be defined in the security profile for the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system is responsible for forwarding traffic between other logical systems. The flow-session resource determines the maximum number of sessions that the interconnect logical system can create and maintain. If the flow-session resource is not allocated or is insufficient, the interconnect logical system might drop packets or fail to establish sessions1.
• The NAT resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system does not perform any NAT operations on the traffic. The NAT resources are only relevant for the logical systems that need to translate the source or destination IP addresses or ports of the traffic1.
• No resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system is incorrect because the interconnect logical system still requires some resources to function properly, such as the flow-session resource. The interconnect logical system cannot operate without any resources allocated to it1.
• The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic that will flow between the logical systems is partially correct, but not the best answer. The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic and the type of traffic that will flow between the logical systems. For example, the flow-session resource depends on the number and duration of sessions, the security-log-stream-number resource depends on the number and size of logs, and the NAT resource depends on the number and type of NAT rules1.

References:

• Security Profiles for Logical Systems | Junos OS | Juniper Networks

The purpose of the Switch Microservice of Policy Enforcer is to isolate infected hosts. The Switch Microservice is a component of Policy Enforcer that runs on EX Series and QFX Series switches. It communicates with Policy Enforcer and Juniper ATP Cloud to receive threat intelligence and quarantine commands. When an infected host is detected by Juniper ATP Cloud, Policy Enforcer sends a command to the Switch Microservice to isolate the host by applying an access control list (ACL) on the switch port where the host is connected. The ACL blocks all traffic from or to the host except for the traffic that is required for remediation. The Switch Microservice also tracks the MAC address of the infected host and updates Policy Enforcer if the host moves to a different switch port or a different switch. This way, the Switch Microservice ensures that the infected host is isolated until it is remediated and no longer poses a threat to the network. References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

To solve the problem of the operator user being unable to save configuration files to a USB stick that is plugged into SRX, you need to add the system-control permission flag to the operations class. The other options are incorrect because:

• A. Adding the floppy permission flag to the operations class is not sufficient or necessary to save configuration files to a USB stick. The floppy permission flag allows the user to access the floppy drive, but not the USB drive. The USB drive is accessed by the system permission flag, which is already included in the operations class1.
• C. Adding the interface-control permission flag to the operations class is also not sufficient or necessary to save configuration files to a USB stick. The interface-control permission flag allows the user to configure and monitor interfaces, but not to save configuration files. The configuration permission flag, which is also already included in the operations class, allows the user to save configuration files1.
• D. Adding the system permission flag to the operations class is redundant and ineffective to save configuration files to a USB stick. The system permission flag allows the user to access the system directory, which includes the USB drive. However, the operations class already has the system permission flag by default1. The problem is not the lack of system permission, but the lack of system-control permission.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. You need to add the system-control permission flag to the operations class to solve the problem. The system-control permission flag allows the user to perform system-level operations, such as rebooting, halting, or snapshotting the device1. These operations are required to mount, unmount, and copy files to and from the USB drive2. To add the system-control permission flag to the operations class, you need to perform the following steps:

• Enter the configuration mode: user@host> configure
• Navigate to the system login class hierarchy: user@host# edit system login class operations
• Add the system-control permission flag: user@host# set permissions system-control
• Commit the changes: user@host# commit

References:

• login (System)
• How to mount a USB drive on EX/SRX/MX/QFX Series platforms to import/export files

The result of adding the count action to a security policy can be seen in the show security policies detail command output. The count action is a feature that allows you to enable statistics collection for sessions that enter the device for a given policy, and for the number of packets and bytes that pass through the device in both directions for a given policy. The count action can help you to monitor the traffic that matches a security policy and to troubleshoot security policy issues. The show security policies detail command displays the detailed information about the security policies configured on the device, including the count statistics. The output shows the number of packets and bytes that have been processed by the policy in both directions, as well as the number of sessions that have been created by the policy. You can use this command to verify that the count action is working as expected and to see the traffic volume and session count for each policy. References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

The exhibit shows the configuration of filter-based forwarding on an SRX Series device. Filter-based forwarding is a feature that allows the device to use firewall filters to direct traffic to different routing instances based on the match criteria. In this scenario, the device has two routing instances - ISP-1 and ISP-2 - and two firewall filters - FBF and FBF-ISP-1. The FBF filter is applied to the ge-0/0/1 interface as an input filter. The FBF filter has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The ISP-1 routing instance has a static route to the next hop 172.20.0.2. The FBF-ISP-1 filter is applied to the ge-0/0/0 interface as an output filter. The FBF-ISP-1 filter has one term that matches the traffic to the 172.20.0.2 next hop and sets the forwarding class to expedited-forwarding.

