Salesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Dumps

This is the correct answer because a partial copy sandbox can provide a subset of production data that is refreshed every 5 days. This way, the user acceptance and functional teams can test independently in isolation, and on current production data that was modified within the last week. A developer pro sandbox has a limited data storage and cannot store enough data for testing. A developer sandbox has no data and is only suitable for development and testing of code. A full sandbox can provide a complete copy of production data, but it can only be refreshed every 29 days, which may not meet the requirement of testing on data that was modified within the last week.

 Creating a Center of Excellence with a charter document is a recommended practice for managing multiple projects and aligning them with the business goals and roadmap. A Center of Excellence is a cross-functional team that provides guidance, support, and governance for the Salesforce ecosystem. A charter document defines the vision, mission, roles, and responsibilities of the Center of Excellence.

A Center of Excellence is a mechanism that can help to increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality, by defining and managing best practices, standards, and governance across the organization. A Center of Excellence can also facilitate cross-functional collaboration, knowledge sharing, and alignment of Salesforce initiatives with business goals. A Change Control Board is a group of stakeholders that reviews and approves changes to the system, but does not necessarily promote the use of standard Salesforce functionality. A Requirements Traceability Matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and test cases, but does not necessarily increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality. A Project Management Office is a group that oversees the execution of projects, but does not necessarily increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality.

: Storing the records in sandboxes and production is not a good practice, as it can lead to data inconsistencies and conflicts. Storing the records in a version control system is a better option, as it allows tracking changes and deploying them to different environments. Using a third-party product to manage these records is also a valid option, as it can provide features such as data backup, restore, and migration.

This is the correct answer because developers should work on feature branches that are derived from the develop branch, which represents the latest stable version of the code. The feature branches should then be merged back into the develop branch after they are completed and tested. This way, the develop branch always contains the most updated code that is ready for release.

The best practice for releasing near peak business periods is to avoid doing so, as it can cause disruption and risk to the business operations. Making declarative changes in production, bypassing regression testing, and having developers conduct user acceptance testing are all bad practices that can introduce errors and instability to the system.

To reduce deployment time, UC can use the following strategies:

Use recent deployment validations and the quick deploy feature, which can allow them to skip the validation step in production and deploy the changes faster, if they have already validated the changes in a sandbox within the last four days.

Specify the test to run by using RunSpecifiedTests test level, which can allow them to run only the tests that are relevant to the components being deployed, instead of running all the tests in the org.

Aura accessibility tests can be called in JSTEST and WebDriver Test environments. JSTEST is a JavaScript testing framework that runs on Node.js and can be used to test Aura components. WebDriver Test is a Selenium-based testing framework that can be used to test the user interface and accessibility of Aura components. ACCTEST and AuraDriver Test are not valid environments for calling Aura accessibility tests.

 Automated browser testing and static code quality analysis are two quality assurance techniques that can help minimize defects in software projects, and that an architect should recommend for Universal Containers to incorporate into its overall CI/CD pipeline. Automated browser testing is a technique that involves using tools or frameworks to simulate user interactions with the web application across different browsers and devices, and to verify the functionality and performance of the application. Static code quality analysis is a technique that involves using tools or frameworks to scan the code and detect any violations of the predefined coding rules and best practices, such as syntax errors, security issues, code smells, etc. Business verification testing and stress testing are also quality assurance techniques, but they are not as suitable or relevant for the CI/CD pipeline, as they are more focused on validating the business requirements and the system capacity.

