PMI PMI-PBA Dumps

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system or a process to achieve a specific goal. A use case can help to prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as it can capture the functional requirements and the expected behavior of the system or the process, as well as the exceptions and alternative flows. A use case can also help to design and execute test cases that cover all the possible scenarios and outcomes. In this case, a use case could have prevented the problem of a worker using a field that was not supposed to be used, as it could have specified the valid inputs and outputs for the report, and the actions and responses of the system or the process. Prototyping, diagrams, and document analysis are other techniques that can help to analyze and communicate requirements, but they do not necessarily prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as they do not describe the interactions and outcomes of the system or the process in detail. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 165-166.

The best approach to resolve this issue is to suggest re-estimating the requirement and following the change control process. This would allow the project team to assess the impact of the change request, evaluate the feasibility and cost of the modification, and obtain the approval of the stakeholders before implementing the change. A change control process is a method used to manage change requests for projects and big initiatives. It’s part of a change management plan, which defines the roles for managing change within a team or company1. Meeting with the customer and apologizing for misunderstanding the business’s need is not sufficient, as it does not address the root cause of the problem or propose a solution. Providing the stakeholder with a copy of the approved requirements baseline and moving forward without making a change is not acceptable, as it ignores the stakeholder’s feedback and dissatisfaction. Requiring development resources to work overtime to modify the deliverable to satisfy the stakeholder is not advisable, as it may compromise the quality of the work, increase the project cost and risk, and demoralize the team. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What Is a Change Control Process? (with Example Change Log)

 The business analyst would use brainstorming to identify stakeholders. Brainstorming is a technique that involves generating ideas or solutions through a group discussion or a creative thinking process. Brainstorming can help the business analyst to identify potential stakeholders who have an interest, influence, or impact on the project or the solution, and to solicit their input and feedback on the project requirements and expectations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 38.

 Interviewing is a technique to elicit information, opinions, or feedback from stakeholders by asking them questions and listening to their responses. Interviewing can be used to clarify or validate requirements, resolve conflicts or misunderstandings, build rapport and trust, and explore complex or sensitive issues. A good time to consider using the interviewing method is when there are communication challenges among stakeholders, such as different perspectives, expectations, or interests. Interviewing can help to overcome these challenges by providing a direct and personal communication channel, allowing the interviewer to tailor the questions and responses to each stakeholder, and facilitating a deeper understanding of the stakeholder’s needs and concerns. The other options are not good times to consider using the interviewing method. Attempting to obtain sign-off on requirements from stakeholders is not an elicitation activity, but a validation activity that requires formal documentation and approval. There is not enough time to gather requirements from many different sources is a constraint that limits the use of interviewing, as it is a time-consuming and resource-intensive technique that can only involve a few stakeholders at a time. Assembling a requirements traceability matrix is not an elicitation activity, but an analysis activity that involves linking the requirements to their sources and deliverables using a tool or document. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 10; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50.

A test case is a set of conditions or variables under which a tester will determine whether a system under test satisfies the requirements or works correctly. A test case is derived from the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and it specifies the input data, expected output, and execution steps. A test case is incorrect if it does not match the requirements or the acceptance criteria, or if it contains errors, ambiguities, or inconsistencies. If the business analyst receives a test result report that shows evidence of defective functionality, but verifies that the functionality behaves according to the requirements, the business analyst should first verify that the test case is incorrect. This can be done by reviewing the test case, comparing it with the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and identifying any discrepancies or flaws. By verifying that the test case is incorrect, the business analyst can avoid unnecessary changes to the requirements or the solution, and ensure that the test results are valid and reliable. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 101.

 A force-field analysis is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the factors or forces that support or oppose a change or an initiative. It can help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative by showing the pros and cons of the initiative, as well as the relative strength and importance of each factor. A force-field analysis can also help to develop strategies to increase the supporting forces or decrease the opposing forces, or both, to achieve the desired outcome. A PEST analysis is a tool that helps to examine the external factors that affect an organization or an initiative, such as political, economic, social, and technological factors. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the internal factors or the balance of forces. A feasibility analysis is a tool that helps to evaluate the viability and suitability of a project or an initiative, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the supporting and opposing forces. A gap analysis is a tool that helps to compare the current state and the desired state of a process, a product, or a service, and identify the gaps or differences between them. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the factors or forces that influence the initiative. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, What is Force Field Analysis: Definition and Example