The problem in this scenario is that the traffic from the other network (172.25.1.0/24) is not being forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor. This is because the FBF filter does not have a term that accepts the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. The FBF filter only has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network does not match this term and is therefore discarded by the implicit deny action at the end of the filter. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network should be forwarded to the ISP-2 routing instance, which has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2.

To solve this problem, you must add another term to the FBF filter to accept the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. This term should have the action accept, which means that the traffic will be forwarded according to the routing table of the master routing instance. The master routing instance has a static default route to the ISP-2 routing instance, which in turn has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2. By adding this term, the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network will be forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor as expected.

The configuration of the new term in the FBF filter could look something like this:

[edit firewall family inet filter FBF] term 2 { from { source-address { 172.25.1.0/24; } } then { accept; } }

References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

The command "show security dynamic-address category-name DS hield" will show the IP addresses that are part of the DS hield category. By filtering the output of this command with the "match 203.0.113.5" command, you can determine if the IP address 203.0.113.5 is part of the DS hield feed. This command will check the feeds that are configured on SRX Series device and are associated to juniper ATP Cloud.

Juniper ATP Cloud is a cloud-based service that provides advanced threat prevention and detection for SRX Series devices. To enroll an SRX Series device with Juniper ATP Cloud, you need to have a valid license and authorization code, and you need to run a Junos OS op script on the device. The op script performs the following tasks:

• Downloads and installs certificate authority (CA) licenses onto your SRX Series device.
• Creates local certificates and enrolls them with the cloud server.
• Performs basic Juniper ATP Cloud configuration on the SRX Series device.
• Establishes a secure connection to the cloud server.

You can run the op script either by copying the CLI command from the Juniper ATP Cloud Web Portal and running it on the device, or by using the enroll command on the device. The op script is the only way to enroll an SRX Series device with Juniper ATP Cloud. You cannot enroll the device manually or by using other methods.

The other statements in the question are incorrect for the following reasons:

• If a device is already enrolled in a realm and you enroll it in a new realm, none of the device data or configuration information is propagated to the new realm. This includes history, infected hosts feeds, logging, API tokens, and administrator accounts. You can view and change the realm association of a device from the Realm Management page in the Juniper ATP Cloud Web Portal.
• The only way to enroll an SRX Series device is not to interact with the Juniper ATP Cloud Web Portal. You can also use the enroll command on the device, which performs all the necessary enrollment steps without requiring you to access the Web Portal.
• When the license expires, the SRX Series device is not disenrolled from Juniper ATP Cloud without a grace period. The device enters a grace period of 30 days, during which it can still send files to the cloud for inspection and receive threat intelligence feeds. After the grace period, the device is disenrolled and stops communicating with the cloud.

References:

• How to Enroll Your SRX Series Firewalls in Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) Cloud Using Policy Enforcer
• Enroll an SRX Series Firewall using Juniper ATP Cloud Web Portal
• ATP Cloud | Step 2: Up and Running
• Enroll an SRX Series Firewall Using the CLI

According to the exhibit, which is a security flow trace on an SRX Series device, the following statements are true:

• The packet’s destination is to an interface on the SRX Series device. This is indicated by the line packet dropped for self but not interested, which means that the packet is destined to the SRX device itself, but the device does not have the corresponding service configured in the host-inbound-traffic stanza for the interface1.
• The packet originated within the Trust zone. This is indicated by the line zone name: Trust, which shows that the packet belongs to the Trust zone. The Trust zone is typically the zone where the internal network is connected to the SRX device2.
• The packet is dropped before making an SSH connection. This is indicated by the line flow_first_inline_processing: pak(0x4a9c0d0), which shows that the packet is the first packet in the session and is processed by the firewall. The packet is dropped because it does not match any security policy or host-inbound-traffic rule1. The packet is trying to make an SSH connection, which uses TCP port 22, as shown by the line source port: 22.

