PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Dumps

Here is the correct matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8 extracts to the audit evidence:

Audit evidence: Three subcontract trainers who had delivered training were not approved as defined in procedure SA1 Supplier Approval revision 3.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.4.1 ...shall apply criteria for ... external providers...(This clause requires the organization to control external providers, including ensuring their approval and competence.)

Audit evidence: A training programme for a customer was not documented as required in procedure TD 2 Training revision 2.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.3.5 ...shall retain documented information on design and development outputs.(This clause addresses the need to retain documented information related to design and development outputs, such as a training programme.)

Audit evidence: One trainer had not recorded the damage to a customer’s training room wall caused by using sticky tape to hang training aids, as required in procedure TD 2 Training revision 2.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.5.3 ...shall retain documented information on what has occurred.(This clause relates to retaining documented information on activities and outcomes, including records of damage or issues encountered.)

Audit evidence: Five sales orders had no record of having been reviewed to verify the ability to provide these courses.ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract: 8.2.3.1 ...shall conduct a review before committing...(This clause specifies the requirement to review and verify the organization's ability to meet customer requirements before accepting sales orders.)

These mappings reflect the specific requirements of ISO 9001:2015 for managing external providers, retaining documented information, and reviewing contracts.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization’s own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.

Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd’s own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.

Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4. The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.

References:

ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems — Requirements, clause 8.4

ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.1 and 6.4.2

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section “Learning objectives”

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6

Table

Statement

First-party audits

Second-party audits

Third-party audits

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.

Yes

No

No

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.

No

No

Yes

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.

No

Yes

No

Here is a brief explanation of each statement:

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.

In this scenario, the organisation A has two plants, A1 and A2, but the production in A2 was discontinued due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the plant was rented to another organisation B. There are no A employees working in A2, and the organisation A expects to reassume production in A2 as soon as possible. Therefore, the appropriate action to plan the internal audit of A’s quality management system is:

•Interview the A2 plant manager, now working in Plant A1: This action involves interviewing the person who is responsible for the management and operation of the plant A2, and who is currently working in the plant A1. The interview should aim to gather information about the status and condition of the plant A2, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality management system, the arrangements and agreements with the organisation B, and the plans and actions to resume production in the plant A25 . This action is relevant and necessary for the internal audit, as it can help to assess the readiness and effectiveness of the quality management system, and to identify any gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed.

The other options are not appropriate actions to plan the internal audit of A’s quality management system, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They are:

•Visit Plant A2 to interview personnel of company B: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the personnel of the organisation B, who are not related to the organisation A and who are not part of the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

•Visit Plant A2 to interview B’s quality manager: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the quality manager of the organisation B, who is not related to the organisation A and who is not part of the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

•Visit Plant A2 to interview A’s security personnel and B’s maintenance department: This action involves visiting the plant A2 and interviewing the security personnel of the organisation A and the maintenance department of the organisation B, who are not directly involved in the quality management system. This action is irrelevant and unnecessary for the internal audit, as it can not provide any evidence or information about the conformity and improvement of the quality management system of the organisation A5 .

Therefore, the correct answer is D.

References: 1: Quality audit - Wikipedia 2: A step-by-step guide to internal quality audits 3: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements 4: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems 5: Audit Process | Flowchart | Summary - Accountinguide : What are the Stages of the Auditing Process & Why it is Important …

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.7, the audit follow-up is the process of verifying the completion and effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the auditee as a result of an audit. The audit follow-up can include two main activities:

Verifying the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions: this means checking whether the actions taken by the auditee have addressed the root causes of the nonconformities and prevented their recurrence or occurrence in other areas. The verification can be done by reviewing documents, records, data, or other evidence provided by the auditee, or by conducting a follow-up audit on site or remotely.

Verifying corrections taken to fix the reported non-conformities: this means checking whether the auditee has corrected the nonconformities identified during the audit and eliminated their immediate effects. The verification can be done by reviewing documents, records, data, or other evidence provided by the auditee, or by conducting a follow-up audit on site or remotely.