 Engaging all stakeholders early in the requirements gathering phase is a good practice to ensure stakeholder satisfaction with the enhancement. By involving the stakeholders in the elicitation process, the business analyst can understand their needs, expectations, preferences, and constraints. By defining the acceptance criteria with the stakeholders, the business analyst can establish a clear and measurable definition of what constitutes a successful solution. Engaging all stakeholders early can also help to build trust, collaboration, and buy-in for the change. Requesting that the project manager identify all affected project stakeholders is not sufficient to ensure stakeholder satisfaction, as it does not involve direct communication with the stakeholders. Providing all signed-off project documentation to the stakeholders for information purposes only is not effective, as it does not allow for feedback or validation from the stakeholders. Soliciting feedback and adding requirements to the project backlog is not advisable, as it can lead to scope creep, rework, and delays. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 66.

A configuration management system is a standardized, effective, and efficient way to manage changes to project documentation. A configuration management system is a set of tools and processes that help to track, control, and update the configuration items (CIs) of a project, such as documents, requirements, designs, code, tests, etc. A configuration management system helps to ensure that the project documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to maintain the traceability and auditability of the changes made to the project documentation. A configuration management system typically includes the following components:

A configuration management plan that defines the scope, roles, responsibilities, policies, procedures, and standards for configuration management.

A configuration management database (CMDB) that stores the information about the CIs, their attributes, relationships, versions, baselines, and changes.

A configuration identification process that assigns unique identifiers and names to the CIs and their versions.

A configuration control process that evaluates, approves, and implements changes to the CIs and their versions.

A configuration status accounting process that records and reports the status and history of the CIs and their versions.

A configuration verification and audit process that verifies and validates the CIs and their versions against the requirements and specifications.

References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 13.

 A version control system is a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A version control system is a tool that allows the business analyst to manage and record changes to the requirements documentation throughout the project lifecycle. A version control system can help to ensure that the requirements documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date. A version control system can also help to facilitate collaboration and communication among the team members and stakeholders who work on or use the requirements documentation. A version control system can also help to identify and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from concurrent or conflicting changes to the requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is a technique that involves grouping similar or related ideas, issues, or data into categories based on their affinity or similarity. An affinity diagram can help to organize and analyze complex or diverse information, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A data dictionary is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes that are used or produced by a system or a solution. A data dictionary can help to standardize and clarify the meaning and usage of data elements, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is a tool that documents and organizes the business rules that govern or constrain a system or a solution. A business rules matrix can help to specify and communicate the logic and behavior of a system or a solution, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

A cost-benefit analysis is a tool or technique that compares the expected costs and benefits of a project or an investment. It helps to determine the value of a business case by estimating the net present value (NPV) of the project, which is the difference between the present value of the benefits and the present value of the costs. A positive NPV indicates that the project is worth pursuing, while a negative NPV suggests that the project should be rejected. A cost-benefit analysis can also calculate the return on investment (ROI) of the project, which is the ratio of the net benefits to the net costs. A higher ROI implies a higher value of the business case. A cost-benefit analysis can also consider the qualitative aspects of the project, such as the risks, assumptions, constraints, and opportunities12.

A variance analysis is a tool or technique that compares the actual performance of a project with the planned or expected performance. It helps to identify and explain the deviations or differences between the actual and planned results, such as costs, schedule, scope, quality, and benefits. A variance analysis can also provide corrective actions or recommendations to improve the project performance and align it with the business case13.

A SWOT analysis is a tool or technique that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project, a business, or a situation. It helps to identify the internal and external factors that can affect the success or failure of the project or the business. A SWOT analysis can also provide strategies or actions to leverage the strengths and opportunities, and to overcome or mitigate the weaknesses and threats14.