The following statements are false:

• The packet’s destination is to a server in the DMZ zone. There is no indication of the DMZ zone in the trace output. The DMZ zone is typically the zone where the external servers are connected to the SRX device2.
• The packet is allowed to make an SSH connection. The packet is not allowed to make an SSH connection, as explained above.

References: 1: SRX Getting Started - Troubleshoot Security Policy 2: SRX Getting Started - Configure Security Zones

The Juniper ATP Appliance platform collects, inspects and analyzes advanced and stealthy web, file, and email-based threats that exploit and infiltrate client browsers, operating systems, emails and applications. Juniper ATP Appliance’s detection of malicious attacks generates incident and event details that can be sent to connected SIEM platforms in CEF, LEEF or Syslog formats1. CEF (Common Event Format) is an open log management standard that improves the interoperability of security-related information from different vendors2. Juniper ATP Appliance supports CEF format for sending events and system audit notifications to SIEM servers. You can configure the CEF format in the Juniper ATP Appliance Central Manager WebUI Config > Notifications > SIEM Settings1. Therefore, the correct answer is C. CEF is a supported logging output format for Juniper ATP Appliance. The other options are incorrect because:

• A. WELF (WebTrends Enhanced Log Format) is a proprietary log format developed by WebTrends Corporation for web analytics3. Juniper ATP Appliance does not support WELF format for SIEM integration.
• B. JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format that is easy for humans and machines to read and write4. Juniper ATP Appliance supports JSON format for HTTP API results, but not for SIEM notifications1.
• D. Binary is a numeric system that uses only two digits: 0 and 1. Binary is not a logging output format for Juniper ATP Appliance or any SIEM platform.

References:

• SIEM Syslog, LEEF and CEF Logging
• Common Event Format Configuration Guide
• WebTrends Enhanced Log Format
• JSON

Certificate RenewalThe renewal of certificates is much the same as initial certificate enrollment except you are just replacing an old certificate(about to expire) on the VPN device with a new certificate. As with the initial certificate request, only manual renewal issupported. SCEP can be used to re-enroll local certificates automatically before they expire. Refer to Appendix D for moredetails.

According to the Juniper documentation, reflexive NAT is a type of source NAT that allows an internal host to communicate with an external host using a single public IP address and port. The reflexive NAT session is created when the internal host initiates the traffic to the external host, and the session is deleted when the traffic stops. The reflexive NAT session is bidirectional, meaning that the external host can send traffic back to the internal host using the same public IP address and port that the internal host used to reach the external host. However, the external host cannot initiate a new session to the internal host using the same public IP address and port, unless the internal host has already established a session with the external host. Therefore, only the Internet host that the internal host originally communicated with can initiate traffic to reach the internal host using the 203.0.113.1 address, a random source port, and destination port 54311. References: [Configuring Reflexive NAT]

According to the security flow trace shown in the exhibit, which is a snippet of a packet capture on an SRX Series device, the two statements that are correct are:

• This packet arrived on interface ge-0/0/4.0. This is indicated by the line In: 10.0.1.129/22 -> 10.0.1.129/3382;1,0x0, which shows that the ingress interface of the packet is ge-0/0/4.0, as the interface name is prefixed to the source and destination IP addresses and ports of the packet1.
• An existing session is found in the table. This is indicated by the line Found: session id 0x12. sess tok 28685, which shows that the packet matches an existing session in the session table with the session ID 0x12 and the session token 286852.

The following statements are incorrect or not supported by the output:

• Destination NAT occurs. This is not supported by the output, as there is no indication of destination NAT being applied to the packet. The destination IP address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, which is the same as the destination IP address of the original packet. If destination NAT was applied, the destination IP address of the packet would be different from the destination IP address of the original packet.
• The capture is a packet from the source address 172.20.101.10 destined to 10.0.1.129. This is false, as the output shows that the source address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, not 172.20.101.10. The source IP address of the packet is prefixed to the ingress interface name ge-0/0/4.0.