A, C, and E are the correct answers, as Force.com Migration Tool, Source Control Tool, and Continuous Integration Build Tool are the tools that should be used to enable a continuous integration process to help manage code quality. A continuous integration process is a practice that involves merging code changes from multiple developers into a common repository, and then testing and validating them automatically, before deploying them to the target environment. Force.com Migration Tool is a tool that uses the Metadata API to retrieve and deploy metadata components, such as code, from one org to another. Source Control Tool is a tool that manages the versions and changes of the code, and allows for collaboration and integration among the developers. Continuous Integration Build Tool is a tool that automates the testing and deployment of the code, and ensures that the code meets the quality and functionality standards. B is incorrect, as Full Sandbox Environment is not a tool that should be used to enable a continuous integration process, as it is a copy of a production org that is used for development and testing purposes, but not for merging, testing, or deploying code changes. D is incorrect, as Project Management Tool is not a tool that should be used to enable a continuous integration process, as it is a tool that helps to plan, organize, and track the progress of the project, but not to manage, test, or deploy code changes. You can learn more about these tools in the Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery module on Trailhead.

The recommendation to satisfy the customer requirements is to use a Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment tool and build the pipeline to deploy to sandboxes and production. A Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment tool can automate the process of building, testing, and deploying the changes to different environments, as well as provide feedback and visibility into the deployment status and results. This can help to streamline and accelerate the deployment process, as well as to ensure consistency and quality across the environments. Using SFDX and documenting the deployment commands with steps to be executed for each environment is not a good recommendation, as it still requires manual intervention and execution, which can be error-prone and time-consuming. Using ANT script and building a custom application to run the script and use change sets to deploy supported metadata is not a good recommendation, as it involves using multiple tools and methods, which can increase the complexity and risk of the deployment process. Using an AppExchange solution that packages the deployment components and you can run the deployment wizard to track deployment result is not a good recommendation, as it may not support all the metadata types and features that need to be deployed, and it may not integrate well with the SFDX tools and methodologies that UC is using.

The only condition that would make continuous integration unsuitable for UC is if their Salesforce instance has only standard functionality, as this would mean that there is no need for code deployment or version control. Option A is not a valid reason, as test scripts can be generated and executed as part of the continuous integration process. Option B is not a valid reason, as a full sandbox is not a requirement for continuous integration, and other types of sandboxes can be used instead. Option D is not a valid reason, as there are free or low-cost software tools available for continuous integration, such as Jenkins, Git, and Ant

 The daily release process is the most suitable for creating a new report to support an urgent client request, as it can deliver the functionality in a timely manner. Creating the report in a full sandbox and then deploying it to production can ensure the quality and security of the report.

The architect should recommend creating two second generation managed packages with the same namespace and setting the methods that should be shared with the @namespaceAccessible annotation. This will allow the Sales team to access the specific functions of the Service product without exposing them to other teams or customers. Creating two managed packages with different namespaces will not allow the Sales team to access the Service functions, unless they are declared as global, which will expose them to everyone. Creating a managed package with both products will not allow the separation of the products and the control of the functions. Creating an authentication function in the Service package will add unnecessary complexity and overhead to the solution.

A full sandbox would be appropriate for diagnosing reports of poor performance when accessing certain Visualforce pages, as it provides a complete copy of the production data and metadata, which allows the developers to replicate and troubleshoot the issue in a realistic environment. A partial copy sandbox would not be appropriate, as it only provides a sample of the production data, which may not reflect the actual volume and complexity of the data that affects the performance. A developer sandbox would not be appropriate, as it only provides a copy of the production metadata, but not the data, which makes it impossible to test the performance of the Visualforce pages with real data. A developer pro sandbox would not be appropriate, as it also only provides a copy of the production metadata, but not the data, which makes it impossible to test the performance of the Visualforce pages with real data.

Building an Apex framework to deploy CPQ records and using an open source SFDX plugin and version control are two best practice recommendations an architect should propose to allow UC to deploy CPQ features as part of their CI/CD process. Building an Apex framework to deploy CPQ records is a good practice, as it allows the architect to automate the deployment of the configuration SObjects that drive the business logic of CPQ, and to avoid manual steps or errors. Using an open source SFDX plugin and version control is another good practice, as it allows the architect to leverage the benefits of the Salesforce DX development model, such as source-driven development, modular packaging, and team collaboration. Using a third-party product or data loader to deploy CSV files are not best practices, as they can introduce additional costs, dependencies, or risks to the deployment process.