A feasibility analysis is a tool or technique that assesses the viability and practicality of a project or a solution. It helps to determine if the project or the solution can be implemented within the available resources, time, budget, and technology. A feasibility analysis can also evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the project or the solution, and compare it with other alternatives15.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 123-124; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125-126; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 127-128; 5 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 129-130

 A change-driven approach is the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A change-driven approach is an adaptive and iterative approach that embraces changes and feedback throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the organization to explore different options and alternatives for the solution and deliver value incrementally and frequently. A change-driven approach is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A plan-driven approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A plan-driven approach is a predictive and sequential approach that follows a detailed plan and minimizes changes and deviations from the baseline. It requires the organization to have a clear and stable vision of the solution and deliver value at the end of the project. A plan-driven approach is suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A waterfall approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A waterfall approach is a type of plan-driven approach that divides the project into distinct phases and completes each phase before moving to the next one. It does not allow for any changes or revisions once a phase is completed. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have very simple, well-defined, and fixed requirements and solutions. An analytical approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. An analytical approach is a technique or a method for solving problems or making decisions based on data, logic, and reasoning. It does not refer to a specific project management or business analysis approach. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 28-29; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

Interface analysis is a technique to describe how different components or systems interact with each other and exchange information. Interface analysis can help to identify the inputs, outputs, and dependencies of each system, and to ensure that they are compatible and consistent with each other. Interface analysis can also help to detect potential integration issues, gaps, and conflicts among the systems. An organization that is in the process of replacing its current system should conduct interface analysis to facilitate a successful migration, as it would help to ensure that all current connections to other systems remain functional after the upgrade. The other options are not correct. Document analysis is a technique to review existing documents or records to elicit information or requirements. User interface analysis is a technique to design and evaluate how users interact with a system or product. Systems analysis is a technique to understand and model the structure, behavior, and functions of a system or process.

 Value-ranking criteria are a set of factors or measures that are used to evaluate and prioritize the value of backlog items. Value-ranking criteria can include business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. The stakeholders follow the value-ranking criteria to determine the value of backlog items based on their alignment with the project vision and goals. The stakeholders can also use techniques such as MoSCoW analysis or weighted ranking matrix to apply the value-ranking criteria. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a critical design review is a formal review that occurs after the completion of the design phase of a project. The purpose of a critical design review is to verify that the design specification meets the requirements and that the solution is feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to the customer. A critical design review can help to establish an approved requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

A configuration management system is a tool that can be used to trace the large number of requirements that will be generated by this project. A configuration management system is a system that consists of the processes, procedures, tools, and databases that are used to manage and control the configuration items of the project. A configuration item is any component of the project that has a defined and approved version, such as a requirement, a deliverable, a document, a model, a test case, etc. A configuration management system can help the business analyst and the project team to record, track, update, and maintain the configuration items throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure their consistency, integrity, and traceability. A configuration management system can also help to handle changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements. A prototype is a representation of a solution that allows stakeholders to interact with it and provide feedback. By developing a prototype, the business analyst can gather functional requirements from the end user and ensure that the new interface supports their core business processes. A prototype can also help to reduce ambiguity, resolve conflicts, and increase stakeholder satisfaction. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 Acceptance criteria are the conditions that must be met for a solution or deliverable to be accepted by the stakeholders. Acceptance criteria should be measurable, testable, and clear, so that the team can verify if the requirements have been met or not. If the acceptance criteria for the requirements were not measurable, the team would have difficulty confirming if certain requirements have been met, as they would not have a clear and objective way to evaluate the solution or deliverable. The other options are not likely to cause this issue. The test engineer is not responsible for communicating requirements to the team, but for testing them against the acceptance criteria. Not all stakeholders need to be involved during requirements elicitation, as long as the key stakeholders who can provide relevant and accurate information are consulted. Requirements should be adequately reviewed with the project sponsor, but this does not affect the confirmation of meeting the requirements, as the sponsor is not the one who verifies them. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

Version control is a technique that helps to manage changes to requirements and ensure that only authorized changes are made. It also helps to maintain a history of requirements changes, which records the date, reason, and impact of each change. Tracking the status of each requirement helps to monitor the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. These practices help to ensure the integrity of requirements and avoid confusion, inconsistency, or ambiguity. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 8; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 38.

The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

The business analyst should use document analysis as an elicitation technique during this time. Document analysis is a technique that involves reviewing and analyzing existing documents, such as policies, procedures, standards, reports, or contracts, to elicit information about the business needs, requirements, or solution options. Document analysis is useful when the stakeholders are not available to participate, or when the business analyst needs to gain background knowledge or context before engaging with the stakeholders. Document analysis can also help to identify gaps, issues, or assumptions that need to be clarified or validated with the stakeholders later. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 51.