References: 1: Understanding Security Flow Trace 2: show security flow session - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks

The security trace options configuration shown in the exhibit is committed to your SRX series firewall. The following statements are correct in this scenario:

• B. Once the trace has generated 10 log files, older logs will be overwritten. The files option in the traceoptions statement specifies the maximum number of trace files to keep. When a trace file reaches its maximum size, it is renamed with a numeric suffix, such as kmd.0, kmd.1, and so on, until the maximum number of files is reached. Then the oldest trace file is overwritten by the newest one. In this case, the files option is set to 10, which means that the trace will generate 10 log files and then overwrite the older ones1.
• D. The file debugger will be readable only by the user who committed this configuration. The file option in the traceoptions statement specifies the name of the trace file and the permissions for the file. The permissions can be either world-readable or owner-readable. In this case, the file option is set to debugger owner-readable, which means that the trace file will be named debugger and will be readable only by the user who committed the configuration1.

The other statements are incorrect because:

• A. The file debugger will not be readable by all users, but only by the user who committed this configuration, as explained above.
• C. The trace will not halt after generating 10 log files, but will continue to overwrite the older ones, as explained above.

References:

• traceoptions (Security)

According to the security flow trace in the exhibit, the packets are dropped for self but not interested. This means that the SRX device is receiving packets destined to itself, but it does not have the corresponding service configured in the host-inbound-traffic stanza for the interface1. In this case, the service is BGP, which uses TCP port 179. Therefore, the correct action to solve the problem on the SRX device is to add BGP to the allowed host-inbound-traffic for the interface. This can be done by using the following command:

set security zones security-zone interfaces host-inbound-traffic system-services bgp

This command will allow the SRX device to accept BGP packets on the specified interface and zone. Alternatively, the command can be applied to all interfaces in a zone by using the all-interfaces option2.

References: 1: SRX Getting Started - Troubleshoot Security Policy 2: Configuring System Services Allowed for Host Inbound Traffic

To find an infected host and where the attack came from using the Juniper ATP Cloud, you need to use the Hosts and Threat Sources monitor workspaces. The other options are incorrect because:

• B. The File Scanning monitor workspace shows the files that have been scanned by the Juniper ATP Cloud and their verdicts (clean, malicious, or unknown). It does not show the infected hosts or the attack sources1.
• D. The Encrypted Traffic monitor workspace shows the encrypted traffic that has been decrypted by the Juniper ATP Cloud and the certificates that have been used. It does not show the infected hosts or the attack sources2.

Therefore, the correct answer is A and C. You need to use the Hosts and Threat Sources monitor workspaces to find an infected host and where the attack came from using the Juniper ATP Cloud. To do so, you need to perform the following steps:

• For Hosts, you need to access the Hosts monitor workspace in the Juniper ATP Cloud WebUI by selecting Monitor > Hosts. You can see the list of hosts that have been detected by the Juniper ATP Cloud and their risk scores, infection levels, and threat categories. You can filter the hosts by various criteria, such as IP address, hostname, domain, or threat category. You can also drill down into each host to see the details of the files, applications, and incidents associated with the host. You can identify the infected host by looking for the host with the highest risk score, infection level, or threat category3.
• For Threat Sources, you need to access the Threat Sources monitor workspace in the Juniper ATP Cloud WebUI by selecting Monitor > Threat Sources. You can see the list of threat sources that have been detected by the Juniper ATP Cloud and their risk scores, threat categories, and geolocations. You can filter the threat sources by various criteria, such as IP address, domain, or threat category. You can also drill down into each threat source to see the details of the files, applications, and incidents associated with the threat source. You can identify the attack source by looking for the threat source with the highest risk score, threat category, or geolocation that matches the infected host.

References:

• File Scanning
• Encrypted Traffic
• Hosts
• [Threat Sources]

An IKE security association (SA) is a set of parameters that define how the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol will authenticate and establish the secure channel between the IPsec VPN peers. When you configure an IPsec VPN, one IKE SA is created between the peers, regardless of how many CoS forwarding classes are used to separate the traffic. The SA will be used to negotiate the IPsec SA parameters, such as encryption algorithms and keys.