The audit follow-up can be conducted as a separate audit or as part of a subsequent audit, depending on the audit programme, the audit objectives, the audit criteria, the audit scope, the audit risks, and the audit findings. The audit follow-up should be planned and conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and the results should be documented and reported accordingly. References:

ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7

ISO 19011 Management Systems Audit Checklist | Process Street, task 6.7.1 and 6.7.2

Conducting the Audit Follow-Up: When to Verify - The Auditor, section “Conducting the audit follow-up”

The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:

•Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body’s procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.

•Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee’s nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM’s response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee’s delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.

•Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.

•Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.

•Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee’s performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee’s QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.

References:

•ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, Clause 6.4.2: Conducting audit activities, Subclause k) and l)

•ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material, Module 5: Conducting an Audit, Slide 20: Closing Meeting

•ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course - IRCA Certified, Section 5.5: Closing Meeting

•Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide (EPG) Template - PECB, Section 3.2: Exam Content Outline, Subsection 3.2.1: Section 1 - Audit Fundamentals, Subsection 3.2.2: Section 2 - Audit Principles, Subsection 3.2.3: Section 3 - Audit Process, Subsection 3.2.4: Section 4 - Audit Competencies

Here is the correct matching of the activities with the responsible parties in the context of a second-party audit:

Define the audit scope: Customer

Develop the audit plan: Audit team leader

Respond to the audit findings: External provider

Conduct the audit: Audit team

This reflects the typical division of responsibilities in a second-party audit, where the customer (the party commissioning the audit) sets the scope, the audit team leader manages the planning, the external provider responds to findings, and the audit team carries out the audit.

The Stage 1 audit is a readiness review that verifies the organization’s ability to conduct the Stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documented information, evaluating the site-specific conditions, and having discussions with personnel. The auditor does not verify the degrees of customer satisfaction, the compliance with legal requirements, or the results of the last management review during the Stage 1 audit. These are done during the Stage 2 audit or later in the certification process. References:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Candidate Handbook

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course IRCA Certified

The table below shows the possible matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract to the audit evidence.

Table

Audit evidence

ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract

Half of all new products launched in the past 12 months were late. The NPD Manager explains he has not got enough people on his team to cope with the demand for new products.

“8.3.2 e) … internal … resource needs for the design and development of products …”

The NPD Manager explains many changes are made to cosmetic formulations during product development owing to retailer feedback. Only when confirmed by the retailer is the agreed formulation documented on SWIFT.

“8.3.5 … retain documented information …”

The NPD Manager explains that the customer confirms their approval to proceed with a new formulation by email. These emails are kept on SWIFT.

“8.3.6 … retain documented information …”

The NPD Manager shows you evidence of consumer trials that are carried out for some new products prior to full-scale launch.

“8.3.4 d) … conducted to ensure that the resulting products and services meet the requirements …”

The NPD Manager explains that an approved external laboratory is used to perform shelf-life stability trials on some formulations during product development.

“8.3.2 e) … external … resource needs for the design and development of products …”

According to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its quality management system. The organization should monitor and review these issues and update them as necessary. Although the standard does not explicitly require documented information of these issues, it does require documented information as evidence of the implementation of the actions taken to address risks and opportunities, as per clause 6.1. The organization should also retain documented information as evidence of the results of the monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of its QMS, as per clause 9.1. Therefore, the auditor should not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question, as he is not the person responsible for the process and may not have the necessary competence or knowledge of the QMS. The auditor should also look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken, as this is a requirement of the standard and a way to verify the effectiveness of the QMS. The other options are not appropriate courses of action for the auditor, because they do not address the audit objective or criteria, or they may compromise the audit integrity or impartiality. For example, option B may not be feasible or reliable, as the Technical Manager may not be available or able to provide the necessary evidence by phone. Option C may cause unnecessary delay and inconvenience for the audit process and the auditee. Option E may not solve the problem, as the guide is not the main source of evidence or information for the audit. Option F may be disrespectful or unprofessional, as the consultant may have a legitimate role or interest in the audit. References: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Context of the Organization, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Audit Evidence