A requirements baseline is a set of approved requirements that serves as the basis for further development and validation. A requirements baseline approval form is a document that records the formal acceptance of the requirements baseline by the customer and other stakeholders. Creating a requirements baseline approval form for the customer to review and approve is the best action to take to establish an approved requirements baseline with the customer. The other actions are not sufficient or appropriate for this purpose. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables, but it does not record the approval of the requirements. Requesting that the customer create a baseline of the requirements in the contract specification is not a proactive or collaborative approach. Performing a variance analysis on the design specification and reporting the results to the customer is not relevant to establishing an approved requirements baseline. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

Tracing requirements is a technique that involves tracking the origin, dependencies, allocation, and status of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. Tracing requirements can help the business analyst to determine this issue before delivery by ensuring that each project objective is linked to one or more requirements, and that each requirement is verified and validated against the project objectives. Tracing requirements can also help to identify any missing, redundant, or conflicting requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

The next step that the business analyst should take after incorporating all the relevant feedback from stakeholders in the business analysis plan is to obtain approval on the plan. The business analysis plan is a document that describes how the business analysis activities will be performed, managed, and controlled throughout the project. It should be approved by the key stakeholders before the business analyst starts documenting or implementing the requirements. The approval process ensures that the stakeholders agree on the scope, approach, deliverables, roles, and responsibilities of the business analysis work. Starting documenting requirements without obtaining approval on the plan is not advisable, as it may lead to confusion, rework, or conflicts among the stakeholders. Storing the document for safe keeping is not a productive step, as it does not communicate or validate the plan with the stakeholders. Starting implementing the project without obtaining approval on the plan is not feasible, as it may result in wasted resources, missed expectations, or failed outcomes. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 29-30; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

The customer and the business analyst are collaborating in the development of a solution scope, which is a description of the boundaries, assumptions, and deliverables of the solution that will address the business need. It is important for the customer to spend the time required to provide, clarify, and elaborate requirements, because requirements are the basis for defining the solution scope. Requirements are the capabilities, features, functions, and qualities that the solution must have or meet to satisfy the customer and the stakeholders. By providing, clarifying, and elaborating requirements, the customer can help the business analyst to understand the problem, the needs, the expectations, and the value proposition of the solution. This will enable the business analyst to define a solution scope that is aligned with the customer’s vision and goals, and that is feasible, viable, and desirable. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 15.

 A matrix is a tool that can be used to record, organize, and track the requirements throughout the lifecycle of the project. A matrix can help the business analyst to identify the sources, dependencies, relationships, and attributes of the requirements, as well as to monitor their status, changes, and traceability. A matrix can also facilitate the communication, verification, and validation of the requirements with the stakeholders, and ensure their alignment with the business needs and objectives. A matrix can be updated and reviewed regularly to reflect the current state of the requirements and the solution, and to obtain the approval and acceptance from the stakeholders. A common example of a matrix is the Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM), which is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

The business analyst would recommend formal signoff to the group if errors in the product could result in financial solvency. Formal signoff is a process that ensures that the stakeholders agree on and approve the requirements and deliverables of the project. Formal signoff can help to reduce ambiguity, confusion, or disputes among the stakeholders and increase their accountability and commitment to the project. Formal signoff is especially important when errors in the product could result in financial solvency, as it implies that there is a high level of risk, complexity, or regulation involved in the project and that any mistake or defect could have severe consequences for the organization or its customers. The industry being unregulated is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less need for compliance or verification of the product quality or performance. The project impact being contained within a small department of the company is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less stakeholder involvement or interest in the project outcome or value. The organization following an iterative project life cycle is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is more flexibility and adaptability in the project scope and deliverables and that feedback and validation are obtained frequently throughout the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

 MoSCoW is a requirements prioritization method that classifies requirements into four categories: Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This method helps the business analyst and the stakeholders to agree on the essential requirements that must be delivered within a fixed time frame, and the desirable requirements that can be deferred or dropped if necessary. MoSCoW is suitable for this project because it allows the business analyst to focus on the minimum viable product that meets the business need of replacing the current enrollment and billing software application before the vendor contract ends, and to cope with the large volume of requirements by prioritizing them based on their value and urgency. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 Phased baselining is an approach that involves dividing the requirements into smaller subsets or increments that can be approved, developed, and delivered separately. Phased baselining can help to cope with the requirements’ volatility, as it allows the business analyst and the stakeholders to accommodate changes and feedback in each increment, and to adjust the scope and priorities of the subsequent increments accordingly. Phased baselining can also reduce the risk and uncertainty of the project, as it enables early validation and verification of the solution, and provides more flexibility and adaptability to the changing business environment and regulations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