In this scenario, only 1 IKE security association is required between the IPsec peers, no matter how many CoS forwarding classes are used to separate the voice and data traffic.

A logical system is a virtualization feature in SRX Series devices that allows you to create multiple, isolated virtual routers within a single physical device. Each logical system has its own routing table, firewall policies, and interfaces, and it can be managed and configured independently of the other logical systems. Logical systems are an effective way to isolate different administrative domains and to support a large number of virtualized instances.

According to the Juniper documentation, the solution that would best meet the requirements of deploying a virtualization solution with the security devices in the network is logical systems. Logical systems are a feature that allows the SRX Series device to be partitioned into multiple logical devices, each with its own discrete administrative domain, routing table, firewall policies, VPNs, and interfaces1. Each logical system can support up to 100 virtualized instances, depending on the SRX Series model and the available resources2.

The following solutions are not suitable or incorrect for this scenario:

• VRF instances: VRF instances are a type of routing instance that allows the SRX Series device to maintain multiple routing tables for different VPNs or customers. However, VRF instances do not provide separate administrative domains, firewall policies, or interfaces for each instance3.
• Virtual router instances: Virtual router instances are a type of routing instance that allows the SRX Series device to create multiple logical routers, each with its own routing table and interfaces. However, virtual router instances do not provide separate administrative domains or firewall policies for each instance.
• Tenant systems: Tenant systems are a feature that allows the SRX Series device to create multiple logical devices, each with its own discrete administrative domain, routing table, firewall policies, VPNs, and interfaces. However, tenant systems are only supported on the SRX1500, SRX4100, and SRX4200 devices, and each tenant system can only support up to 10 virtualized instances.

References: 1: Understanding Logical Systems 2: SRX Series Logical Systems Feature Guide 3: vrf (Routing Instances) : [virtual-router (Routing Instances)] : [Understanding Tenant Systems]

The exhibit shows the output of the show security mka sessions summary command on an SRX Series device. This command displays the status of the MACsec Key Agreement (MKA) sessions on the device. In the output, we can see that there are two CAKs configured for the interface ge-0/0/1 - FFFF and EEEE. The CAK named FFFF has the type preceding and the status live. The CAK named EEEE has the type fallback and the status active.

The two statements that are true about the CAK status for the CAK named FFFF are:

• CAK is not used for encryption and decryption of the MACsec session. This is because the CAK is only used for authentication and key exchange between the MACsec peers. The CAK is not used for encrypting or decrypting the MACsec traffic. The encryption and decryption of the MACsec session is done by the Secure Association Key (SAK), which is derived from the CAK using the MKA protocol.
• SAK is not generated using this key. This is because the CAK named FFFF has the type preceding, which means that it is a legacy key that is used for backward compatibility with older MACsec devices. The preceding key is not used for generating the SAK, but only for authenticating the MACsec peers. The SAK is generated using the active key, which is the CAK named EEEE in this case.

References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

According to the Juniper documentation, the steps to detect domain generation algorithms (DGA) on an SRX Series firewall are as follows:

• Define a security-metadata-streaming policy under [edit services]. A security-metadata-streaming policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to collect and stream security metadata, such as DNS queries and responses, to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis. Juniper ATP Cloud uses machine learning models and known pre-computed DGA domain names to provide domain verdicts, which helps in-line blocking and sinkholing of DNS queries on SRX Series firewalls1. You can define a security-metadata-streaming policy by using the following command:

set services security-metadata-streaming policy

• Attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone. A security zone is a logical grouping of interfaces that have similar security requirements. You can attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone by using the following command:

set security zones security-zone services security-metadata-streaming policy

The following steps are not required or incorrect:

• Define an advanced-anti-malware policy under [edit services]. An advanced-anti-malware policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to scan files for malware using Juniper ATP Cloud. It is not related to DGA detection2.
• Attach the advanced-anti-malware policy to a security policy. A security policy is a configuration that defines the rules for permitting or denying traffic between security zones. It is not related to DGA detection3.

References: 1: Configuring Security Metadata Streaming 2: Configuring Advanced Anti-Malware Policies 3: Configuring Security Policies