The Service Cloud developer will see the conflict and need to resolve it when they create a pull request from ServiceCase to UCDev in GitHub. A pull request is a way of proposing changes to a branch and requesting a review and merge from another branch. GitHub will show any conflicts that prevent the pull request from being merged automatically, and the developer will need to resolve them manually before the merge can happen.

The best option is to ensure the sandbox will be on the release preview, which means it will be upgraded to the new platform release before the production environment. This will allow the team to test the deployment in a realistic scenario and catch any potential issues. Option A is not ideal, as the staging and production support sandboxes will not be on the same platform version as the production environment. Option C is also not ideal, as the production support sandbox will not be on the same platform version as the production environment. Option D is risky, as the staging sandbox refresh may not complete in time for the go-live.

Two testing types that an architect should recommend to ensure users don’t face platform slowdowns during peak business hours are: stress testing and performance testing. Stress testing is the process of testing the system under extreme load conditions, such as a large number of concurrent requests, to determine its breaking point and identify any potential bottlenecks or failures. Performance testing is the process of testing the system under normal or expected load conditions, such as the average number of requests per day, to measure its response time, throughput, and resource utilization. These testing types can help ensure that the web service can handle the expected volume and frequency of requests, and that it meets the performance and reliability requirements. Unit testing is not a testing type that an architect should recommend for this scenario, as it is the process of testing individual units of code, such as methods or classes, to verify their functionality and logic. Load testing is also not a testing type that an architect should recommend for this scenario, as it is the process of testing the system under a specific load condition, such as a fixed number of requests, to evaluate its behavior and performance. See Testing RESTful Web Services for more details.

User fields are preserved during metadata deployments and Salesforce attempts to locate a matching user in the target org during deployment. If the username in the source org doesn’t exist in the target org, the deployment will stop until the usernames are resolved or removed.

 The best option for UC given the scenario is to opt for a multi-org strategy, where each org can have its own sales process, common rules, and operate in locale. A multi-org strategy can accommodate the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A multi-org strategy can also allow for more innovation and flexibility, as each org can customize and optimize its own functionality. A single-org strategy may not be able to support the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A single-org strategy may also limit the innovation and flexibility, as the org has to follow a standardized and consistent approach.

 The two actions that can effectively contribute to the quality and agility of the team are: Define and follow code standards, and use static code analysis tool in the pipeline before manual code review. Code standards can help ensure consistency, readability, and maintainability of the code, as well as reduce errors and bugs. A static code analysis tool can help automate the code review process and identify any issues or violations of the code standards before the manual review. Choosing the most senior developer to help the technical lead or skipping the code review are not effective actions, as they can lead to more errors and delays.

Testing load considering 50% more call volume is a reasonable test load consideration, as it can simulate the expected future growth and ensure that the application can handle the increased demand without compromising the performance or functionality.

 Two options that should be considered when making production changes in a highly regulated and audited environment are: all changes including hotfixes should be reviewed against security principles, and any production change should have explicit stakeholder approval. These options can help ensure that the changes are compliant with the regulations and have the necessary authorization and documentation. No manual steps should be carried out is not a valid option, as some changes may require manual steps, such as data migration or post-deployment verification. After deployment, the development team should test and verify functionality in production is also not a valid option, as testing and verification should be done in a lower environment before deploying to production, and the responsibility of testing and verifying functionality in production should be assigned to a different team than the development team. See Application Lifecycle and Deployment for more details.

To ensure that bugs found in production are more easily analyzed in the full sandbox, the architect should recommend to refresh the full sandbox after every deployment in production, and to perform the same process in the sandbox before any deployment in production. This way, the full sandbox will be in sync with the production org and will have the same metadata and code. Creating a daily process of copying new and changed data in production to the full sandbox is not necessary, as the full sandbox already has a copy of the production data. Performing a Refresh Data in the full sandbox is not possible, as this option is only available for partial copy and developer pro sandboxes.

