Scrum PSK-I Dumps

Limiting Work in Progress (WIP) has several potential benefits for a Scrum Team, including:

1.Shorter feedback cycles (Option A): By limiting the amount of work in progress, the team can focus on completing work faster, which leads to shorter feedback loops and quicker validation of hypotheses or deliverables.

2.More sustainable pace of work (Option B): Limiting WIP helps prevent overburdening the team, promoting a more balanced and sustainable work pace.

3.Faster realization of value (Option C): By completing items more quickly and reducing multitasking, the team delivers value faster to stakeholders.

4.Improved collaboration (Option D): When WIP is limited, team members are more likely to collaborate to finish tasks that are already in progress rather than starting new ones.

In the context of Professional Scrum with Kanban, the Sprint Retrospective is the most suitable time to inspect and adapt WIP Limits. This is because the Retrospective is a dedicated time-box for the Scrum Team to reflect on its performance and identify areas for improvement.

Here's why:

Continuous Improvement:The Retrospective is a key part of the Scrum framework, designed to foster continuous improvement. By reviewing WIP Limits during this time, the team can assess their effectiveness and make data-driven decisions.

Data-Driven Decisions:By tracking WIP Limits over time, the team can gather valuable insights into their workflow and identify bottlenecks. This data can inform decisions about adjusting WIP Limits to optimize flow and productivity.

Team Collaboration:The Retrospective provides an opportunity for the entire team to discuss and agree upon changes to WIP Limits. This collaborative approach ensures buy-in and commitment from all team members.

While it's true that Developers can monitor WIP Limits throughout the Sprint, the Retrospective is the designated time for a formal review and adjustment. This ensures that any changes are aligned with the team's overall goals and strategy.

The Definition of Done (DoD) still applies even if policies are explicitly stated at each column of your workflow. The DoD is a fundamental concept in Scrum that ensures a shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete. Even with explicit policies at each stage of the workflow, the DoD provides a consistent standard for the team's deliverables, ensuring quality and alignment with stakeholder expectations

While refining the Product Backlog is essential in Scrum, it is not an essential component specifically for achieving flow in Kanban practices. Achieving flow requires visualizing the workflow, limiting WIP, actively managing WIP, and continuously inspecting and adapting the workflow. Frequent Product Backlog refinement helps with the overall Scrum framework but is not directly tied to the initial goal of achieving flow in a Kanban system

This statement is incorrect. A Scrum Team will not stop using Sprints just by implementing Kanban. Kanban is used to complement Scrum practices, not replace them. The team continues to use Sprints as a cadence and timebox for delivering increments of work while also incorporating Kanban principles like visualizing work, limiting WIP, and managing flow to enhance their process

A Service Level Expectation (SLE) in Kanban provides an agreement or expectation regarding the time it will take to complete a work item. An SLE consists of two main elements:

1.A probability (Option B): This is the likelihood or confidence level (e.g., 85%) that a work item will be completed within the specified period.

2.A period of elapsed days (Option D): This defines the maximum amount of time (e.g., 10 days) expected for a work item to be completed. The combination of these two elements helps set clear expectations and guide planning and forecasting efforts(

Options A (A cost of delay) and C (A forecasted date) are not part of the standard elements defining an SLE. The cost of delay is a concept related to prioritization, and a forecasted date is usually derived from the SLE but is not part of it.

The primary effect of limiting Work in Progress (WIP) is to create a pull system. A pull system ensures that new work is only started when there is capacity, meaning that work is "pulled" into the system when the team has the availability to do so. This approach prevents overloading the team and helps maintain a steady and predictable flow of work, aligning with the Kanban practices within the Scrum framework

Kanban emphasizes explicit policies for better transparency and alignment, and elements such as the Definition of Done, Definition of Ready, and Product Backlog refinement can be utilized as explicit policies to clarify the Scrum Team’s working agreements. These policies help the team make consistent decisions and streamline their processes. References: The Kanban Guide for Scrum Teams and The Scrum Guide​​.

When WIP limits are implemented, Developers are encouraged to focus on completing existing tasks rather than starting new ones. This leads to a more collaborative approach, as team members may swarm to complete items together. Additionally, limiting WIP enhances transparency in the process, which in turn strengthens self-management by the team. These principles align with Kanban’s emphasis on active management and the Scrum framework's focus on collaboration. References: The Kanban Guide for Scrum Teams​​.

During the Sprint Retrospective, once a team decides to supplement their Scrum with Kanban, all the mentioned elements might be considered:

•Workflow: To ensure it aligns with Kanban practices.

•Current policies: To review and adapt any team policies that may need to change.

•WIP Limit: To set appropriate limits to enhance flow.

•Metrics and charts (e.g., Cumulative Flow Diagram, Cycle Time Scatterplot, Work Item Aging): To visualize flow, identify bottlenecks, and make data-driven decisions for continuous improvement.