A requirements traceability tool is a tool that provides combined functionality for business analysis and quality assurance activities. It helps to document and track the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the sources of the requirements, and the project deliverables. It also helps to monitor the status, changes, and verification of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability tool can also support the analysis, validation, and testing of the requirements, as well as the evaluation of the solution quality and performance12.

A functional specification tool is a tool that helps to define and document the functional requirements of a system or a solution. It describes the features, functions, behaviors, and inputs and outputs of the system or the solution. It also specifies the acceptance criteria and the expected results of the system or the solution. A functional specification tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities13.

A system use case modeling tool is a tool that helps to illustrate and communicate the interactions and scenarios between the users and the system or the solution. It uses diagrams, symbols, and text to represent the actors, use cases, relationships, and flows of events of the system or the solution. It also defines the preconditions, postconditions, and exceptions of each use case. A system use case modeling tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities14.

A solution quality assurance tool is a tool that helps to measure and evaluate the quality of the system or the solution. It uses various methods and techniques, such as testing, inspection, review, audit, and feedback, to check the quality of the system or the solution against the quality standards and criteria. It also identifies and reports any quality issues, defects, or errors of the system or the solution. A solution quality assurance tool is mainly used for quality assurance activities, but not for business analysis activities1 .

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 135; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125

 A requirements baseline document is the most valuable document for a business analyst to provide to the project sponsor to know which requirements will be implemented. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It also serves as a reference point for managing changes and measuring progress. A requirements traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationship between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design, test cases, or deliverables. A requirements traceability matrix can help to ensure completeness, consistency, and quality of the requirements, but it does not indicate which requirements will be implemented. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan can help to define the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements, but it does not specify which requirements will be implemented. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix can help to evaluate the performance or quality of a solution, but it does not determine which requirements will be implemented. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

 Quality function deployment (QFD) is a technique that involves translating customer needs or requirements into product features or specifications. QFD helps to relate the product features to customer value by using a matrix called a House of Quality, which shows how each feature satisfies a customer requirement, how important each requirement is to the customer, how well each feature performs compared to competitors, and how each feature affects other features. QFD can also help to identify gaps or opportunities for improvement in the product design. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Planning is to “Develop a risk management plan for business analysis activities and monitor risks, issues, and assumptions” (Task 9). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and managing the risks that may affect the business analysis activities and deliverables. If the risks are not addressed properly, they may result in deviations from the baseline budget, schedule, scope, or quality of the product. Therefore, the issue in this scenario could be that the risks identified in the risk management plan were not addressed properly.

 Communication is a technique that involves exchanging information and feedback with stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. Communication can help the business analyst to deal with conflicting requirements by informing the stakeholders about the nature, cause, and impact of the conflict, and facilitating a resolution that satisfies their needs and expectations. Communication can also help to prevent or reduce future conflicts by establishing clear and consistent channels, methods, and frequency of communication. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.

The business need is the reason why the project is initiated and the problem or opportunity that the project aims to address. The business need defines the key business drivers and the desired outcomes of the project. By asking what the business need is, the business analyst can understand the value proposition of the project and prioritize the requirements that align with the business objectives and deliver the most benefits to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 23.

The business analyst should communicate that the status of this requirement has changed to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the development team, and the quality assurance team. Communication is an essential skill for business analysts, as it helps to ensure that everyone involved in the project is aware of the current state of the requirements, the rationale behind any changes, and the impact of those changes on the project scope, schedule, budget, quality, and risks. Communication also helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid confusion or conflicts. Bringing the subsequent project to the change control board (CCB) is not necessary at this stage, as the requirement has been deferred and not added to another project. Asking the stakeholders to review the requirement before any other action is taken is not effective, as the requirement cannot be implemented until the needed information is available. Marking the requirement as complete so that it is not forgotten is incorrect, as it does not reflect the true status of the requirement and may cause errors or inconsistencies in the requirements documentation and traceability. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

Nonfunctional requirements are the characteristics or qualities of a solution that describe how well it performs or operates. They include aspects such as usability, reliability, availability, scalability, security, performance, etc. The website crashing frequently indicates that the nonfunctional requirements related to availability and performance were not identified and tested properly. Quality attributes are another term for nonfunctional requirements, so option A is equivalent to option C. Critical business requirements and essential product requirements are both functional requirements, which describe what a solution does or provides, not how well it does it. Therefore, options B and D are incorrect. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 114-115.