When an organization wishes to extend the scope of their current certification to include new services or activities, such as the printing and compilation of computer documentation packages, it requires an extension to the scope of the audit. This involves a formal application process with the certification body to ensure that the new activities are included in the audit plan and that the organization’s quality management system encompasses these new processes12. References: = The answer is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group guidance on scope and applicability, which outlines the need for a formal application process when there is a change in the scope of the quality management system that affects the certification1. Additionally, the UKAS guide on the extension to scope (ETS) process provides information on how changes to the scope, including the addition of new services, require a formal application2.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.3, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised as necessary to address changes that occur during the audit planning. The audit plan should be agreed upon, preferably in writing, by the audit team leader, the audit client and the auditee1. Therefore, if there is a significant change in the auditee’s situation, such as the cancellation of all orders for the next week, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised accordingly, with the agreement of all parties involved.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.1.4, the certification body should have a process to ensure that the audit team has the competence to achieve the audit objectives, and that the audit methods are appropriate for the scope and complexity of the audit. The certification body should also have a process to ensure that the audit is conducted under reasonable conditions and within a reasonable time frame2. Therefore, if there is a risk that the audit objectives cannot be achieved, or that the audit methods are not suitable, due to the change in the auditee’s situation, the certification body should be consulted and informed on how to proceed with the audit.

Therefore, the best action to take is B, ask the certification body you work for how to proceed with the audit. This action will ensure that the audit plan is revised and agreed upon by all parties, and that the audit team has the competence and the methods to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently. The other options are not correct, as they may compromise the quality and validity of the audit:

•A. Start the audit on Monday at ABC’s as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week: This action may not be feasible or acceptable, as it may extend the audit duration and cost beyond the agreed terms, and it may not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•C. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer’s premises they cleaned the week before: This action may not be relevant or reliable, as it may not reflect the current performance and condition of the auditee’s processes. The audit evidence collected from the previous customer may not be valid or representative of the audit criteria, and it may not address the risks and opportunities associated with the auditee’s context and objectives. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•D. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC’s office, simulating the process they carry out at customers’ premises: This action may not be objective or impartial, as it may introduce bias and influence in the audit process. The audit evidence collected from the simulated process may not be accurate or authentic, and it may not demonstrate the actual capability and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be ethical or professional, as it may compromise the integrity and credibility of the audit and the certification.

References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015(en), Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems — Part 1: Requirements

According to the guidance on conducting the audit closing meeting1, the audit team leader should provide a summary of the audit findings and conclusions, invite discussions, and agree on timelines for any corrective actions. The audit team leader should also be respectful, constructive, and objective when presenting the nonconformities, and avoid any personal or emotional comments. The audit team leader should also consider the impact of the disruptive event (such as the Covid-19 pandemic) on the auditee’s context, interested parties, and risks2, and acknowledge any good practices or improvements observed during the audit. Therefore, option D is the best option, as it follows the best practices for the closing meeting and allows the auditee to understand the nonconformities and their implications, and to participate in the analysis and resolution of the issues. Option A is not correct, as it is not respectful, constructive, or objective, and it does not invite any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also assumes that the audit team leader has the authority to recommend the removal of the supplier from the approved list, which may not be the case. Option B is not correct, as it does not provide enough information or explanation to the auditee, and it does not allow any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, acknowledging any good practices, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. Option C is not correct, as it does not involve the other managers who are responsible for the functions or processes that were audited, and who may have valuable input or information to share. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, inviting discussions, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. References: 1: Conducting the Audit Closing Meeting: Sharing the Results2: Auditing ISO 9001:2015 in the Context of a Disruptive Event.