Considering all these elements helps the Scrum Team integrate Kanban practices effectively into their existing Scrum framework

During a flow-based Daily Scrum, the team is likely to review metrics such as Work Item Age and Work in Progress (WIP):

•Work Item Age: Helps to identify items that have been in progress for a longer time than expected, signaling possible impediments or the need for swarming to complete those items.

•Work in Progress (WIP): Indicates the number of items currently being worked on, ensuring that the team is not exceeding the agreed WIP limits, which is crucial for maintaining a steady flow

Supplementing Scrum with Kanban practices encourages team collaboration and swarming. Kanban practices such as visualizing the workflow, limiting WIP, and focusing on flow metrics foster an environment where team members are more likely to collaborate closely to resolve bottlenecks and ensure a steady flow of work. This collaboration, often called "swarming," involves team members working together on fewer items to complete them faster, thereby enhancing team dynamics and efficiency

Adjusting WIP limits can directly impact Cycle Time and overall flow by reducing bottlenecks and increasing focus. Lowering WIP can enhance the team’s ability to complete work within a Sprint by minimizing task switching and promoting faster delivery of value. References: The Kanban Guide for Scrum Teams​​.

Lagging indicator metrics are metrics that provide information about past performance:

1.Velocity (Option A): This is a measure of the amount of work a Scrum Team completes in a Sprint. It is a lagging indicator because it reflects what has been done rather than predicting future performance.

2.Cycle Time (Option B): This metric measures the time taken to complete a work item from start to finish. It is a lagging indicator because it provides data on how long work items took to complete in the past.

3.Throughput (Option D): This refers to the number of work items completed in a given period. Like Velocity, it reflects past performance and is considered a lagging indicator.

Work in Progress (Option C) and Work Item Aging (Option E) are not lagging indicators:

•Work in Progress (C): is a current state metric that indicates how much work is currently in progress.

•Work Item Aging (E): is a leading indicator, providing insights into how long a work item has been in progress, helping predict delays or bottlenecks

Reducing batch size does not always guarantee an increase in overall efficiency. While smaller batch sizes can lead to faster feedback, more frequent deliveries, and reduced risk, there can be situations where reducing the batch size too much results in inefficiencies, such as increased overhead costs or excessive context switching. Thus, the relationship between batch size and efficiency depends on the context, system constraints, and the nature of the work

An SLE combines a timeframe (elapsed days) and a probability, representing the likelihood that a work item will be completed within that timeframe. This helps to set realistic expectations for stakeholders and guide the team in maintaining a predictable flow. References: The Kanban Guide for Scrum Teams​.

The Scrum framework already contains elements that create a pull system. In Scrum, the team members "pull" work into the Sprint Backlog during Sprint Planning. They decide which Product Backlog items they will commit to completing based on their capacity and the Sprint Goal. This is a form of a pull system where the team only takes in as much work as they believe they can complete within a Sprint, aligning with Kanban principles that limit Work in Progress (WIP) to optimize flow

A Cycle Time scatterplot is the best chart to determine when a single item that has not been started will be finished. This chart shows the distribution of cycle times for completed work items. By analyzing the historical data, you can estimate the likely cycle time for a new item.

Here's how to use the Cycle Time scatterplot:

Identify the average cycle time:Calculate the average cycle time for similar types of work items.

Consider variability:Look at the range of cycle times to understand the variability in delivery times.

Estimate completion time:Based on the average cycle time and variability, estimate when the new item is likely to be completed.

While the other charts (CFD, Throughput run chart, and WIP Aging chart) provide valuable insights into the overall workflow, they are not as effective for predicting the completion time of a single item.

Even when using Kanban, Scrum Teams still follow the Scrum framework, which mandates crafting a Sprint Goal during Sprint Planning. The Sprint Goal provides focus and alignment for the team, ensuring that all work contributes toward a common objective, rather than being taken on as needed. References: The Scrum Guide​.

If the Product Owner requests that an urgent, unplanned work item be added during the Sprint, and it aligns with the Sprint Goal but does not fit within the current WIP limits, the Developers should:

1.Add the urgent item to their Sprint Backlog but only start working on it when their WIP Limits allow it (Option A): This maintains the integrity of the WIP limits and ensures that the team doesn't overcommit or create too much work in progress, which could affect flow and focus.

2.Take on the urgent item as an exception to the WIP Limits and visualize that they are above their WIP Limit (Option C): By taking on the urgent item as an exception, the team can address the urgency while being transparent about the temporary breach of the WIP limits. This visualization helps the team and stakeholders understand the current state of work and its impact(

Options B (Adjust the WIP Limits) and D (Reject the urgent item) are less suitable because they either undermine the WIP control mechanism or fail to accommodate a potentially critical change that aligns with the Sprint Goal.

When a Scrum Team uses Kanban, they can visualize:

•The Product Backlog: By making the Product Backlog visible, the team can track what work items are upcoming and prioritize them effectively.

•The Sprint Backlog: Visualizing the Sprint Backlog helps the team see the work planned for the current Sprint, track progress, and manage flow.

•The Definition of Done: Making the Definition of Done visible ensures that all team members and stakeholders understand the criteria that must be met for work to be considered complete