 A closed-ended survey using the Likert scale is a type of survey that asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements related to the current business process. This type of survey is useful for gathering data that can be used in a statistical analysis to measure user satisfaction, identify pain points, and evaluate the performance of the current business process. A closed-ended survey is also easier to administer and analyze than an open-ended survey, which requires more time and effort to code and interpret the responses. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 91.

 A weighted-ranking matrix is a technique that involves assigning scores and weights to different criteria and options to compare and prioritize them. A weighted-ranking matrix can help the business analyst to prepare the recommendation by quantifying and ranking the three different solution options based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and other factors. A weighted-ranking matrix can also help to justify and communicate the recommendation with evidence and transparency. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

Requirements baseline is a document that contains the approved version of the requirements that serves as a reference point for further changes. Requirements baseline can help the business analyst to address the issue of underestimating the required budget and schedule by defining the scope, value, quality, risk, and feasibility of each requirement. Requirements baseline can also help to negotiate the scope in the contract with the customer by showing how each requirement aligns with their needs and expectations, and proposing possible trade-offs or alternatives. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a requirements review is a formal meeting where the requirements are presented and evaluated by the stakeholders, subject matter experts, and other relevant parties. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, testable, and aligned with the business needs and objectives. To prepare for the review, it would be best for the team to evaluate the requirements and highlight those that cannot be met or need to be deferred, as this would help to identify any gaps, risks, issues, or dependencies that need to be addressed or resolved before proceeding to the design phase. Preparing a test procedure, starting the design, or requesting a contract amendment are not appropriate actions to take before the review, as they could introduce errors, biases, or conflicts in the requirements. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 181-182.

 A product scope is a description of the features, functions, and characteristics of a product that meets the needs and expectations of the stakeholders. It defines what the product is and what it is not, and provides the basis for planning, developing, testing, and delivering the product. A product scope should align with the company’s objectives, which are the desired outcomes or results that the company wants to achieve through its products, services, and projects. Aligning the product scope with the company’s objectives helps to ensure that the product delivers value to the customers and the business, supports the company’s vision and mission, and contributes to the company’s strategic goals12.

To collaborate on a product scope that aligns with the company’s objectives, the business analyst should follow these steps12:

Identify and engage the relevant stakeholders, such as the human resources, engineering, and marketing departments, as well as the product sponsor, the customers, and the end users. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the product, and who can provide input, feedback, and approval for the product scope.

Elicit and analyze the business needs, requirements, and expectations of the stakeholders, using various techniques, such as interviews, surveys, workshops, observation, prototyping, and brainstorming. Business needs are the problems or opportunities that the product aims to address or exploit, and that justify the investment in the product. Requirements are the specifications or conditions that the product must meet or satisfy to fulfill the business needs. Expectations are the desires or wishes that the stakeholders have for the product, which may or may not be realistic or feasible.

Validate and prioritize the business needs, requirements, and expectations, based on their value, urgency, risk, dependency, and alignment with the company’s objectives. Validation is the process of ensuring that the business needs, requirements, and expectations are clear, complete, correct, consistent, and feasible. Prioritization is the process of ranking the business needs, requirements, and expectations according to their relative importance and impact on the product scope and the company’s objectives.

Define and document the product scope, using various tools, such as a product vision statement, a product scope statement, a product backlog, a product roadmap, and a product breakdown structure. A product vision statement is a brief and compelling description of the purpose, value proposition, and target market of the product. A product scope statement is a detailed and formal description of the product scope, including the product objectives, deliverables, features, functions, boundaries, assumptions, constraints, and acceptance criteria. A product backlog is a list of the product requirements, features, and enhancements that are prioritized and refined for development. A product roadmap is a high-level and strategic plan that shows the direction, timeline, and milestones of the product development. A product breakdown structure is a hierarchical and graphical representation of the product components and their relationships.