A white background with black text Description automatically generated

Questions no: 16 Verified Answer: = C. 7.4 Communication Comprehensive But Short Explanation: = Clause 7.4 of ISO 9001:2015 requires the organization to determine the internal and external communications relevant to the quality management system, including what will be communicated, when, with whom, and how. The scenario indicates a potential gap in communication with subcontractors regarding the Quality Policy, objectives, and plans to address risks and opportunities, which is a requirement even if the subcontractors have their own ISO 9001 certified systems123. References: = This response is based on the general requirements of ISO 9001:2015 related to communication with external parties, such as subcontractors, as outlined in various resources discussing Clause 7.4123.

According to the ISO 19011:2018 standard, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, the team leader of an audit team should be an auditor who has demonstrated the competence to manage an audit of the relevant management system scheme. This means that the team leader should have the appropriate knowledge, skills, and experience to plan, conduct, report, and follow-up an audit of the specific management system, such as ISO 9001 for quality management systems. The other options are false because: B. An audit team can include non-qualified auditors, but only as observers or trainees who do not contribute to the audit findings or conclusions. C. A technical expert can assist a qualified auditor on an audit team, but cannot replace them, as a technical expert does not have the competence to perform audits. D. Audits leading to auditor qualification are not undertaken annually, but rather as part of a certification process that involves meeting certain criteria, such as education, work experience, audit experience, and examination. References: ISO 19011:2018, PECB Certified ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Lead Auditor Training Course

According to clause 8.3 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should establish, implement, and maintain a design and development process that is appropriate to ensure the subsequent provision of products and services. The design and development process should include the following activities:

•Determining the requirements for the products and services to be designed and developed, considering the intended use, the statutory and regulatory requirements, the customer and other relevant interested parties’ needs and expectations, and the potential risks and opportunities.

•Defining the design and development objectives, stages, responsibilities, and authorities, and ensuring the availability of adequate resources and competence.

•Implementing design and development controls, such as reviews, verification, and validation, to ensure that the design and development outputs meet the design and development inputs, and to identify and resolve any problems or errors.

•Maintaining documented information on the design and development inputs, outputs, reviews, verification, validation, and changes, and ensuring the traceability and conformity of the products and services to the requirements.

•Managing the design and development changes, by identifying, reviewing, and controlling them, and evaluating their effects on the products and services and the QMS.

In this case, the evidence statements that provide a meaningful audit trail for the design and development process are B, E, and F, because they relate to the design and development controls, the documented information, and the verification activities that are required by the standard. These options can help the auditor to assess the effectiveness and conformity of the design and development process, and to identify any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.3, although they may be relevant for other aspects of the QMS, such as clause 7.2 on competence, clause 7.3 on awareness, clause 7.4 on communication, clause 8.2 on requirements for products and services, clause 8.4 on externally provided processes, products, and services, and clause 8.7 on control of nonconforming outputs. References: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Design and Development, ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 Design and development of products and services

B. Applicable procedure: SP-701

D. Identification number of the washing machine

H. The concentration of the cleaning liquid used vs the concentration fixed in SP-701

I. The planned duration of the process vs the minimum time required in SP-701

J. Weight of linen being washed vs the maximum weight required in SP-701

C. Competence record of the machine operator

Based on the scenario provided, there is evidence of nonconformity with the requirements defined in:

C. Clause 7.5.1 Documented information - General: The scenario indicates that there is no formal process for informing users about updates to the SWIFT database, which suggests a lack of control over documented information. This could lead to users being unaware of important changes and not using the latest version of the software, which is required by the quality management system1.

E. Clause 7.5.3 Control of documented information: The Operations Director’s approach to updating the SWIFT database and the lack of communication to users about these updates indicate that the documented information is not adequately controlled. Allowing users to revert to earlier versions of the software at their discretion further suggests that the organization does not have a proper mechanism in place to ensure the integrity and suitability of documented information2.

These clauses are part of the ISO 9001:2015 standard, which requires organizations to have a systematic approach to controlling and managing documented information as part of their quality management system. The scenario described shows a casual approach to managing critical software updates, which could affect the organization’s ability to consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements.

