PCI SSC Assessor_New_V4 Dumps

classifying media that contains cardholder data is intended to ensure that media is property protected according to the sensitivity of the data it contains, which means it should be markedwith labels or tags that indicate its level of confidentiality or integrity. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that media containing cardholder data is properly labeled.

According to the PCI PTS standard2, point-of-interaction devices used to protect account data are point-of-interaction devices (POI), which are devices that are used to authenticate, authorize, or verify cardholder data or transactions. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that POI devices are used in accordance with PCI DSS.

The PCI DSS requires that the assessor validates that the sample of business facilities is representative of the entire population of facilities that are in scope for the assessment. According to the PCI DSS Requirement 12.8.5, “Maintain information about which PCI DSS requirements are managed by each service provider, and which are managed by the entity.” Furthermore, according to the PCI DSS Requirement 12.9.1, “For service providers, provide the written agreement/acknowledgment to their customers as specified at Requirement 12.8.2.” Therefore, the scenario that meets the PCI DSS requirements for validating the sample of business facilities is theone where all types and locations of facilities are represented, to ensure that the assessment covers the diversity and complexity of the card production environment. The other scenarios either do not account for the variability of the facilities, or do not follow the sampling methodology defined by the PCI DSS. References: PCI DSS v3.2.1, Card Production Security Assessor - Physical - Credly

According to requirement 4, PAN must be protected with strong cryptography for transmission over private wireless networks, which means it should use encryption techniques such as WEP, WPA, WPA2, or TLS/SSL to prevent unauthorized access or interception of cardholder data over wireless networks. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that PAN is protected from unauthorized access or interception.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, an internal NTP server that provides time services to the cardholder data environment is in scope for PCI DSS if it stores processes or transmits cardholder data, regardless of whether it provides authentication services to systems in the DMZ or not. This is one of the requirements for preventing unauthorized access to cardholder data using time services.

The customized approach is a new option in PCI DSS v4.0 that allows entities to use alternate security controls or new technologies that meet the PCI DSS Customized Approach Objective for a requirement1. The customized approach requires the entity to complete and document a Controls Matrix and a Targeted Risk Analysis (TRA) for each customized control, and to provide this documentation to the assessor2. The assessor’s role is to review the documentation, assess the customized control, and verify that the customized approach was correctly followed3. The assessor must also document the assessment of the customized control in the Report on Compliance (ROC), using the ROC Template provided by PCI SSC4. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

The other options are not true regarding the role of the assessor in the customized approach. Option A is not true because the assessor does not need another assessor to verify the TRA, as the assessor is responsible for reviewing and validating the TRA as part of the assessment process3. Option C is not true because the assessor can and must assess the control and the documentation, as well as document the work on the customized control in the ROC34. Option D is not true because the assessor is allowed to assist the entity with the completion of the Controls Matrix or the TRA, as long as the assessor does not design, develop, or implement the customized control for the entity5. References:

• PCI DSS v4.0: Is the Customized Approach Right For Your Organization?
• PCI DSS v4.0: Roles and Responsibilities for the Customized Approach
• PCI DSS v4.0 Report on Compliance Template
• PCI DSS v4.0
• PCI DSS v4.0: Customized Approach Explained

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, pre-production environments that are located within the cardholder data environment can be used for testing, as long as they are not accessible from untrusted networks and are monitored for any changes or vulnerabilities. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that testing environments are isolated from production environments.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, passwords for default accounts and default administrative accounts should be changed before installing a system on the network. This is one of the requirements for preventing unauthorized access to cardholder data.

According to requirement 4, an entity must monitor its TPSP’s PCI DSS compliance status at least annually, which means it should review its TPSP’s policies and procedures for protecting cardholder data and transactions against fraud and other threats at least once a year. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that an entity monitors its TPSP’s PCI DSS compliance status regularly.

The Secure SLC standard is one of the two standards that are part of the PCI Software Security Framework (SSF), which provides security requirements and assessment procedures for software vendors to integrate into their software development lifecycles and to validate that secure lifecycle management practices are in place12. The Secure SLC standard is designed to offer a more flexible approach to how the security and integrity of payment software is tested, and to address the evolving threat landscape and changes in software development practices3.