 In the change set model, the source of truth is a combination of the metadata already in the environment and the content of your change set, as you stated correctly. However, a change set cannot be retrieved from the developer’s workbench as a package, nor can it be pushed into the version control system. Change sets are only available within the Salesforce UI, and they are not compatible with version control systems. In the package development model, the source of truth is the metadata in the package project, which makes it easy to integrate to a version control system, as you stated correctly. Additionally, in the package development model, the best practice is to consider the dependencies and build them into the package so it can be deployed in any other target orgs. This ensures that the package is self-contained and does not rely on external components that may not exist in the target org.

 Three advantages of using the SFDX are: can store code on a local machine, or a version control system; can create scratch orgs; and can install application metadata from a central repository. These advantages can help improve the development experience, as they allow developers to work with source-driven development, use ephemeral and configurable environments, and access metadata components from a shared location. Can quickly deploy metadata using Execute Anonymous is not an advantage of using the SFDX, as Execute Anonymous is a feature of the Developer Console that allows running Apex code, not deploying metadata. Can use native Deployment Rollback Tool to quickly revert to prior state is also not an advantage of using the SFDX, as there is no such tool in the SFDX. See [Salesforce DX] for more details.

The data model becomes more complex as the scope in the org increases, and the declarative sharing and visibility capabilities may not be sufficient to ensure correct visibility of objects and records for multiple LOBs. Apex design and multiple currencies are not specific challenges for a single-org strategy.

 To address the bug in production, the architect should recommend the following approaches: Investigate potential data impacts, fix the bug in a hotfix branch, and seek stakeholder approval for the hotfix. Investigating the data impacts can help assess the severity and scope of the bug, and determine the best course of action to mitigate any data loss or corruption. Fixing the bug in a hotfix branch can help isolate the change and avoid introducing any other changes from the current sprint. Seeking stakeholder approval for the hotfix can help ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements and governance policies.

The best practice is to always fix the bug in the developer environment where the project work was done, and follow the normal deployment and testing process. This ensures that the code is consistent, traceable, and validated across all environments. Fixing the bug in UAT is not ideal, as it can introduce new issues, create conflicts with other changes, and bypass the version control system. Spinning up a new sandbox for a hot fix is not necessary, as it can add complexity and overhead to the deployment process. Treating the issue as a change request and putting it in the backlog is not advisable, as it can delay the resolution and affect the user experience.

 To support application lifecycle methodology, you need tools that can help you manage the source code, automate the deployment process, and track the issues and bugs. A version control repository is a tool that allows you to store, track, and collaborate on the source code of your application. A continuous integration tool is a tool that allows you to automate the deployment of your code to different environments, as well as run tests and validations. An issue tracking tool is a tool that allows you to record, monitor, and resolve the issues and bugs that arise during the development and testing phases. A database management system is a tool that allows you to store, manipulate, and query data, but it is not directly related to application lifecycle methodology. A middleware is a software layer that facilitates communication and data exchange between different applications, but it is not directly related to application lifecycle methodology either.

 The best way to address the issue of hitting governor limits while testing Apex classes is to use test.startTest() and test.stopTest() methods to reset governor limits. These methods mark the start and end of the test code, and allow you to run your test code with a separate set of governor limits. There is no AppExchange product that can temporarily increase the governor limits, and there is no auto reset property or test.setLimit() and test.resetLimit() methods that can reset governor limits.

3020

This is the correct answer because some components, such as custom settings, user permissions, and email templates, cannot be deployed via the Metadata API. Therefore, these components should be documented and manually deployed or configured in the target environment.

 Cross-site scripting is the most common reason that the prospect AppExchange products fail the security review. Cross-site scripting (XSS) is a type of web application vulnerability that allows an attacker to inject malicious code into a web page that is viewed by other users. XSS can compromise the security and privacy of the users, as well as the functionality and performance of the application. Salesforce has strict security standards and policies for AppExchange products, and any product that has XSS vulnerabilities will not pass the security review. CRUD/FLS, session hacking, and SOQL injection are also security issues that can affect AppExchange products, but they are not as common or severe as XSS.