Communicate and manage the product scope, using various techniques, such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, audits, and change control. Communication is the process of sharing and exchanging the product scope information with the stakeholders, and ensuring that they understand and agree on the product scope. Management is the process of monitoring and controlling the product scope, and ensuring that it is delivered according to the plan and the company’s objectives. Change control is the process of evaluating, approving, and implementing any changes to the product scope, and ensuring that they are aligned with the company’s objectives.

Voting on the product’s highest-value business needs is not the best option, because it may not consider the perspectives and preferences of all the stakeholders, and it may not reflect the company’s objectives. Negotiating to best meet each department’s objectives is not the best option, because it may result in compromises or trade-offs that may not benefit the product or the company as a whole, and it may not align with the company’s objectives. Delegating the decision to be made by the product sponsor is not the best option, because it may not involve the participation and collaboration of the other stakeholders, and it may not align with the company’s objectives. References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133-134

Clear and unambiguous requirements are crucial for verification. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings and difficulty in assessing whether the product meets the specified needs during testing. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

Before beginning requirements elicitation, the business analyst should document how the relevant systems interact. This is an important activity that helps to understand the current state of the systems, their interfaces, dependencies, and data flows. It also helps to identify the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement in the systems. Documenting how the systems interact can be done using various techniques, such as system context diagrams, data flow diagrams, or interface analysis12.

Preparing the requirements traceability matrix, defining how the solution will be evaluated, and drafting a high-level data model are not activities that should be initiated before beginning requirements elicitation. These activities are part of the analysis, validation, and management of the requirements, and they should be done after the requirements have been elicited12.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 131-132

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a context diagram is a model that shows the boundaries of an area of analysis, such as a project, a system, a process, or an organization. A context diagram depicts the main entities or actors involved in the area of analysis, and the interactions or data flows between them. A context diagram can help to ensure the most effective representation of analysis boundary, as it provides a high-level overview of the scope and context of the area of analysis, and helps to identify the key stakeholders and their relationships. A context diagram can also help to communicate and validate the scope and context with the stakeholders, and to identify any assumptions or risks related to the area of analysis. A data flow diagram, a state diagram, and an entity relationship diagram are other models that can help to analyze an area of analysis, but they do not necessarily show the boundary or scope of it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 158-159.

A business requirement is a statement that describes a business need or problem that must be addressed by the project. It should be stated in terms of what the business wants to achieve or improve, not how it will be done. The requirement in the question states a solution (an API) rather than a business need (synchronizing name and address data). It should be revised to focus on the business need and avoid specifying a solution. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 7; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 35.

 Observation is a technique that involves watching how people perform their tasks and activities in their natural work environment. Observation can be used to gain an objective, first-hand insight into tasks and activities that are difficult to describe, as it allows the business analyst to see the actual behavior, interactions, processes, and problems of the users or customers. Observation can also help to identify the implicit, hidden, or unspoken needs and expectations of the users or customers, as well as to validate the information obtained from other elicitation techniques. Observation can be done in two ways: passive or active. Passive observation means that the business analyst does not interfere or participate in the tasks and activities, but only records and analyzes what is observed. Active observation means that the business analyst interacts with the users or customers, asks questions, and provides feedback during the observation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

 Prototyping is a technique that involves creating a simplified or partial version of the solution to elicit feedback from the stakeholders. Prototyping can help the business analyst to deal with a complex project with stakeholders who find it difficult to articulate their needs by providing a visual and interactive representation of the solution. Prototyping can also help to reduce requirements risk by validating or verifying the requirements, identifying gaps or errors, and resolving ambiguities or conflicts. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

The requirements baseline is a set of approved and prioritized requirements that are used as the basis for the development scope. The requirements baseline defines what the project or program will deliver and what the stakeholders expect to receive. The requirements baseline also serves as a reference point for managing changes and measuring progress. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 9, Section 9.3.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain IV: Traceability and Monitoring, Task 1.