The PCI DSS Requirement 6 states that entities must develop and maintain secure systems and applications, and it includes several sub-requirements that cover variousaspects of software security, such as change control, secure coding, vulnerability management, and patching4. By using custom software that is compliant with the Secure SLC standard, an entity may be able to meet some or all of these sub-requirements, as the Secure SLC standard covers similar topics and ensures that the software is developed and maintained in a secure manner throughout its entire lifecycle1. However, this does not automatically make the entity PCI DSS compliant, as there are other requirements and controls that the entity must implement and validate, such as network security, access control, monitoring, and incident response4. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

The other options are not true regarding the impact of using custom software that is compliant with the Secure SLC standard on the PCI DSS assessment. Option A is not true because, as explained above, the entity still has to comply with other PCI DSS requirements and controls that are not covered by the Secure SLC standard. Option C is not true because there is a positive impact to the entity, as it may help the entity to meet several requirements in Requirement 6 and to demonstrate that the custom software is secure and reliable. Option D is not true because the custom software cannot be excluded from the PCI DSS assessment, as it is part of the cardholder data environment (CDE) and it may store, process, or transmit cardholder data or sensitive authentication data. The entity must ensure that the custom software meets the PCI DSS requirements and controls that are applicable to it, and that the assessor validates its compliance4. References:

• Software Security Framework Secure Software Life Cycle (Secure SLC) Standard
• PCI Security Standards Council Publishes Version 1.1 of Secure Software Lifecycle (SLC) Standard and Program
• PCI Security Standards Council Publishes Version 1.1 of Secure Software Standard and Program
• PCI DSS v3.2.1

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the same AOC template is used for ROCs and SAQs. This is one of the requirements for ensuring consistency and accuracy in ROCs and SAQs.

PCI DSS Requirement 10.5.5 states that entities must restrict access to audit logs to those with a job-related need1. This is to prevent unauthorized or malicious users from tampering with or deleting the audit logs, which could compromise the integrity andavailability of the logs and hinder the detection and investigation of security incidents. Audit logs contain sensitive and confidential information, such as cardholder data, user identities, system activities, and security events, and therefore must be protected from unauthorized viewing, modification, or deletion2. Individuals with a job-related need are those who have a legitimate and documented business reason to access the audit logs, such as system administrators, security personnel, auditors, or investigators3. Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

The other options are not true regarding the access control for audit log files. Option A is not true because individuals who performed the logged activity may not have a job-related need to view the audit logs, and may have a conflict of interest or malicious intent to alter or erase the logs. Option B is not true because individuals with read/write access may not have a job-related need to access the audit logs, and may pose a risk of unauthorized or accidental modification or deletion of the logs. Option C is not true because individuals with administrator privileges may not have a job-related need to access the audit logs, and may abuse their privileges or be targeted by attackers to compromise the logs. References:

• PCI DSS v3.2.1
• Effective Daily Log Monitoring - PCI Security Standards Council
• Logging for PCI DSS Compliance - Tueoris

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the assessor may use either their own template or the ROC Reporting Template provided by PCI SSC. This is one of the requirements for ensuring consistency and accuracy in ROCs.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, internal vulnerability scans must be performed after a significant change in any component or configuration that affects cardholder data or payment processing systems. This is one of the requirements for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities that could compromise cardholder data.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the intent of assigning a risk ranking to vulnerabilities is to prioritize the highest risk items so they can be addressed more quickly, rather than ensuring all vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days or replacing the need to quarterly ASV scans or ensuring that critical security patches are installed at least quarterly. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated as soon as possible.

when PAN is sent over the Internet, PAN must be encrypted with strong cryptography, which means it should use encryption techniques such as WEP, WPA, WPA2, or TLS/SSL to prevent unauthorized access or interception. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that PAN is protected from unauthorized access or interception.

all network transmissions must be logged by an entity’s security information and event management (SIEM) system or equivalent tool, which means they should record all network events and activities related to cardholder data processing and transmission. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that network transmissions are monitored and audited.

An LDAP server is a type of directory service that provides authentication and authorization data to the cardholder data environment (CDE)1. According to the PCI DSS scoping and segmentation guidance2, any system that provides a security service to the CDE, such as authentication, is considered a connected or security-impacting system (Category 2) and is in scope for PCI DSS. This is because such systems can affect the security and controls of the CDE and the cardholder data (CHD) or sensitive authentication data (SAD) that it contains. Therefore, an LDAP server providing authentication services to the CDE is in scope for PCI DSS, regardless of whether it stores, processes, or transmits CHD or SAD, or whether it provides authentication services to systems in the DMZ or not. References:

• Guidance for PCI DSS Scoping and Network Segmentation
• What Are the Effects of Using Active Directory as a Shared Service on PCI Compliance?
• The Ultimate Guide To PCI DSS Scoping and Segmentation
• LDAP - PCI Security Standards Council