The development model that the architect should recommend to be used by the consolidated development team is the package development model. This model allows teams to build release artifacts that can be tested and released independently from artifacts for other projects, using unlocked packages or second-generation managed packages. This model can help improve the modularity, reusability, and maintainability of the code and configuration, as well as enable source-driven development and continuous integration and delivery. The org development model is not a good choice for the consolidated development team, as it is based on working directly in an org and using change sets or metadata API tools to deploy changes. This model can lead to conflicts, dependencies, and governance issues, especially when working on multiple projects or with multiple teams. The change set development model is also not a good choice for the consolidated development team, as it is based on using change sets to deploy changes between connected orgs. This model can be slow, error-prone, and limited, as it does not support all metadata types, dependencies, or automation. The package development model does not allow packages to be created and deployed using declarative (point-and-click) development tools, without writing code. This is a wrong statement, as the package development model supports both declarative and programmatic development tools, and requires writing code to create and install packages using the Salesforce CLI or APIs. See Package Development Model for more details.

 A and C are the characteristics of an effective communication plan, as they enable feedback, collaboration, and transparency among the stakeholders. B is not a characteristic of an effective communication plan, as it does not account for changes in the stakeholder list or their communication preferences. D is not a characteristic of an effective communication plan, as it limits the information sharing and trust among the stakeholders.

 To reduce defects, the architect should recommend increasing the code coverage to 95% and adding more details to the acceptance criteria. Increasing the code coverage can help ensure that the code is thoroughly tested and meets the quality standards. Adding more details to the acceptance criteria can help clarify the requirements and expectations for the functionality. Using the test script to define the test classes or having the test analyst create the test classes are not good practices, as they can introduce errors and inconsistencies in the testing process.

Tracking effort estimates, actuals, and remaining work can help the developer improve their estimation skills and accuracy, which can benefit the project planning and delivery.

The best way to migrate from a managed package to an unlocked package is to split the components into two packages: one for the objects and fields, and one for the classes, Visualforce, and other components. This way, the data and integrations with the objects and fields of the managed package are preserved, and the classes and Visualforce can be modified and deployed using CI/CD processes with the unlocked package. Exporting and restoring the data from the managed package is not a feasible solution, as it would require a lot of effort and risk data loss or corruption. Installing the unlocked package with the same namespace as the managed package is not possible, as namespaces are unique and cannot be reused. Staying with the managed package is not a good option, as it does not allow for better integration with CI/CD processes.

The fastest approach to spin off a sandbox with up to 10,000 records in each object for testing the integration performance is to spin off a partial copy sandbox using a sandbox template with all the objects required for testing the integration. A partial copy sandbox can copy up to 10,000 records per object using a sandbox template that specifies the objects and fields to copy. A partial copy sandbox can also copy the metadata and the configuration settings from the production org. A developer pro sandbox, a development sandbox, or a full copy sandbox may not be able to copy enough data for testing the integration performance, as they have lower data storage limits. A developer pro sandbox and a development sandbox can only copy 1 GB of data, while a full copy sandbox can only copy 5 GB of data. A full copy sandbox may also take longer to spin-off, as it copies all the data and metadata from the production org.

Two software development methodologies that an architect should suggest to solve the issue of visibility are Scrum and Kanban. Scrum is based on the value of openness, which means that the team members and stakeholders share information and feedback regularly and transparently. Kanban is based on the principle of making everything visible, which means that the team uses a visual board to track the progress and status of the work items. Waterfall is not a good methodology for visibility, as it does not allow for frequent communication and feedback. DevOps is not a methodology, but a culture and practice that aims to improve collaboration and delivery across the software development lifecycle.