A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by auditors who are employed by the organization being audited but who have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited1. The purpose of a first-party audit is to assess the conformity of the organization’s quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001 and to identify opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the two auditors who would not participate in a first-party audit are:

•A. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organization: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a customer or supplier of the organization being audited) or a third-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a certification body or registrar).

•F. An auditor from a customer: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit, as a customer is an interested party that has specific requirements for the organization being audited.

The other options are not correct, as they could participate in a first-party audit, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited:

•B. An auditor from an interested party: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as the interested party is within the organization being audited. For example, an auditor from the finance department could audit the production department, as long as they are not involved in the production process or affected by its outcomes.

•C. An auditor trained in-house: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The source of the auditor’s training is not relevant for determining the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•D. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The IRCA scheme is a professional certification scheme for auditors of management systems, which provides recognition of the auditor’s competence and credibility3. However, being trained in the IRCA scheme does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•E. An auditor certified by IRCA: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. Being certified by IRCA means that the auditor has met the requirements of the IRCA scheme and has demonstrated their competence and credibility as an auditor of management systems3. However, being certified by IRCA does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

References: First Party Audits: The 5 Steps to Success - Sync Resource Inc, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group, IRCA - International Register of Certificated Auditors

The correct answer is:

Event

Selecting audit team = Individual(s) managing the audit programme

Conducting the audit = Audit team

Preparing the audit plan = Audit team leader

Requesting the audit = Audit client

To complete the table, click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop each option to the appropriate blank section. Responsibility:- Individual(s) managing the audit programme

Audit team

Audit team leader

Audit client

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5.3, the individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team, taking into account the competence and availability of the auditors and any experts needed. 1

According to clause 6.2, the audit team is responsible for conducting the audit, which includes collecting and verifying audit evidence, evaluating audit findings, and preparing the audit report. 1

According to clause 6.1, the audit team leader is responsible for preparing the audit plan, which includes defining the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and duration, as well as assigning roles and responsibilities to the audit team members. 1

According to clause 5.2, the audit client is the person or organization that requests the audit, which can be the auditee (the person or organization being audited) or any other person or organization that has an interest in the audit results. 1

References:

1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

The purpose of conducting a document review is to determine the conformity of the system, as far as documented, with audit criteria and to gather information to support the audit activities. A document review is a systematic and objective examination of the documented information that is relevant to the audit objectives and scope. It can help the auditor to verify if the documented information is complete, accurate, consistent, and up-to-date. It can also help the auditor to identify any gaps, errors, or nonconformities in the documented information that may affect the audit findings or conclusions.

The other options are not correct because they do not reflect the true purpose of a document review. Option A describes the purpose of an audit report, which is to communicate the audit results and recommendations to the management and other interested parties. Option B describes the purpose of an audit plan, which is to define the scope, objectives, criteria, methods, resources, and schedule of an audit. Option C describes the purpose of an audit evidence report, which is to provide evidence of nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during an audit. Option D describes the purpose of an audit decision report, which is to justify or explain why certain decisions were made during an audit.

I hope this answer helps you understand why option F is correct and why options A-C-D are incorrect. If you want to learn more about ISO 9001 Lead Auditor exam questions and answers, you can check out some of these resources:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Sample Exam Questions and Answers: This article provides some sample questions and answers for each section of the ISO 9001 Lead Auditor exam.

ISO 9001 (QMS) Lead Auditor Quiz Questions and Answers: This article provides some quiz questions and answers on various topics related to ISO 9001 QMS.

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor - Exam Practice Tests: This course offers practice tests with explanations for each question.

Irca Lead Auditor Exam Questions And Answers Pdf: This document contains some exam questions and answers in PDF format.

Analyzing Each Statement:

A.Incorrect. The audit team leader must communicate concerns as they arise, not just during the closing meeting. Per ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.9, significant concerns should be shared promptly with the auditee and audit client during the audit process to allow for immediate understanding and potential resolution.

B.Incorrect. The auditor or team leader is not specifically required to inform the general manager about uncontrolled documents. Instead, the issue is communicated within the framework of the audit findings to the audit client or auditee, as appropriate.