 Inspection is a technique or tool that is used to obtain acceptance of the delivered product. Inspection is a process that involves examining and measuring the product or its components against the predefined standards, criteria, or specifications, to determine its quality, completeness, and correctness. Inspection can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and correct any defects, errors, or deviations in the product, and to ensure that it meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. Inspection can also help to obtain the formal approval and acceptance of the product from the customer and other stakeholders, and to confirm that the product is ready for delivery or deployment. Inspection can be done using various methods, such as reviews, walkthroughs, audits, or tests. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

 The MoSCoW technique is a prioritization technique that helps to rank requirements according to their importance and urgency. The acronym stands for Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This technique can help the business analyst to manage requirements by focusing on the most critical ones and minimizing the scope creep. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

Power/interest grid is a technique that involves plotting the stakeholders on a matrix based on their level of power and interest in the project. Power/interest grid can help the business analyst to identify and categorize the stakeholders during the initial phase of a project by showing how influential and engaged each stakeholder is. Power/interest grid can also help to determine the appropriate communication and engagement strategy for each stakeholder group. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.

Customer metrics on the existing system are an input into solution evaluation and decision making in this context, as they provide a baseline for measuring the performance and value of the new solution. The business analyst can use these metrics to compare the existing system with the new solution and assess how well the new solution meets the customer needs and expectations. A cost-benefit analysis of the existing system is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not reflect the customer perspective or satisfaction with the system. Technical readiness of the development team is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not relate to the quality or effectiveness of the new solution. A new solution design specification is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it describes how the new solution will be built, not how it will perform or deliver value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 176-177; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 20.

 A change control process is a process that could help manage the situation of scope creep. Scope creep refers to the problem experienced on many projects when the size or complexity of the original product description grows. Scope creep can have negative impacts on the project schedule, budget, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. A change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, requirements, deliverables, or other configuration items are requested, evaluated, approved, implemented, and monitored. A change control process can help the business analyst and the project team to manage the expectations of the stakeholders, to assess the impact and feasibility of the changes, to prioritize and implement the changes, and to communicate the changes to the relevant parties. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

Quality assurance is a function that involves applying quality standards and processes to ensure that the project or program meets the quality requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Quality assurance also involves auditing the quality requirements and the results of quality control measurements to ensure that appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are being used. Quality assurance helps to prevent defects and errors, improve customer satisfaction, and enhance the credibility and reputation of the organization. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 10, Section 10.3.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Evaluation, Task 3.

 Interviewing stakeholders to clearly define the problem is the most important action to contribute to the success of the initial stage of the project. Interviewing is an elicitation technique that involves asking questions to stakeholders to gather information about their needs, expectations, issues, and goals. Defining the problem clearly helps to establish the business need, the project scope, and the solution approach. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.5; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain I: Needs Assessment, Task 2.

 Operational feasibility is the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking to understand how well a potential solution fits into the organization. Operational feasibility evaluates how the solution will affect the current operations, processes, culture, and people of the organization. It also considers how the solution will be accepted, adopted, and used by the stakeholders. Technical feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution can be implemented using the available technology, infrastructure, and resources. Cost-effectiveness feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how the solution will provide benefits that outweigh its costs. Time feasibility is not the kind of feasibility assessment that the business analyst is undertaking, as it evaluates how long it will take to implement the solution and whether it can meet the desired schedule. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 41-42 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 14 

 Agile is an approach to enable developers and product owners to be in constant communication so that changes or issues that occur during development are exposed and discussed as they develop. Agile emphasizes iterative and incremental delivery of value, collaboration, feedback, and adaptation. Agile methods include Scrum, Kanban, XP, and others. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 17.

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

The next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards is to ensure that the requirements are validated. Validation is a process that confirms that the requirements align with the business objectives, stakeholder needs, and expected value of the project. Validation also ensures that the requirements are feasible, acceptable, and testable. Validation can be performed by using techniques such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, or demonstrations. Validation can help to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, or conflicts in the requirements before they are approved and implemented. Setting the priority of the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that determines the order and importance of the requirements based on their value, risk, urgency, or dependency. Priority can be set before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not verify or confirm that the requirements meet the stakeholder expectations or project goals. Communicating the requirements to stakeholders is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that involves sharing and presenting the requirements to relevant stakeholders for feedback, approval, or implementation. Communication can be done before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not check or ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business objectives or deliver value to the stakeholders. Baselineing the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that establishes an agreed-upon version of the requirements as a reference point for further changes or development. Baselineing can be done only after validating and approving the requirements, as it implies that they are complete, correct, clear, and consistent. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.