The best way to stop the rollbacks from happening is to ensure report metadata is exported daily and that it is merged into the developer branches before the next release. This way, the reports and dashboards will be up to date and consistent across all environments. Using a third-party data warehouse is not a solution, as it does not address the root cause of the rollbacks. Removing the executive’s ability to change reports is not a good practice, as it limits their flexibility and autonomy. Backing up and reimporting the reports before and after the release is not a reliable or scalable solution, as it can introduce errors and inconsistencies.

Creating design standards focused on integration and providing training to all teams is the best way to address the challenges of having various integration patterns and a lack of common understanding of the integration landscape. Design standards can help to establish consistent and best practices for integrating Salesforce with other systems, such as choosing the appropriate integration style, pattern, tool, and protocol. Training can help to educate and align the teams on the design standards and the integration architecture.

 The change set performance may depend on the included components, especially if they are complex or have many dependencies. The change set may take more time than usual if it includes changes to permission sets and profiles, as these components require additional validation and processing. The change set may not take more time if it includes field type changes, new custom objects and fields, or other simple components.

A source control tool provides the ability for distributed teams to work in isolation, as they can create branches and merge their changes later. It also provides the ability to backup code/configuration changes, as they can be stored in a remote repository and retrieved if needed.

The development model that is optimized for this need is to use unlocked packages to deploy the global code and allow each country to create its customized unlocked package extensions. This model can help maintain the global standardization and consistency of the code, while also providing the flexibility and autonomy for each region to customize some aspects of the code for their specific needs. Unlocked packages are a type of second-generation packaging that can be created and installed using the Salesforce CLI or APIs, and can be upgraded or uninstalled as needed. Unlocked package extensions are a type of unlocked packages that can depend on and extend another unlocked package or a managed package. See Unlocked Packages for more details.

Test classes should execute under various profiles to ensure that the code works for different user permissions and sharing settings. Test data must have positive as well as negative data to cover all possible scenarios and edge cases.

 DevPro1 cannot be cloned because it is on a different version from Production, as it was upgraded to preview for the next Salesforce major release two weeks ago. Therefore, the architect should recommend creating a new DevPro2, and migrating metadata from DevPro1. This way, the second work stream can work on the Service Cloud requirements in a separate sandbox, without affecting the Sales Cloud dev team. Asking the second work stream team to work on the same DevPro1 sandbox would create conflicts and dependencies between the two teams, and would not allow them to release at different times. Pushing back on the requirements because adding another work stream will bring some risks with it would not be a good option, as the business needs might be urgent and important.

 The success criteria for data migration and the manual and automated data validation approaches are two key areas of UC’s data migration test plan that should be included. The success criteria define the expected outcomes and quality standards for the data migration process. The data validation approaches ensure that the data is accurate, complete, and consistent after the migration.

 B and D are the decisions that should be made by an Architecture Review Board (ARB), as they involve choosing the best methodology and authentication mechanism for the project, which have significant impacts on the project scope, quality, and security. A is not a decision that should be made by an ARB, as it is a low-level design decision that can be made by the developers or technical leads. C is not a decision that should be made by an ARB, as it is a testing decision that can be made by the testers or quality assurance leads.

QUESTIONNO: 87

What is the process used to initiate a connection for change sets?

A. Modify the source org to allow an outbound connection to the target org

B. Modify the target org to accept an outbound connection from the source org

C. Modify the target org to accept an inbound connection from the source org

D. Modify the source org to allow an inbound connection to the target org

Answer: A

A is the correct answer, as the process to initiate a connection for change sets is to modify the source org to allow an outbound connection to the target org. B and C are incorrect, as the target org does not need to accept any connection from the source org, but only to deploy the inbound change sets that are sent from the source org. D is incorrect, as the source org does not need to allow any inbound connection to the target org, but only to create and upload the outbound change sets to the target org. You can learn more about this process in the Change Sets Basics module on Trailhead.