According to clause 10.2.1.b of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent their recurrence. This means that the organization should identify and address the root causes and contributing factors of the nonconformities, and implement appropriate corrective actions that are effective and proportional to the impact of the nonconformities. In this case, the evidence statement that supports the finding of nonconformance is C, because it shows that the organization did not take effective actions to prevent the recurrence of the spelling errors in the print run, which resulted in repeated customer rejections and dissatisfaction. The other options are not directly related to clause 10.2.1.b, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option A may relate to clause 7.2 on competence, option B may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option D may relate to clause 7.1 on resources. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity and Corrective Action], ISO 9001 Clause 10. Improvement - ISO-templates.com

Based on the scenario and the concept of an ‘audit trail’ within the context of ISO 9001, the three statements that apply would likely be:

A. Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers. This indicates a lack of involvement and communication with those responsible for implementing the improvements, which is a key part of an effective audit trail1.

B. Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager. Proper documentation is essential for an audit trail, as it provides evidence that actions have been evaluated and are effective1.

C. Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff. An audit trail should ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and understand the actions being taken, which is not the case here1.

These points suggest issues with the communication, documentation, and involvement of relevant personnel in the quality management system processes, which are crucial for maintaining an effective audit trail and, by extension, a robust quality management system.

According to the ISO 9000:2015 quality management principles document1, risk-based approach is not one of the seven quality management principles that ISO 9000, ISO 9001 and other related quality management standards are based on. The seven quality management principles are:

Customer focus

Leadership

Engagement of people

Process approach

Improvement

Evidence-based decision making

Relationship management

Therefore, risk-based approach is not a quality management principle under ISO 9001:2015.

References: ISO - Quality management principles

 Understanding "Context of the Organization":The term "context of the organization" is defined in ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1, which states:

"The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its quality management system."

The definition emphasizes identifying both internal and external issues that influence the organization's approach to developing and achieving its objectives.

 Option Analysis:

Option A:Correct. This option aligns with the standard definition as it explicitly mentions the combination of internal and external issues that affect the organization’s approach to achieving its objectives, which is the essence of Clause 4.1.

Option B:Incorrect. The term "comparison of internal and external issues" does not reflect the ISO 9001 requirements. The standard does not require a comparison but rather an understanding of these issues.

Option C:Incorrect. Although it mentions "complexity," the focus of ISO 9001:2015 is on identifying relevant issues rather than the complexity of those issues.

Option D:Incorrect. This option mentions "coordination" and focuses only on the positive or negative effects. ISO 9001 requires identifying issues but does not emphasize coordination.

 Clause Reference and Relevance:ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to understand their context because internal and external factors can influence the Quality Management System's effectiveness. Understanding this context helps in:

Addressing risks and opportunities (Clause 6.1).

Aligning the QMS with the organization’s strategic direction.

 Why A is Correct:"Combination of internal and external issues" captures the essence of Clause 4.1, making it the accurate definition of the context of the organization.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.1.1, the organization is required to determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results, and when the monitoring and measuring shall be performed. The organization is also required to retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the results.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the organization should have planned for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature, as it is a critical factor for the quality of the product and the process. The organization should also have established a procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature, using the pyrometer or other suitable methods, to ensure consistency and accuracy. The organization should also have performed periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks, to identify trends, problems, and opportunities for improvement.

Hence, the options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001 are A, E, and F, as they are aligned with the requirements of the clause. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 9.1.1, as they do not pertain to the monitoring and measurement of the billet temperature.

References:

ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems — Requirements, clause 9.1.1

ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.4 and 6.7.2

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section “Learning objectives”

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6

The individual(s) managing the audit programme and the auditee are both roles that contribute to the audit outcomes. The individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for planning, conducting, and reporting on the audit activities, as well as ensuring that they are aligned with the organization’s quality objectives and risk management processes1. The auditee is the person or entity that is subject to an audit, and their participation, cooperation, and feedback are essential for achieving a successful audit outcome2. References:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Candidate Handbook

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course IRCA Certified

 Clause Reference – ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.6 (Release of Products and Services):ISO 9001 requires that products and services are not released to the customer until:

All planned verification activities have been completed.