 Using a Source Control system alongside a multi-sandbox development strategy has several advantages, such as performing code reviews before promoting to a pre-production sandbox, keeping a history of changes made by each developer, and creating a branching strategy that tracks each feature or change separately. Automatically deploying changes from sandbox to production is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a function of a Continuous Integration tool. Acting as a backup in case of catastrophic data loss is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a benefit of having a sandbox strategy.

This is the correct answer because Salesforce prohibits stress testing against production because it is a shared environment that hosts multiple customers and tenants. Stress testing against production may affect the performance and availability of the Salesforce service for other customers and violate the terms of service. Stress testing should be done in a sandbox or a developer edition org that is isolated from production.

Managed package is the recommended mechanism for releasing an application that can be installed in other Salesforce environments. Managed packages allow for versioning, licensing, and upgradeability of the application. They also protect the intellectual property of the developer by hiding the source code of the Apex classes and Visualforce pages.

Refreshing a sandbox during the release preview window to ensure they have the upcoming release is a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it allows them to test their application in an environment that matches the production environment after the upgrade. Running regression tests in an upgraded sandbox to detect any issues with the upgrade is also a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it helps them to verify that the existing functionality is not affected by the new features or changes introduced by the upgrade. Reviewing the release notes for automatically-enabled features and technical debt is also a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it helps them to understand the impact and benefits of the new features or changes, as well as to identify and resolve any technical debt that may cause issues or conflicts with the upgrade. Contacting Salesforce to schedule a time to upgrade the full sandbox is not a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it is not possible to request a specific time for the upgrade of the full sandbox, which is determined by Salesforce and depends on the release window and the pod assignment. Upgrading any SOAP integrations to the newest WSDL as early as possible is not a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it is not necessary to upgrade the SOAP integrations to the newest WSDL, unless they want to use the new features or fields introduced by the upgrade. The SOAP integrations will continue to work with the previous WSDL versions, as they are backward compatible.

To move to the package development model, the administrator must enable both the Dev Hub and the Second-Generation Managed Packages in setup. The Dev Hub is the main org where the administrator can create and manage scratch orgs and packages. The Second-Generation Managed Packages are the new format of packages that support modular development and versioning. The Unlocked Packages are a type of second-generation packages that are not tied to a namespace and can be installed and customized in any org. The Source Tracking for Scratch Orgs is a feature that allows the administrator to track the changes made in a scratch org and push or pull them to or from a source repository.

An agile team is one that improves and evolves its processes and frequently delivers value to the end users. This is the main characteristic of an agile team, as opposed to a traditional team that follows a fixed plan and delivers on predefined dates. Agile teams use various frameworks, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Extreme Programming, but these are not essential to be agile. Agile teams also have shorter iterations, such as biweekly sprints, but these are not the only way to ensure on-time delivery.

A product owner is responsible for defining the scope and prioritizing the backlog of the project. A product owner can help the COE manage the scope creep between the different projects by aligning the business goals and ensuring the value delivery. A scrum master, a release manager, and a change manager are not directly involved in scope management.

Utilizing a dedicated developer pro sandbox to address critical bugs and release to production is the recommended release management strategy, as it allows the development team to work on the new project without being interrupted by the bug fixes, and also ensures that the bug fixes are deployed to production as soon as possible. Including fixes for critical bugs in the ongoing development sandboxes is not recommended, as it may delay the release of the bug fixes and also introduce conflicts with the new code. Keeping teams separate until the end of the project and creating a full copy sandbox to merge their work then is not recommended, as it may create a lot of merge conflicts and integration issues. Addressing critical bugs in the development sandboxes and pushing those changes to production separately is not recommended, as it may create inconsistencies between the development and production environments.

Pairing with the administrator and reviewing each change as it happens is the best way to handle the situation of discovering a Sev0 defect in production. This way, the architect can ensure that the changes are done correctly and quickly, without compromising the quality or security of the application. The architect can also provide guidance and feedback to the administrator, as well as monitor the impact and outcome of the changes. Denying the suggestion, explaining that only developers are certified to make changes, or calling the security team are not advisable actions, as they can delay the resolution of the defect, increase the damage, or create unnecessary conflict.