Acceptance criteria have been met.

Any necessary approvals have been obtained.

In this scenario:

The sacrificial anodes for Project DK were shipped before the galvanic efficiency test results were analyzed.

This constitutes a nonconformity against Clause 8.6 because the products were released without completing the required tests.

 Option Analysis:

A. A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager:Incorrect. While obtaining a concession might mitigate the situation, the nonconformity pertains to the process failure of releasing the products without completing required tests, not the absence of a concession.

B. Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK:Incorrect. The customer was not informed before the release, and there is no indication that this was accepted beforehand. Furthermore, ISO 9001 requires planned processes to be followed, regardless of later acceptance.

C. Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process:Correct. This description accurately reflects the nonconformity. The quality control process required test results to be analyzed and verified before release, which did not happen.

D. The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified:Incorrect. The issue is not about recalling the product but about releasing it without completing the required tests. Recalling the product is not mentioned in the scenario.

 Why C is Correct:

The nonconformity is a clear breach of Clause 8.6, where the products were released without meeting the planned verification requirements.

This demonstrates a failure in adhering to quality control processes, which is a critical aspect of ISO 9001 compliance.

 Key ISO 9001 Reference:

Clause 8.6: Products and services shall not be released to the customer until all planned activities (e.g., testing) have been satisfactorily completed, or the customer has approved the release with knowledge of deviations.

According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

•Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.

•Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.

•Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved.

•Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.

•Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.

In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider’s performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here’s how the situation should be handled:

E. Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.

F. Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.

H. Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.

Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally​​.

B. Control of externally provided processes, products, and services: This is relevant because the organization has outsourced the manufacture of its own brand products to a supplier. According to ISO 9001, the organization must ensure that externally provided processes remain within the control of its quality management system.

C. Design and development of products and services: Even though the organization no longer manufactures in-house, it still needs to control the design and development of its products, especially since they are now being produced by an external provider.

F. Organisation roles and responsibilities: The change in strategy has led to a significant reduction in staff, which would have an impact on the roles and responsibilities within the organization. It is important to audit how these changes have been managed and communicated within the organization to ensure continued effectiveness of the quality management system.

These audit trails are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the importance of controlling externally provided processes and products, managing design and development, and clearly defining roles and responsibilities within the quality management system.

A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

According to the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Improvement Opportunities1, an improvement opportunity is a suggestion made by the auditor for the auditee to consider that, if implemented, may enhance the performance of the QMS. Improvement opportunities are not mandatory, but they should be based on objective evidence and aligned with the audit criteria and objectives. Improvement opportunities should also be realistic, feasible, and beneficial for the auditee. In this case, the evidence statements that represent acceptable improvement opportunities in the report are A, C, and E, because they address the potential causes and effects of the spelling errors in the print run, and propose possible actions that may improve the quality of the products and services, and the effectiveness of the QMS. These options are consistent with the requirements and principles of ISO 9001, such as clause 6.1 on actions to address risks and opportunities, clause 8.1 on operational planning and control, clause 8.5.1 on control of production and service provision, and clause 10.2 on nonconformity and corrective action. The other options are not appropriate improvement opportunities, because they are either irrelevant, unrealistic, or unhelpful for the auditee. For example, option B may contradict the audit objective and scope, option D may imply a lack of auditor competence or impartiality, option F may not address the root cause of the problem, option G may not be applicable or effective, and option H may not be feasible or justified. References: ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Improvement Opportunities, ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Audit Evidence

Understanding the Purpose of a Quality Management System (QMS):The primary objective of ISO 9001:2015 is to improve the overall performance of the organization by:

Ensuring consistent delivery of products and services that meet customer and regulatory requirements.

Focusing on enhancing customer satisfaction.

Promoting continual improvement of the organization’s processes and practices.