 Implementing a pull request and secure code review will contribute to an improvement of code security by ensuring that the code is checked and approved by another developer before merging to the main branch. Integrating a static code security analysis tool in the CI/CD process will contribute to an improvement of code security by automatically scanning the code for vulnerabilities and enforcing security standards. Hiring a company specialized in secure code review or using two developers to review and fix current code vulnerabilities are not actions that will improve code security, but rather remediate existing security issues.

Refreshing all non-preview sandboxes during the release preview window is the best way to handle the situation of having a mix of preview and non-preview instances for the release of a major project. A release preview window is a period of time before a Salesforce seasonal release, where the customers can test their applications and integrations in a sandbox that has the same version as the upcoming release. By refreshing all non-preview sandboxes during this window, the architect can ensure that all the sandboxes are aligned with the same version and avoid any conflicts or errors during the deployment. Refreshing the sandboxes when the release management team has time, mixing instance types, or contacting support to rollback the release are not good practices, as they can cause inconsistency, confusion, or disruption in the release process.

 The two deployment tools that will support the request are the ANT Migration Tool and VS Code with Salesforce Extension. These tools allow the developers to deploy metadata components from one Salesforce org to another, and also to maintain and modify the code locally in their own machines. Change Sets and Developer Console are not suitable for this scenario, because they do not support deploying to multiple orgs or working offline.

A suitable branching policy to recommend for multiple development teams that work on separate streams of work, with different timelines, is trunk-based development. This policy allows each team to work on their own feature branches, and merge them to the main branch (trunk) frequently, using pull requests and code reviews. This can help avoid merge conflicts, ensure code quality, and enable continuous integration and delivery. Leaf-based development is not a valid branching policy, as it is a term used to describe the nodes in a tree data structure. GitHub flow is a specific implementation of trunk-based development, but it is not a branching policy by itself. Scratch-org-based development is not a branching policy, but a development model that uses scratch orgs as ephemeral environments. See Trunk-Based Development for more details.

Waterfall development methodology has some positive aspects, such as:

Complex processes that will need to be built are thoroughly understood and documented before coding begins, which can reduce the risk of ambiguity and rework.

Milestones, timelines and estimates tend to be more accurate and predictable due to the upfront due diligence, which can help with project management and stakeholder expectations.

 Developing a new Customer Community with an Agile methodology and a three-month timeline poses some risks, such as the functionality that can be delivered in 3 months is unknown, and may not meet the needs of the business, and given the lack of requirements and the three-month timeline commitment, the project may not be feasible. Agile is an appropriate development methodology for Customer Community implementations, as it allows for iterative and incremental delivery of value. Agile also allows for changes to requirements, so customers can provide feedback and prioritize the most important features.

 Generating a code review checklist to ensure consistency between reviews and different reviewers and conducting a review that combines human efforts and automatic checks by the tool to detect all flaws are two recommended practices to follow when conducting secure code reviews, as they can help improve the quality and security of the code and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities or errors. Focusing on the aggregated reviews to save time and effort, to remove the need to continuously monitor each meaningful change is not a good practice, as it can miss important details or changes that can affect the code functionality or security. Using the code review software as the tool to flag which developer has committed the errors, so the developer can improve is not a constructive way of conducting code reviews, as it can create a blame culture and discourage collaboration and learning. See Secure Coding Guidelines for more details.

The best environment for developing a new feature in an org with unlocked packages is a scratch org with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies. A scratch org is a source-driven and disposable deployment of Salesforce code and metadata that is fully configurable and can be created quickly. A scratch org can also install unlocked packages and their dependencies, which can help ensure compatibility and functionality of the new feature. A Developer Pro sandbox is not a good option, as it is not source-driven and can have outdated or conflicting data and metadata.